Cadillac Owners Forum banner
1 - 6 of 55 Posts

· Registered
Unicycle
Joined
·
11,025 Posts
By far one of the easiest engines to do nearly any work on... I'll even go on a limb and say its more easy then the 425 in the '79..... EVERY spark plug is in direct sight and super easy to get to (not so on the 425... anyone that knows that #7 cylinder knows that I mean) and stuff like changing the water pump is just about as easy, if not more easy.... only downside would be something like swapping out the cam, on the Olds, the enigne would have to be pulled. In all the work I did on this... which is basically any and all engine work short of removing valve covers/manifolds.... the most difficult thing was changing the PCV valve, just from the position of the rubber grommet.... a dream to work on.



The 4.9 is a PITA to work on... it really is... even something as simple as spark plugs, are just a PITA... I swear I hate working on that car because there is no room.... I am not looking forward to putting plugs in it tomorrow, it is all done by feel and I don't even remember where the freakin holes are... it really sucks.

Honda/Toyota are typically tought to do any decent work on just because everything is cramped in...

VW has to be the worst.... replacing a freakin water pump on a '94 Jetta 2.0... it was hell... EVERY engine accessory had to come off, the wheel fender thing, air intake, washer fluid thing, THEN the kicker... the freakin timing belt and pully! my gosh I told myself I'll never own a VW for that reason.... well, that and parts are so freakin expensive....

atleast I know that I wont be getting a vehicle more difficult to work on in the futre... the Jeep and 4.0 I6 are pretty stright forward, decent amount of rooom... and, well, the I6 is a nice design in that stuff like plugs and wires are easy to get to... longitudinal mounted so accessories are easy to get to etc...
 

· Registered
Unicycle
Joined
·
11,025 Posts
Stoneage_Caddy said:
wasnt much easier to work on then a mid 70s chevy pickup with an inline 6 .....a close second was the ford , but i hated the carb on those ....

i changed a cylander head on a 88 MR2 once ....wasnt much fun ....

but i havent had the unique displeasure of dealing with a Porche Boxter yet ....i hear plug changes are a adventure that jules verne should have written .....
Dosn't the engine have to be removed on those to change the plugs?

I could imagine Subarus must be interesting too.... I personally really like H-O engines, but in some applications they can be a PITA to work on... like small cars.
 

· Registered
Unicycle
Joined
·
11,025 Posts
Stoneage_Caddy said:
subarus are very easy to work on ....turbos are a little more difficault ....in fact i think outside a VW bug pulling the engine out is prolly easier then any car ever made , easy acess to all bellhouseing bolts ...and there is provisions ot get the plugs out ....
ah ok... I was just thinking back to the horizontally-opposed Lycomings and Contenentials used in A/C and how we kind ahae it easy because the cowling comes off the expose the whole engine... then picturing that in a car and how the sides of the engine bay are right there where the heads are.. spark plugs may be a pain...

I have personally always liked Subaru... dunno why... but I just do. They HAVE mastered the AWD thing... but I kinda have a thing for H-O engines... I think a NA Subaru 5spd in a car would be a nice little car to get around in as a DD..... only thing is, the AWD isn't needed in FL and it just adds weight/less MPG etc... ah well...

Before I got the Olds, the winter car I REALLY wanted, and came close to buying... was a late 80's Subaru Loyale wagon.... 5spd and 4WD. The one I almost bought wasn't 4WD (only FWD) and it needed some work... but if it was in fact 4WD, I would have bought it (since it was going to be a winter car) Thinking back... I am kinda neutral on the feeling... I mean, I didn't get that, but i got the Oldsmobile, which is one of the best cars I could have asked for... but still, that little Subaru was just pretty cool, neat interior, it was a 5spd which I really wanted, and want even more now... and 4WD, which from stories I have heard, those 4WD wagons were nearly unstopable. The fuel-injected Boxer-4 engine was bullet proof... it was a really cool little car.
 

· Registered
Unicycle
Joined
·
11,025 Posts
JefferyG said:
Catera's engine is hard to work on. Everythings in torx for the most part, and a majority of the problems require taking off the upper intake manifold - the white part or taking off the windsheild wiper cowling around it.



My Integra Id say is fairly easy. Our 98 Silverado K1500's not bad with its big engine bay. Most Chevy trucks are easy.

We had an 89 Isuzu Trooper 4cyl, and that had atleast 30 vacuum hoses going to the manifold, it was a real arse.
whats that huge hose/air inleft in front of the radiator?

I too like Torx... very positive grip... the only bad thing is when I get lazy and don't have the proper size, or its a metric screw but all I have is SAE and I say to hell with it and use the closest size I have... it tends to strip the screw.. and then its really a PITA... not fun anymore...
 

· Registered
Unicycle
Joined
·
11,025 Posts
danbuc said:
This is one of the easiest cars I've ever worked on. It's the 289c.i. V8 that was in the '66 Mustang I had.


Of course, this would be the L37 N* in my STS. One of the hardest cars I've had the pleasure of working on.


I would have to say thoguh, that the hardest car I've worked on to date, would be my friends 1976 Triumph TR6. The dual carb setup is nightmare to tune. All of the electronics were designed by the Prince of Darkenss (Lucas). Overall, it's just not that much fun to work on.


Hehe, You know your working on an old british car when......the voltage regulator on the back of the alternator bursts into flames while trying to charge the battery. That was fun.
POSITIVE ground!!!!
 
1 - 6 of 55 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top