Joined
·
161 Posts
Thanks for the input everyone gave on my previous strut replacement post.
Another question that maybe someone can help me with. I've been scouring the net looking at passive strut systems. I found something interesting - apparently AC/Delco has a passive front and rear system available for the '98 STS.
GM part number is 88946635 for the rear PAIR of shocks. At GM Parts Direct the price with S/H comes out to be $87.36.
GM part number is 88985526 for each front strut. At GM Parts Direct the price with S/H for a pair is $130.71.
For the math challenged, that would be $218.07 total for a complete set of four. Has anyone out there ever purchased and installed these? I'm not too concerned with codes based on Krashed's advice with the damper plates, but I'd like to see if anyone else has taken the plunge and get some feedback first on ride quality and installation compatibility. This seems like a great deal if they are indeed compatible. Less money than Boston Suspension, Arnott Industries and Strutmasters. Plus it's OEM, so that would seem to make more sense, no?
Another question that maybe someone can help me with. I've been scouring the net looking at passive strut systems. I found something interesting - apparently AC/Delco has a passive front and rear system available for the '98 STS.
GM part number is 88946635 for the rear PAIR of shocks. At GM Parts Direct the price with S/H comes out to be $87.36.
GM part number is 88985526 for each front strut. At GM Parts Direct the price with S/H for a pair is $130.71.
For the math challenged, that would be $218.07 total for a complete set of four. Has anyone out there ever purchased and installed these? I'm not too concerned with codes based on Krashed's advice with the damper plates, but I'd like to see if anyone else has taken the plunge and get some feedback first on ride quality and installation compatibility. This seems like a great deal if they are indeed compatible. Less money than Boston Suspension, Arnott Industries and Strutmasters. Plus it's OEM, so that would seem to make more sense, no?