Cadillac Owners Forum banner

1 - 14 of 14 Posts

·
Registered
2005 CTS-V, 1994 Infiniti Q45
Joined
·
7,658 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I got to looking on ebay, and the catera seems like a car I wouldnt mind owning...... Id have a hard time getting rid of the Q....... Although, it is hard to avoid a 6000 price for a 1998 model with around 70k on a CADILLAC!!

Anyway, how does this car perform, handle etc...... Are there common problems?? I noticed while doing research it uses timing belts, which could mean disaster without previous owner maintenance...... Id like something with about the same acceleration, definitely no less than the Q.....

So, what is the consensus........ Would I like it, or should I keep the Q.........???
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,622 Posts
well the catera has a 3.0 V6 with 200hp(i dunno what the Q has) and a 4 speed auto with sport-shift. Its RWD(yay) with an IRS suspesion. I think they are very nice cars, but others dont. Alot have the Bose system and all that good stuff. Also in euroland( :D ) its called either Opel or Vaxal(sp) Omega, i cant remember witch. I also have been thinking about getting one but i dont know if a car payment would be a wise more for me now.

PS. its time for you to step outa the dark and into the light(get a caddy already! :tisk: )
 

·
Registered
2005 CTS-V, 1994 Infiniti Q45
Joined
·
7,658 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Hehe......

I cant really live with anything but RWD...... So that excludes all northstar and 4.9 models....... Nothing older than 92...... So that leaves the fleetwood and the catera....... And personally, something would be wrong about a 17 year old driving a fleetwood......

Although, big back seats have endless possibilities :eyebrow:
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonofhomer

·
Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
I just got a 1998 Catera about 2 weeks ago now, but it was only previously owned as a fleet vehicle in Naples Florida (huge retirement home/city) so even after 5 years it only has 32k miles on it. I must say that in the 2 weeks ive had it so far ive been very impressed, great handling and performance and a very smooth ride, though I should mention that the only cars I can compare this too are my '94 jeep cherokee and '96 chevy cavalier ;) . Even so, I have on occasion driven a friends BMW or Mercedes and this car definatly has the same kind of feel too it.
 

·
Registered
2003 Cadillac DeVille
Joined
·
397 Posts
elwesso said:
Hehe......

I cant really live with anything but RWD...... So that excludes all northstar and 4.9 models....... Nothing older than 92...... So that leaves the fleetwood and the catera....... And personally, something would be wrong about a 17 year old driving a fleetwood......

Although, big back seats have endless possibilities :eyebrow:
Dream on wesley.

I say go for it. Thats a pretty good price for a sporty Caddy. And it'll be about time you joined the club!
 

·
Registered
2005 CTS-V, 1994 Infiniti Q45
Joined
·
7,658 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
Ill keep my eyes out..... Im not in a hurry, and Ill wait until a really good one comes around.......
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,753 Posts
Ive looked at the catera because the cts has basically the same engine. The cars were made by opel and were depreciation disasters, so you can get one in good shape for a good price. Impossible to tune and very little aftermarket stuff for it if your into that stuff. Reliable enough, but now that they stopped making them ive heard horror stories about people trying to find parts. All in all its not gonna be a dream cadillac but it wouldnt be a bad choice either.

And jeez el i remember when u had like 500 posts your almost at 2700 now!
 

·
Registered
2005 CTS-V, 1994 Infiniti Q45
Joined
·
7,658 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
I dont think Ill be going for the catera anytime soon..... I think it would be a downgrade to what I have now.....

And yes, I post a LOT... I just try not to go out of my way to post..... So im not considered a post whore.......
 

·
Registered
Cadillac
Joined
·
712 Posts
They are junk money pits stay away
Sadly I agree. The cars are money pits to the extreme! Just look at the general trends of the posts on here. I repeat don't buy one. It will kiss you sweetly on the lips, but screw you in the end. At about 60k, things happen.

But that said, the car is comfortable to drive. Sound system is very good. Kind of overweight and underpowered. Ideal for grandma to drive.

