I don't understand this. Dealers are privately owned and operated. They are the manufacturers customers. We in turn are the dealers customers. Why get rid of them. They are not an expense as far as I can tell. What am I missing here?
Lets say you sell chicken. Say you sell your chicken to 30 stores, and all those stores are within the same square mile. Suddenly those stores are selling your chicken for 5 cents a piece just to be competitive. You end up having to subsidize this discounted chicken.I don't understand this. Dealers are privately owned and operated. They are the manufacturers customers. We in turn are the dealers customers. Why get rid of them. They are not an expense as far as I can tell. What am I missing here?
To put it simpler, there's a saturation of GM dealers in the country.Supply is out of sync with demand.
No, he doesn't. You just gave him 15 cents to unload it so you can clear out the crap sitting in your factory parking lots. If you keep losing money on each vehicle, you need to raise the value of the car by adjusting the supply to meet demand. Fewer dealers means fewer franchise agreements and fewer lots to fill with product.Still doesn't make any sense to me. The guy selling my chickens for 5 cents still has to pay me 20 cents.
I don't understand this.
Lets say you sell chicken.
Try a bacon analogy, Jesda.Still doesn't make any sense to me.