Here is some interesting info on heads:
http://www.lsxtv.com/forum/cathedral-port-head-technology-2008-a-254.html
http://www.lsxtv.com/forum/cathedral-port-head-technology-2008-a-254.html
I guess we will need to work on making you want new heads sooner rather than later.nice link darkman. That's a good read...and I'm not even after heads in the immediate future.
Those would work fine on an LS6 but you need to make sure they are for a standard bore (3.89" something or other) and see what the runner length is. To big a runner can hurt performance on a stock cube engine. Generally speaking, the bigger intake runner likes more cubes but it depends on if its a track car or something you drive on the street. Since its for a V, I would opt for like a 215cc or maybe a 225cc. Some guys run a 205cc runner and have great success for daily drivers. Those heads flow well also.These are for sale locally....would these work on a V? http://denver.craigslist.org/pts/1083562968.html
Sorry if the question is dumb, I know nothing about this stuff![]()
Staying with a 2.8" pulley and getting a more effiicient H/C setup might help some. Maybe +20-30 hp? (<-- I'm guessing.) I'm not sure if anyone here has done that. I'd think you'd have to have headers to take advantage of the better flow characteristics. A 2.6" pulley would be an even cheaper route than H/C and may yield even more HP increase. An 8-rib/larger crank pulley would also help, but then you're talking maybe more cost than H/C.I was considering doing some heads and a cam on my maggied V, after a couple months when I will need more power. I talked with one very smart motor guy about this the other day. He said that a cam really wouldn't make much of a difference if you have a maggie. He said since you are forcing air into the motor with the maggie, a bigger cam would not be worth the extra $$$. I wanted to get your guys 2cents? Anyone running a cam/maggie setup? What kind of hp# gains did the cam give you?
I really really really hate to threadjack here, but I have to momentarily.I was considering doing some heads and a cam on my maggied V, after a couple months when I will need more power. I talked with one very smart motor guy about this the other day. He said that a cam really wouldn't make much of a difference if you have a maggie. He said since you are forcing air into the motor with the maggie, a bigger cam would not be worth the extra $$$. I wanted to get your guys 2cents? Anyone running a cam/maggie setup? What kind of hp# gains did the cam give you?
Just to clarify, those numbers you're quoting aren't runner length, they're intake port volume. Pretty much every head's intake runner is going to be the same length, but the size of the port is going to have an impact on intake charge velocity help determine how the heads perform. Too big an intake port on a mild engine can hurt performance.Those would work fine on an LS6 but you need to make sure they are for a standard bore (3.89" something or other) and see what the runner length is. To big a runner can hurt performance on a stock cube engine. Generally speaking, the bigger intake runner likes more cubes but it depends on if its a track car or something you drive on the street. Since its for a V, I would opt for like a 215cc or maybe a 225cc. Some guys run a 205cc runner and have great success for daily drivers. Those heads flow well also.
I didn't have a graph to throw up to prove the point like 510, but I was going to say the same thing. The cam is the heart of the engine. Anyone that thinks swapping a stock cam for something more aggressive isn't worthwhile isn't giving useful advice.I really really really hate to threadjack here, but I have to momentarily.
Whoever this "one very smart motor guy" is, he is misinformed or mislearned or whatever you want to call it. Here is a 53rwhp/34rwtq gain from adding just a camshaft to a maggied LS2 TBSS. specs are 215/228 .630/.588 116.
I am not saying this is representative of what you should expect from a cam swap on your maggied motor, just that you may want to get your future advice elsewhere.
Just to clarify, those numbers you're quoting aren't runner length, they're intake port volume. Pretty much every head's intake runner is going to be the same length, but the size of the port is going to have an impact on intake charge velocity help determine how the heads perform. Too big an intake port on a mild engine can hurt performance.
I didn't have a graph to throw up to prove the point like 510, but I was going to say the same thing. The cam is the heart of the engine. Anyone that thinks swapping a stock cam for something more aggressive isn't worthwhile isn't giving useful advice.
lol, ya well those pictures won't be coming online any time soon, i've shot out a few emails, definitely not going back to Speed Inc. :rant2: just wasn't sure if 205cc would be the best for the ls6, i've read that most guys go with 215cc heads... not sure on how big of a difference there is, etc.When I saw this poast was from Rob and the thread title was "Heads", I thought I was going to see some dishonorable discharge type information in here.
But then I remembered that Rob is a stand up, honorable guy that has an insatiable desire to feed his V machine.
Rob, hope all is well on the other side of the world. You contact any of the shops near Shameburg for quotes on the work?
You are close enough that I would go to EPP or Pro Dyno Tech to get all the work done. You could even look into Lingenfelter as they are in Indiana too.lol, ya well those pictures won't be coming online any time soon, i've shot out a few emails, definitely not going back to Speed Inc. :rant2: just wasn't sure if 205cc would be the best for the ls6, i've read that most guys go with 215cc heads... not sure on how big of a difference there is, etc.