I repeat, don't buy one.
 

·
Registered
2007 Cadillac STS 1SG 2001 Cadillac Catera Sport
Joined
·
139 Posts
They are CRAPTERAS i own a 2001 sport white loaded i put crome limited wheels on it and another 3000.00 in everthing on this car yeah its alright but its never ending money pit anyone in your proper mind run dont buy one
 

·
Registered
Platinum 2001 Cadillac Catera Sport
Joined
·
1,840 Posts
I fell in love with the Catera when it debuted in 1996 and blown away by the Steinmetz Concept Car in 1999. Smaller, sportier, and more agile than any Cadillac ever the Catera was different from all the American FWD junk out there. I wanted one but I quickly gave up on the idea. At over $30,000 the Catera was too rich for my blood at the time, what with alimony, child support, and all. Plus Cadillac's stupid Ziggy promotion made a joke of the car before it had a chance to establish itself in the market. Not even Cindy Crawford's ad presence could make up for that. Why would I buy a car that wasn't respected by its own division?

The Catera wasn't a homegrown Cadillac project. GM saw the success that foreign automakers were enjoying in the US sport sedan niche and decided they wanted a piece of the pie. It was "suggested" to Cadillac that it quickly fashion a sporty car to attract the Yuppies. They had tried years earlier with the Allante, but even with Pininfarina styling and a NorthStar V8, it was the wrong car. The Seville, while a great looking car, was too big and heavy to pass for a sport sedan. Touring yes, sporting no. Besides, GM wanted a rear drive platform to match the European competition. With no time or money to design and build one themselves nor finding anything suitable they could co-opt from GM's stateside stable, Cadillac searched GM's worldwide holdings and found the Opel/Vauxhall Omega B. Designed and assembled in Germany on a platform by Opel, with a British built V6 engine (used also in some Saturns and Saabs), and a French built GM transmission This was no warmed over Chevy Cavalier. It was a genuine rear drive sport sedan born & bred to fly down the Autobahn and to attack sharp twisting alpine roads. This midsize European executive sedan was the foundation for the Cadillac Catera.

In the early '90s Opel & Vauxhall built a world class super sport sedan based on the rather ordinary Opel Omega A platform. They handed it over to Lotus, then owned by GM, where its 3.0L straight 6 became a 377 HP 3.6L twin-turbocharged 6. Its drivetrain became a ZF 6-speed Corvette transmission with a full blown Lotus tuned suspension. The Opel Lotus-Omega/Vauxhall Lotus-Carlton was the world's fastest production sedan in its time. Top speed was 177 MPH, with 0 - 60 MPH coming in at 5.2 sec. Not only fast and quick but it handled like the Devil's own racer. Before today's electronic traction controls and active suspensions the Lotus-Omega carved its way around "old school style" with skilled feet on the pedals, and quick hands at the wheel and shifter. Tires squealing and smoking said you were doing it right. Obviously Opel had the credentials for building the world class sport sedan which GM wanted the Catera to be. According to GM MediaOnLine 2000:


Launched in the fall of 1996 as a 1997 model, Cadillac Catera is part of a global GM vehicle family that includes the Opel and Vauxhall Omega MV6. Catera was developed as part of a cooperative effort between the Opel Technical Development Center in Germany and Cadillac’s world headquarters in Michigan. It is built at the Adam Opel assembly plant in Ruesselsheim using components from GM’s German, French, British and North American suppliers. Catera Sport joined the lineup in May of 1999 to appeal to the sport-oriented set — buyers with a keen interest in expressive styling as well as the desire for a higher level of handling and control.

With the CTS far from production, and all that sport sedan money slipping through GM's fingers, Cadillac had no choice but to proceed with Omega/Catera project. But who could blame Cadillac for its lack of enthusiasm? The Omega B started development in the late '80s and was in production starting in 1993 so Cadillac had no hand in any of its planning, engineering, or styling. Remember, the Catera hadn't even been proposed at that time. Why would they be thrilled about putting their proud name on someone else's car? To Cadillac's credit, they took the lessons learned from the Catera experiment (plus I'm sure a bit from the Lotus-Carlton) and applied them to making the CTS a true match for the Euro sport sedans when it debuted in 2004.

