Cadillac Owners Forum banner

1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
None
Joined
·
325 Posts
I'm I missing something besides the fact that ALL Eldorado's were coupes? Oh, and the rediculiously high asking price?
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
I dunno, I just thought it was an attractive car... You dont see many cars in that good of shape here. haha You know that Kenosha dude.
 

·
Registered
'99 Eldorado 77,000 miles
Joined
·
291 Posts
I don't mean to sound ignorant of Cadillac beauty, but I did not like that body style! That said, it does look like it's in good condition.
 

·
Registered
None
Joined
·
325 Posts
That's not ignorrant at all, it's your own personal opinion. One that I agree with, the '79 and on Eldo's weren't what they once were, GM downsized them too much.
 

·
Registered
97 SLS & 06 STS-4 Cadillac
Joined
·
62 Posts
16MPG maybe?

I had a 88 eldo 18MPG and only like 165hp. Had it 15yrs. The 97 SLS Nstar gets 24 MPG @ 275HP and performs a lot better. My 06 STS V6 gets about 21MPG @265 hp? its nice but I drive the 97 daily..

The old Cads just didn't/weren't very efficient on fuel or power.

Shawn
 

·
Registered
'99 Eldorado 77,000 miles
Joined
·
291 Posts
Exactly... These Caddys just aren't what I'd consider the classics...

I'd like to think that the 90s body style would be a classic some day, but that's doubtful. lol
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top