Cadillac Owners Forum banner
  • BEWARE OF SCAMMERS. Anyone trying to get your money should be checked out BEFORE you send anything anywhere.
21 - 40 of 56 Posts
Super Cruise and Google Maps are two completely independent technologies. I can't think of reason that they should need to share information. Super Cruise just enables the feature when it detects that a vehicle is driving on an approved section of highway. It should work irregardless of what navigation software is being used.
 
Super Cruise and Google Maps are two completely independent technologies. I can't think of reason that they should need to share information. Super Cruise just enables the feature when it detects that a vehicle is driving on an approved section of highway. It should work irregardless of what navigation software is being used.
True, now that I think about it. SuperCruise does not navigate from Point A to Point B, it provides driving assistance for the road you are on at the time, similar to standard cruise control. I've not used it, but as I recall I've not seen anything that ties SuperCruise to actual navigation.
 
True, now that I think about it. SuperCruise does not navigate from Point A to Point B, it provides driving assistance for the road you are on at the time, similar to standard cruise control. I've not used it, but as I recall I've not seen anything that ties SuperCruise to actual navigation.
Supercruise uses HD maps provided by www.ushrauto.com . Kyle Conner from Out of Spec Reviews recently tried out Supercruise at
 
@larryjwhite nice review, thanks for posting it. GM has posted the new maps, and I was able to confirm that about 70% of my daily commute is covered including a good portion of 2 lane secondary road. The more I read and see reviews of SC the more excited I become about it. At first I was "oh, that's nice its included" but now its one of the features I'm most looking forward to trying out.
 
IMO electric cars are not going to work for normal people who actually go places. These things will work for running errands around town and that's about it. Until they're a few years old and the batteries start going bad. Then I don't know what you do. I can't see electric vehicles ever being a viable option for the average person. If you got the money and like toys, sure get one as a second car, but not for your primary vehicle. The reason why you're not getting the info you want is because if you did, you would likely change your mind.
 
IMO electric cars are not going to work for normal people who actually go places. These things will work for running errands around town and that's about it. Until they're a few years old and the batteries start going bad. Then I don't know what you do. I can't see electric vehicles ever being a viable option for the average person. If you got the money and like toys, sure get one as a second car, but not for your primary vehicle. The reason why you're not getting the info you want is because if you did, you would likely change your mind.
Who do you think your messaging on this board? Are we not normal people who actually go places?😂 I’m already looking forward to my road trips in the car
 
IMO electric cars are not going to work for normal people who actually go places. .
To be fair, I agreed with you until recently when the charging infrastructure improved moderately and the range increased to a reasonable amount, with decent fast charging rates. Right now, the only difference between a trip in ICE and EV is charging vs fueling times. On moderately long trips (say 500 to 700 miles) the expected differential can be planned away based on your driving style.

If, for example, I was driving by myself (no extended stops, only fuel stops) an EV would increase that length for me by 1 to 2 hours, if I'm using a practical range of 225 miles. If driving with my family (more frequent and extended stops, at least 1 and possibly 2 meal stops of one hour) the well planned trip is almost equal in length.

I say 225 miles as a "practical range" because of these factors:
  • No one drives a vehicle down to 0 miles in range. On average I would say down to 10% to 20% of range is the max. For example, my current DD has a fuel capacity of 13.2 gallons and the best max range I've ever gotten from it was 534.2 miles (40 MPG). Yet in 10 years of driving it and over 205,000 miles the closest to it's potential mileage (calculated by computing max mileage based on that tank's MPG figure and comparing that into actual miles driven) is 90%, with an average of 77.8%. Yea, I track that stuff, I'm that nerdy.
  • Most of my trips are on Interstate highways at [Speed Limit}+8MPH or 80MPH, whichever is less (due to superspeeder laws in the states I most frequently travel). That speed is going to lower my range as demonstrated by the R&T test on the Lyriq.
  • I'll have the AWD version which will also reduce the practical range.
So, in the end, not much there that would keep me from road tripping in a Lyriq.
 
IMO electric cars are not going to work for normal people who actually go places. These things will work for running errands around town and that's about it. Until they're a few years old and the batteries start going bad. Then I don't know what you do. I can't see electric vehicles ever being a viable option for the average person. If you got the money and like toys, sure get one as a second car, but not for your primary vehicle. The reason why you're not getting the info you want is because if you did, you would likely change your mind.
Today, I sort of agree. At least here in the Midwest. The west coast is much more advanced. I will be planning an extensive road trip once I get the Lyriq. Probably next fall just to experience on the road charging. And range anxiety 😁 Eventually there will be greater access to charging. In Indiana I believe on major thoroughfares (Interstates initially) there will be charging stations every 50 miles. Once completed that will be a game changer. Other states are building out charging much the same. Otherwise I’ll be charging in my garage normally.
 
IMO electric cars are not going to work for normal people who actually go places. These things will work for running errands around town and that's about it. Until they're a few years old and the batteries start going bad. Then I don't know what you do. I can't see electric vehicles ever being a viable option for the average person. If you got the money and like toys, sure get one as a second car, but not for your primary vehicle. The reason why you're not getting the info you want is because if you did, you would likely change your mind.
You say this like electric cars are some sort of new fangled invention. There have been electric vehicles being sold with 250 miles of range for close to a decade. Covering 250 miles is about 3.5 hours of straight driving at 70mph. Few people will routinely want to drive that long without stopping at least once for something regardless of whether the vehicle runs on gas or electrons. Most newer EVs recharge to 80% and are ready to get back on the road in under 35mins, often before the passengers are ready to go.