Extensive testing at Germany's famous Nurburgring racetrack helped the CTS match or surpass Europe's best. One thing Cadillac corrected with the CTS was to include a V8 model. Then came the coupe and performance station wagon versions. Opel had a wagon version of the Omega B but Cadillac passed. Another was to make a true world class high performance car; the CTS-V. The Catera Sport was more of an appearance package. It included a slightly lower, slightly stiffer suspension but the rest was pure show. The Sport had no extra power to back up her looks. The Omega V8 would have fixed that but, naturally, GM killed it shortly before its debut. By the way, CTS originally stood for Catera Touring Sedan. Cadillac won't admit it today but when the CTS was first proposed, that was its name. Just like STS (Seville Touring Sedan) and DTS (Deville Touring Sedan). But that was early during the CTS' development, before the Catera's reputation was ruined and sales plummeted. After that Cadillac down-played the Catera/CTS connection.

Little money was budgeted for new sheet metal to give the Catera a Cadillac family resemblance. A new front bumper cover (incorporating fog and cornering lights), a Cadillac styled front grille, and a trunk lid with LED center brake light strip, were it for the exterior. Oddly, the trunk got a rear light treatment that joined the corner rear light housings via a reflector/light panel spanning the width of the trunk lid. Very un-Cadillac. Next came the Omega Elite's leather interior and near luxury comforts. Major changes to the Omega's engine management system were also needed to convert it to America's OBDII. Not yet satisfied, Cadillac ordered still more revisions before this altered Opel Omega B became the new Cadillac Catera.

And what other revisions did Cadillac order? Its engineers instructed Opel to add 400 lbs. in "chassis reinforcements and sound deadening" for a “Cadillac feel”. To de-tune the engine from 220HP down to 200HP, to govern the top speed to 125MPH from 150MPH, to delete the 5-speed manual transmission, in addition to passing on the limited slip differential option. Cadillac ordered calibrating of the Omega suspension from autobahn firm to boulevard soft. The suspension was originally meant to be identical to the Omega MV6 but Cadillac nixed it and ordered the softer standard tune. It was still firmer than the usual Cadillac but not what you'd call sporty.

Granted, the chassis reinforcements were needed to pass Federal crash tests but adding weight while taking away power was just plain stupid. Heavier than the Omega by 400 lbs. but without its 220 HP? By rights the Catera should have had 20 HP more than the Omega just to maintain parity. And no 5-speed manual transmission? Why? Their target buyers were young people looking for driving excitement not seniors with arthritic knees. Drivers, not occupants. What happened to "the sport-oriented set — buyers with a keen interest in expressive styling as well as the desire for a higher level of handling and control"? No mention of increased power but with no American "autobahn" available handling and control are more relevant. North America has more than its fair share of mountains and hill countries. So why didn't we get the MV6 suspension they alluded to? Controlling the shifts with a stick and clutch would've been nice too.

Why did Cadillac water down Opel's design? Who knows. Maybe, it being a rushed project, they relied on their existing customer database and, erring on the side of caution, tailored the car to fit past buyers. Maybe they asked potential sport sedan buyers what they'd like in an American sport sedan but didn't trust their answers. Why were sales down from expectations? Initially sales were good ('97 - 25,411/'98 - 24,635) but "Ziggy the Duck"? "The Caddy That Zigs"? A cartoon character and a cute catch-phrase? You don't impress potential buyers by talking down to them. Plus several mechanical issues, resulting in a 1999 recall, tainted the Catera's reputation. By the time Cadillac realized their mistakes, addressing the oil cooler and timing belt tensioner, plus upgrading to Omega MV6 kit with the Catera Sport, it was too late. The buying public stayed away in droves.

