Joined
·
152 Posts
Went for a drive today. I really like driving my CTS! Here are some shots I took with my new camera (Canon SX10 IS).
Attachments
-
144.6 KB Views: 190
-
116.4 KB Views: 240
-
145.1 KB Views: 229
Hey Bro, great pic's. Awesome car. :cool2:
Thanks, exm! Did you hear that, GM? Here's a 37 year old who says he likes the look of the new BUICK! It is indeed a new day!!wayne, im with you, i like the buick's as well . . . your car is beautiful and just what i would like mine to look like if i did those sorts of mods . . . great taste
Wayne, you are right on that one! And I also love all the content. The new LaCrosse has a list of amazing options that just doesn't quit for the price. The only thing that seemed odd was the non-option of AWD with the CXS package. I found that really odd.
Thanks, allklr! I agree! The CTS-V should have this look!Very sharp, The CTS-V should have had those quad pipes.
No argument here! The LaCrosse surely isn't in the same league. But if I wasn't looking for world class performance, it appears to be a potential alternative (in all wheel drive) to the CTS and doesn't come across as lame.Not to state the obvious, but the CTS offers rear wheel drive and the world class Sigma platform. The Lacrosse is FWD, and is based on the Opel Vectra, which is a nice enough car, and much improved over the previous edition, but it is built to a much lower price point, and is not meant to compete with CTS, BMW 3 series, etc. The original Lacrosse was the replacement for the Regal, though it looks like they're trying to move it upmarket a bit. It may have lots of nice options and gadgets, but it's basic bones are not in the same class as the CTS, nor will it be nearly as sporty to drive.