The deal with the flush is that it is "risky". Risky in that it can "dislodge" the contaminants inside the tranny. If you do that you can block other orifices that will really screw up the tranny shifting. I have a friend in the tranny business. He does not recommend the flush at all. Drain and fill (and replace filter after removing pan if accessible) is all he thinks of. All that said though I know lots of people who do the flush at a dealer with good success. But, it is risky especially on vehicles with over 50k on them. And that's because as the tranny ages it starts disintegrating internally. Clutch plates wear, the fluid looses it's viscosity and additive packages deteriorate chemically. These things combine into dirt in passages where you don't really want them. It's not like there's microscopic filters in trannys. The best ones were designs like the Saturns had. A spin on external filter. Easy to change and easy to drain. That's what they all should have (but never will in today's throw away society). And those trannys lasted. A very reliable one for sure. As for a reverse flush. It's the same problem. Dislodge the junk and you risk ruining it. But, like I said. Any tranny that is under 50k is less likely to have issues with a flush (reverse or otherwise). But, it is still risky just because if you do dislodge stuff you could be in trouble. I had a Chrysler LHS and all the online boards recommended fluid filter changes at every 30k miles due to the semi synthetic fluid and additive package they used. I followed that in mine and it was trouble free. It's up to you on what to do.
Good luck,
Steve with a friend in the tranny business.