Catera production ended in 2001. European production of the Omega continued until 2003. There are rumors that a few 2002 Cateras made it to the US. One was supposedly sighted in or near Chicago by a forum member equipped with the upgraded 3.2L V6 that was used in the CTS and a 5 speed manual transmission but it was never verified. "If they're ain't no pictures it didn't happen". An Omega V8 with a 5.0 Liter Chevy Small Block (LS1) and a 5 speed Corvette manual transmission was ready for production and weeks away from debut when GM canceled it due to engine cooling problems. Huh? Hadn't they been cooling that engine since 1955?

Compared to the Ford Taurus SHO, the only car close to being an American sport sedan at the time, the under powered Catera was still a sport sedan but the souped up Taurus wasn't its real competition. The SHO was more of a FWD muscle car and not meant to handle like the European sport sedans. Ford saw the light same as GM and introduced the Lincoln LS6 and LS8 which were within the Catera's design parameters but a little more on the luxury side than sport. GM was looking to compete against the foreign models sold here like the Mercedes C280 and BMW 328i, all RWD. Audi's A6 too, specifically the all wheel drive Quattro version. Jaguar had the XJ6 but it was more touring than sport. Acura, Lexus, and Infiniti had sport sedans too but not in the requisite RWD. Saab too but being a GM holding it wasn't counted as competition.

In the '80s Ford tried to transplant the "Ford of Germany" (FoG) Sierra and XR4Ti (Sport Sedan and Coupe) into the American market. Both were good performance cars. Ford's failure was in their marketing. They would have sold better as Mercurys like the very successful '70s Capri, also from FoG. Instead the Sierra and XR4Ti were sold here under the Merkur banner. New cars from a new division? No, they were cars already in production at FoG but unknown in the "States". Americans were confused. Many of the simpler-minded couldn't even pronounce the name. Americans are a suspicious bunch so few bought them. Our loss.

The car magazines often mention the Catera, along with the Cimarron, as one of the worst Cadillacs ever but that's not fair. The Cimarron was a Chevrolet Cavalier, 4 cylinder "Iron Duke" engine and all, trimmed to look like a Cadillac. They later fitted it with a 2.8L V6 but made no other substantive changes to improve the car and justify the price they were asking. It was an economy car, poorly built, with none of the Cadillac excellence buyers expected. The Opel Omega was an executive sedan designed with the Autobahn and Alpine roads in mind. Unfortunately Cadillac de-tuned them for the American roads they assumed this reworked Omega would encounter. So that, plus the Elite's leather interior, a few Cadillac badges, and some body colored trim, turned them into Cateras. Lightyears better than the Cimarrons but once the connection was made nothing, not even the facelift and Sport versions could remove the stink. Not saying the Catera didn't have problems just that she wasn't the fraud that the Cimarron was. If Cadillac was truly serious about competing against BMW, MB, et al they would have fixed the problems.
 

·
Registered
Platinum 2001 Cadillac Catera Sport
Joined
·
1,840 Posts
As for those problems, if you want a Catera shop carefully. Within days of buying mine, in November 2006 at 48,000 miles, I had to have the Heater Bypass Valve replaced after it puked most of the engine's coolant. I didn't do my homework. Had I known about the Catera's inherent problems I'd have had the dealer inspect and replace it prior to my taking possession. I saw a pretty car at a great price. A BMW in Cadillac trim. I later had the leaking camcover gaskets replaced. The crankcase breather was clogged, forcing oil past the gaskets, and onto the exhaust heatshields where it smoldered. Two years later the Crankshaft Position Sensor (CPS) failed and left me stranded. AAA to the rescue. The '97 - '98 Cats had the most problems. Some were addressed, but not necessarily cured, in '99. The 2000 - 2001 models are less trouble prone but not perfect. When you find a Catera that looks good on the outside, here's what to look for on the inside.

• Have Cadillac check the VIN for the cam-belt tensioner bulletin #02041A. This is critical. If the tensioner seizes the belt will break and the pistons will bend the valves. All 24 of them. This service must be done every 5 years/50,000 miles or sooner.

