Dealer claims they need to drive my ATS-V for an extended length of time (~40 miles) to diagnose a check engine light that was throwing misfire and under boost codes (now cleared and hasn't reappeared), along with shuddering on cold starts. Does that sound right? Seems a little odd / extreme for those specific issues, as I assume the same could be accomplished by letting the car idle or driving it semi-aggressively for a short length of time, if the goal is to warm up the engine before re-checking codes.
My concern is that the risk of something bad happening is far greater when the car is driven further from the dealership and for a longer period time (per the advisor, it may not even be the tech driving it). Perhaps they have insurance that would cover potential incidents, but it may be a gray area depending how far away it occurs, and the opportunity for someone to abuse it seems far greater as well given a longer timespan.
My concern is that the risk of something bad happening is far greater when the car is driven further from the dealership and for a longer period time (per the advisor, it may not even be the tech driving it). Perhaps they have insurance that would cover potential incidents, but it may be a gray area depending how far away it occurs, and the opportunity for someone to abuse it seems far greater as well given a longer timespan.