Double check and make sure. The first time I treated an AGM battery like a flooded lead acid battery, by charging it with a regular charger, I burned it up quickly. It started gassing and heating up. I did a little reading on it immediately after that incident and discovered that the particular AGM battery I had (Sears Platinum) was restricted to a 13.6v charge rate, and most non AGM oriented chargers, charge at upwards of 16-18 volts at the clamps from my own multimeter check. Usually modern chargers on the market today will have an AGM specific charge setting.The 14.5 volts that the CTS charges is well within the charging parameters of an AGM battery
They tend to last longer and perform better, although regular SLA works fine.So, is the AGM better to equip with?
Or what?
X2I'm not looking to start a war here, just stating the obvious.
I still work with auto repair a little and I am not seeing that in new vehicles equipped with AGM batteries. It seems they have them because they need them to support all of the extra and are still being used up in about the same amount of time as non AGM batteries. They're certainly not worth the extra weight they carry along with the hefty price to me.They tend to last longer and perform better, although regular SLA works fine.
Batteries are a well-understood technology. The fact that AGM can source greater current, charge faster, last longer, don't self-discharge as quickly, and recombine unwanted gasses to water are all characteristics proven by industry - not just opinions on a car forum. Our modern charging systems are aware of both voltage and current into and out of the battery, easily accomodating the slightly different charging regime.I still work with auto repair a little and I am not seeing that in new vehicles equipped with AGM batteries. It seems they have them because they need them to support all of the extra and are still being used up in about the same amount of time as non AGM batteries. They're certainly not worth the extra weight they carry along with the hefty price to me.
To be clear, I'm not under the influence of car forum opinions on this subject, I'm not questioning tech performance, I'm going by what I have observed personally. Our smart charging systems knowing battery voltage vs. knowing the required charge specifications of any given battery design (like BMW battery related programming requirements) are two different things.Batteries are a well-understood technology. The fact that AGM can source greater current, charge faster, last longer, don't self-discharge as quickly, and recombine unwanted gasses to water are all characteristics proven by industry - not just opinions on a car forum. Our modern charging systems are aware of both voltage and current into and out of the battery, easily accomodating the slightly different charging regime.
Whether one chooses to pay the price premium is entirely a personal cost/benefit analysis.
![]()
Flooded Lead and AGM Batteries: What's the Difference?
Flooded lead and absorbent glass mat batteries are the most popular storage batteries with hundreds of applications. Here's some differences between them.www.crownbattery.com
This seems to be a common misconception, that it is necessary for a charging system to "know" about slight variations in very similar battery chemistries, and it is necessary the battery configuration (I won't say chemistry, because it's the same) be "programmed" into the charger.Our smart charging systems knowing battery voltage vs. knowing the required charge specifications of any given battery design (like BMW battery related programming requirements) are two different things.
Appreciate the visual, but that charge algorithm chart is for the charging module represented in the link, not necessarily what our non AGM spec cars are programmed to deliver, although reasonable I suppose to assume, even in a car that disables and then recommends servicing power steering when the alternator fails. Not a very convincing "smart charge" system.This seems to be a common misconception, that it is necessary for a charging system to "know" about slight variations in very similar battery chemistries, and it is necessary the battery configuration (I won't say chemistry, because it's the same) be "programmed" into the charger.
That isn't how it works. Battery voltages vary slightly with temperature, and with battery type; SLA, AGM, or Lead/Calcium. Indeed, this is exactly the problem one faces with a dumb charging system. They don't even work well with a single designed battery type, like SLA, as they don't account for voltage variations at different charging stages by measuring current.
Rather than regurgitate widely understood knowledge of battery charging algorithms, I'll post a graph and link. One can do further reading if desired. The short version is, push the voltage up till the current drops. Note that is not "push the voltage up to 14.8V for an SLA battery, or 15.0V for an AGM battery, or 15.0V for an SLA battery at 35F ambient temperature".
![]()
![]()
Guide to charging Sealed Lead Acid Batteries - BRAVA
Each of the above has its advantages and disadvantages, but using a simple charger designmay not be cost effective in the long term. Checking batterywww.bravabatteries.com
The battery determines what charging algorithm is appropriate. The algorithm shown is fairly universal across various chargers, because lead acid batteries want similar charging behavior. Which you would know if you looked into the subject.Appreciate the visual, but that charge algorithm chart is for the charging module represented in the link, not necessarily what our non AGM spec cars are programmed to deliver, although reasonable I suppose to assume, even in a car that disables and then recommends servicing power steering when the alternator fails. Not a very convincing "smart charge" system.
Dont do any good if you don't have a garage and can't plug it in...Battery maintainers.
Worth every penny.
You're not wrong there.Dont do any good if you don't have a garage and can't plug it in...