• Replace the Crankshaft Position Sensor (CPS). If it fails your Catera will stall and not restart until the sensor cools. Eventually it will quit altogether and strand you. Located by the oil filter, it's easy to replace and fairly inexpensive.

• Check the engine oil for coolant contamination. It will appear as a cream colored emulsion residue under the oil filler cap and maybe the dipstick. Wipe it off and drive the car at operating temp for 30 minutes. If it doesn't reappear it was probably normal water condensation and boiled off. If it reappears it could be antifreeze in the oil. Another indicator is oil in the coolant reservoir. They all mean the oil cooler is leaking and needs replacement. Left alone it will burn your engine's bearings and clog the radiator and heater core. A laborious but relatively cheap repair (for a Cadillac) if you do it yourself. Improved coolers were introduced in '99.

• With the engine running, check the coolant tank for bubbles or an exhaust smell. That's probably a blown head gasket. It's not that common but does happen. We suspect worn out coolant is to blame. Acids in the coolant attack the gaskets.

• Have the Heater Bypass Valve (HBV) behind the engine replaced. It's not expensive as Cadillac parts go and the labor is DIY easy. If you wait and it leaks it will puke all your coolant. When that happens it can also damage the DIS ignition pack on the '97-'98s.

• The cam cover gaskets can leak and drip oil on the exhaust heatshields and create smoke. This is too expensive to leave to Cadillac. They charged me $750 including the gaskets. Order the gaskets and have a trusted local garage do the work or DIY. Cleaning the crankcase breather relieves the excess crankcase pressure that blows oil past the gaskets so clean it out.

• Check for tire wear front & rear. Cupping or feathered edges indicates worn/split front & rear control arm suspension bushings. OEM replacement bushings are available as well as some polyurethane substitutes. New front suspension arms come with the stock bushings and ball joints already installed so that's an option too. Whichever fix you choose you'll need for a 4 wheel alignment. There's an aftermarket camber eccentric bolt available that will extend the front camber adjustment's range by +/- 2 degrees over stock to help bring it to where the tires wear more evenly. Using 2 bolts per side will give you +/- 4 degrees. Eccentric rear suspension bushings for the last Pontiac GTO or Omega, adjustable for camber and toe-in, will do the same for those tires.

There are other things like weak door stays, cracked brake light switches, EBTCM failure, cracked radiator caps, and HVAC control malfunctions. Search the forums for more info. Most irritating are the computer gliches and sensor failures which leave you stalled and stranded. Given the level of electronics in cars today and the harsh environment they operate in I doubt the Catera is worse than other cars. A failure is never an easy thing to endure but this is the 21st century and electronic controls are here to stay. Thanks to the database, on this and other Catera/Omega sites, information is available and you can go to your chosen service facility armed with knowledge.

I mention these things in the interest of honesty. My car has suffered the HBV, CPS, radiator leak, and EBTCM failure. That causes the ABS and TC systems to fail and lights their alarms in addition to killing the speedometer, cruise control, and power steering's variable assist. The EBTCM can be removed and sent to repair with no affect to normal braking. I did have the timing belt & tensioner replaced, the lower control arms (replacing their front/horizontal bushings with polyurethane ones), the anti-rollbar bushings with polyurethane ones, all the cooling system hoses, all filters, and the cam cover gaskets, but they were all maintenance items.

That's the point. The Catera has many faults but a lot of her "problems" are mostly lack of proper upkeep. Owners neglect the car's regular maintenance and blame her when something goes wrong. My Catera Sport scoots like her tail was on fire, handles like she's on rails, and stops on a dime. I drive her hard like I'm sure many of you do and that's taking a chance if you don't address past abuses. Don't forget, most of these cars are over 10 years. Lots of potential problems waiting to bite us in the ass if the previous owners didn't do the scheduled maintenance properly and timely. You want a more dependable Catera? Then you'll have to bring her neglected maintenance up to date.