There is a reason that they can't currently make and sell EVs fast enough. Many people are actually doing the math.
 
For the OP, what I think you are going to find is that on longer trips, charging to about 85% or 90% will be the mot efficient time wise. The charge rate is going to drop off dramatically above that rate and likely won't be worth your time to charge higher as compared to getting back on the road.
 
IMO electric cars are not going to work for normal people who actually go places. These things will work for running errands around town and that's about it. Until they're a few years old and the batteries start going bad. Then I don't know what you do. I can't see electric vehicles ever being a viable option for the average person. If you got the money and like toys, sure get one as a second car, but not for your primary vehicle. The reason why you're not getting the info you want is because if you did, you would likely change your mind.
I recently completed a 1500 mile trip in one of my EV’s. I probably spent 2 hours longer charging but that was not a problem. Currently planning a 2500 mile trip with the Lyriq. Granted 500 mile range and 10 minute charging would be great, but what is available today works.
 
It takes less than 3min. to put gas is my car, and I’ve never been not ready to go.
There is a Circle K near where my son lives that it literally takes more than 20 minutes to fill up our Suburban if it is near empty. Must be only a L1 "charger". :)
 
What is the Lyriq’s charging rate towards the end, e.g. after 80% full?

The reason I ask is that I’d like to drive the thousand or so miles from Palo Alto in the SF Bay area up I-5 to Vancouver, BC in the shortest possible time while staying more or less with the traffic. I did that trip in 2017 in a 2017 Bolt Premier, taking 3 days albeit with some detours along the Oregon coast, Mt. St. Helens, and Lake Quinault in the Olympic National Park. Can I do it today in a 2023 Lyriq in 1 day with no detours?

In particular, is it better to stop charging as soon as the Lyriq is drawing less than 190 kW, or to let it charge a bit more in order to reduce the number of stops, or even a lot more?

According to GM, spending ten minutes at each station adds 76 miles while 30 minutes adds 195 miles. Assuming enough 200 kW chargers along the way, for 1000 miles the former needs 1000/76 ~ 13 stops taking 13*10 = 130 minutes while the latter needs only 5 stops taking 30*5 = 150 minutes to charge. At 75 mph the driving time would be 13 hours and 20 minutes. The former’s 130 minutes charging time brings that up to 15 hours and 30 minutes while the latter’s 150 minutes brings it up to 15 hours and 50 minutes.

If that was all there was to it, it would be better to charge every 100 miles or so than every 200 miles.

But this overlooks three things.

1. What is the additional time to drive from I-5 to the station and back, along with the time to connect up and so on?

2. Are there enough 200 kW stations, namely every hundred miles?

3. What does GM mean by ten minutes to add 76 miles? Obviously that can’t be ten minutes to bring the charge from 75% to 100%. So how low does the charge need to be before ten minutes will add 76 miles, and how low before 30 minutes will add 195 miles?

For 2, I checked and was surprised to find that there were enough Electrify America stations in Oregon for that, while in California and Washington there were that plus enough EVgo and Charge Point stations. So that’s not an obstacle to any approach, even the hundred-miles-per-charge approach.

For 3, I should use the last station available before I run out, so as to start the charge from a low percentage. This doesn’t seem to be a problem.

For 1, this is more interesting. The time required to take 13 trips to a station and back, plus connect time, could easily dwarf that for 5 such trips, suggesting that 200 miles is a better spacing.

But in that case, maybe 300 miles is even better, which would only require 3 stops assuming I leave Palo Alto at 5 am at 100% and arrive in Point Grey, Vancouver, BC at say 9 pm at 0% where I can charge to 100% overnight using Level 2.

Thanks to Plugshare, along with the apps for EVgo, Charge Point, and Electrify America, I have almost all the information I need to optimize the trip from Palo Alto, CA to Vancouver, BC. The one missing thing is the rate at which the Lyriq slows its charging as it approaches 100% full. If at 95% it is still charging at say 120 kW then 300 mile spacing between charges might turn out to be better than 200 miles.

So is 300 miles the answer? Or 250? Or 200? Knowing how charging slows as the Lyriq’s Ultium battery approaches 100% would help answer this.

I asked this yesterday on CadillacSociety, so far without any response. In the meantime I looked into it a litttle further and concluded that it would be impossible to get from Palo Alto to Vancouver, BC with fewer than four intermediate stops, one of which would need to be at an Electrify America in Oregon since that seems to be the only network in Oregon with 200 kW stations. (Can we use Tesla Superchargers yet?) I also realized that I could start with 100% full by charging overnight before setting out at 6 am or whatever, but even with that I still needed four intermediate stops.
Don't have one yet, but all that I have read is that you have to factor in that 200KW stations might not work. The EVGO, CP and EA all seem to have maintenance issues. I would do some test charging locally to make sure your app syncs up properly and allows you to charge. Get those worked out before you hit the road.
 
Actually I drove my lyriq to Vegas 280 miles and had to charge as it loses mileage if uphill or over 75 mph. My suggestion is find a fast charger Evgo has some and that really speeds up the charge vsba 5okw charger it's kind of slow
 
21 - 40 of 56 Posts