Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I don't like the front look, it's ugly, but the rear is similar to the CTS.
I think the front looks good - the whole car looks good, although I wish the lines were a little sharper and more defined along the side.Rauf said:I don't like the front look, it's ugly, but the rear is similar to the CTS.
I don't think there is anything wrong with that, the CTS should/could be more sized like the g35/a4/3series/tl/IS and it would in turn handle better and be faster. And as for not having a v8, i'm sure the engineers would find a way to shoehorn the two extra cyl's into the engine bay, no problem for the V seriesCVP33 said:Looks like the GM interiors are getting better. My fear is that this is the next CTS. I say fear because it doesn't appear there's room for a V8. I know GM is looking to down size the CTS somewhat to differentiate the STS.
As it very well should, it's based on the same platform But I belive it's distinctive enough to be accepted as a caddy, let's just hope it's light enough to have excellent FWD performanceFSU_Noles said:Looks a lot like a Saab 9-3 to me, of course, with the addition of the Cadillac cues.
Tks - didn't know that. I knew that the Saab was on the same platform as the Malibu but didn't know what else shared the platform. Hard to believe the malibu and 9-3 are the same platform. Good ole chevy styling....AsAkAs said:As it very well should, it's based on the same platform But I belive it's distinctive enough to be accepted as a caddy, let's just hope it's light enough to have excellent FWD performance
The turbo V6 is the 2.8L variant that Saab is now using in the 9-3 as well, similar HP output to the 3.6L V6Night Wolf said:So they are really making this thing....
I like it too... but the grille.. the holes are too big, they need to add some bars to it.
turbo V6... is this gonna be like a BMW 3 series or something? then what about the CTS? how do they come into play?