Sounds bleak doesn't it? Don't get me wrong. It's not all gloomy. I'm just a "bad news first" type of guy. I love my Catera. I bought it in 2006. Some call the styling dated and bland. Sue me. I like it. It's soft and streamlined compared to the new edgy origami-like stealth fighter look Cadillac is pushing nowadays. And what about the "Japanesque" type styling the Germans have adopted with all sorts of accent lines and weirdness? Just look at the latest Mercedes Benzes and BMWs. They make me gag. The Catera's '97-'99 prefacelift models have an aerodynamic form with a steeply sloped grille and low profile hood. Their rear treatment features full body width tail lights.

The 2000 model, sometimes mistakenly called the Omega C, introduced facelifted front & rear facias, side mirrors, as well as a restyled interior. The grille was more upright with a slightly raised hood for a more formal look that better matched the rest of the Cadillac line. The rear lost the full width lightbar and gained separate corner units with LED turn signals. Not quite the traditional razor thin Cadillac "Tail-Fin" lights but closer to them than full width lights. The Catera was never a big seller here so there is nothing in the way of aftermarket styling upgrades beyond custom wheels and some tacky chrome body trim. There is still some body stuff from Irmscher, Steinmetz, and others in Europe for the Omega that will fit the Catera but it's rapidly becoming scarce.

The Catera has a roomy, comfortable cockpit for the driver and I never hear the passengers complain (except for the poor unfortunate stuck in the middle). I frequently spend 6 hours or more behind the wheel and arrive without stiffness or sore spots. The front power memory seats are comfortable and supportive with too many adjustments to list (heated too). I just wish they had bigger side bolsters. All Catera front seats were made by Recaro. Some came with Sport Seats equipped with manual adjustments, extendable thigh support, and thick side bolsters. Some cars came with heated rear seats as well. Even the side mirrors are heated. The HVAC has separate driver and passenger zones. The steering wheel tilts and has remote stereo control buttons. The cruise controls are on a separate stalk to the left of the wheel. The leather interior's styling is clean without Cadillac's traditional bordello plushness. It's very Teutonic. There were few options as the Catera was well appointed but there was an available sunroof, a power rear window sunshade, and of course the Sport package. The standard stereo was good but the optional Bose system was better.

And then there's the Catera's performance. Compared to her direct competitors, like the BMW 5 series, our Catera is overweight (3770 lb.) and underpowered (200 hp.) so 0 to 60 times suffered (8.5 seconds) but that only counts if you're planning to race her. For normal, and even slightly illegal, street driving she is a joy. In the transmission's Sport Mode the Catera accelerates quickly (once above 40 MPH) so watch the speedometer. You'll be doing 90 MPH before you know it. This engine loves to rev. She's a little thirsty though (17mpg - city/24mpg - highway). She'll drink Regular (86 octane) but really comes alive on Premium (94 octane). The ECM adjusts the ignition timing accordingly using knock sensors. In 1999 the engine received updates like a Fly By Wire (FBW) throttle and Multi Ram Induction that carried over until production ended in 2001. Multi Ram Induction is a system of butterfly valves and passages that manage air flow through the plenum for the best performance. Before 1999 it was called Dual Ram Induction. The new system added more passages to better manage air flow for optimum efficiency. FBW throttle is controlled by your foot but through the ECM via a Throttle Position Servo so that there is no hard connection to the gas pedal. The advantages? I'm not sure.

The 4L30-E 4 speed electronic transmission shifts smoothly and has a Sport Mode that lets the engine rev close to redline before shifting to squeeze every horse out of it. The transmission uses what Cadillac calls adaptive logic but what that means, I haven't a clue. Some owners lament the lack of a 5 speed manual transmission but this automatic isn't a bad consolation prize. It has its quirks but generally gives good service with quick sharp shifts, up or down, plus the option of hitting the Sport button when you want that extra pop. The transmission can't be too pedestrian. BMW, among others, used it in their cars.

The transmission also has a Winter Mode (the mysterious Snowflake button) that locks out 1st and 2nd gears for 3rd gear standing starts with less torque to the wheels for better traction in snow & ice. It can only be activated when stopped and disengages automatically above 30 MPH. It doesn't work as well as we'd like but our cars are light in the rear so they're at a disadvantage. The Winter Mode works better if you use real snow tires instead of all season tires and pack some sand bags in the trunk. Be sure to anchor them to the rear shock towers to stop them from shifting and keep that weight over the rear axle. Snow tires and sand bags. Not a magic bullet cure, just better.

If you prefer a sportier ride and sharper handling then you want a 2000 - 2001 Catera Sport. Cadillac finally delivered on the full Opel MV6 suspension they promised at the beginning. It's stiffer, but not harsh, and tuned for the backroads. There is less body roll than with the standard Catera and the Sport's wider 235/45-17 low profile tires (standard size was 225/55HR16) keep the car planted. There was a 1999 Catera Sport but it was an intermediate step to this one. The '99 Sport had firmer damping and stiffer springs that became the 2000 Catera's base suspension. Even firmer and stiffer components were used for the 2000 Sport. The '99 Sport had unique 16 inch alloy wheels, front Recaro Sport Seats, re-contoured rocker panels, and a rear wing. The 2000 - 2001 Sports came with a satin silver grille instead of chrome, unique 5 spoke 17 inch alloy wheels, a rear wing, satin silver interior trim in place of the standard faux wood, and exclusive HID headlights for superior lighting. Magazine road testers at the time praised the 2000 Catera Sport and called it comparable to Europe's best.

Other than the K&N style intakes that add a raspy howl, but little performance, and a few free flowing mufflers there's not much engine stuff here for an orphan like the Catera. Check for Vauxhall/Opel stuff on British and German Ebay but remember, the Catera uses a unique ECM so Omega performance chips won't work. There are owners exploring V8 engine swaps but those are still in the project stage (except for the magnificent 7.0 liter/500 HP V8 Lingenfelter Catera) and a shadetree V8 install I found on Ebay. Some owners have fabricated true cold air intakes for a breath of fresh air. At the rear they're trashing the original twin mufflers for crossover X pipes and high flow glass-pack mufflers, but keeping the large resonator at the rear. Just what performance gains, if any, I don't know but they sound great if that's what you're after.

Improved handling is available via the aftermarket for any year Catera, Sport or otherwise. Suspension upgrades include stiffer Eibach, Vogtland, or Intrax lowering springs plus Koni, KYB, or Bilstein struts & shocks. GTO springs, front & rear, will fit along with its rear shocks, but not the struts. Suspension tower braces are available from Germany or the UK. Believe it or not polyurethane bushings for the BMW M5 and Pontiac GTO/Holden Monaro will fit the Catera. I bought a set made for for the Omega from SuperFlex in the UK. They greatly improve steering response and handling. Polyurethane bushings extend replacement intervals over the original rubber ones. Some also allow fine tuning of alignment specs for the normally nonadjustable rear suspension.

The Catera's brakes are good and compare well with equivalent sport sedans but can be made even better. Luckily the last ever Pontiac GTO and the Catera shared some Opel ancestry. The dual piston front brake calipers & hoses from the 2004 Pontiac GTO are a direct bolt-on. A big improvement over the Catera's smaller single piston units. Load them with C5 Corvette high performance brake pads. They provide a larger friction zone than the GTO's pads and are a straight swap.

As I said before, I love my Catera. The engine performance, the handling, the comfort, the styling, all of it. But don't let my enthusiasm sway you. She does have issues. It all boils down to this: If you're looking for a dependable daily driver, the kind of car you can park and forget at the end of the day. One whose maintenance schedule you can ignore. A car you can subject to abuse, then the Catera isn't for you. If you want a true German "driver's car" that, like a thoroughbred horse, requires regular grooming then ..............

Giddy-Up.
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Top