yeah, not so much.
F
F
:bigroll:I would not wait for the 2010 model. It might not happen in a V. GM is going to trim big time and a low production model with bad gas mileage is going to get it first.
Money spent is money gone. If eliminating the V's will make the bottom line better (e.g., moving marketing dollars and production costs to a more marketable product) then they will do it, regardless of how much money has already been spent. GM currently has two high-dollar gas guzzlers (the Corvette and the CTS-V). They might decide having two is not a good thing.GM's not going to spend millions of dollars developing this car and then cut production after 1 year.
Bet you money the V will be around for 2010.Money spent is money gone. If eliminating the V's will make the bottom line better (e.g., moving marketing dollars and production costs to a more marketable product) then they will do it, regardless of how much money has already been spent. GM currently has two high-dollar gas guzzlers (the Corvette and the CTS-V). They might decide having two is not a good thing.
That's a gigantic and, probably unlikely, "if."Money spent is money gone. If eliminating the V's will make the bottom line better (e.g., moving marketing dollars and production costs to a more marketable product) then they will do it, regardless of how much money has already been spent. GM currently has two high-dollar gas guzzlers (the Corvette and the CTS-V). They might decide having two is not a good thing.
The V is made on the CTS production line, so unless they plan on shutting down the CTS, the V is safe.Money spent is money gone. If eliminating the V's will make the bottom line better (e.g., moving marketing dollars and production costs to a more marketable product) then they will do it, regardless of how much money has already been spent. GM currently has two high-dollar gas guzzlers (the Corvette and the CTS-V). They might decide having two is not a good thing.
The Vette is not a "gas guzzler" in the sense that there's no Gas Guzzler Tax. In fact, even the Z06 with the 7.0L V8 avoids the tax. The car just isn't that heavy.Money spent is money gone. If eliminating the V's will make the bottom line better (e.g., moving marketing dollars and production costs to a more marketable product) then they will do it, regardless of how much money has already been spent. GM currently has two high-dollar gas guzzlers (the Corvette and the CTS-V). They might decide having two is not a good thing.
The 'Vette really is a "gas guzzler"; GM reduces that impact with CAGS.The Vette is not a "gas guzzler" in the sense that there's no Gas Guzzler Tax. In fact, even the Z06 with the 7.0L V8 avoids the tax. The car just isn't that heavy.
What do you mean? They are from the government, they are here to help. They know whats best for us.The V isn't going anywhere, but if it does I'd say GM is in trouble (due to the fed trying to run things to much).
My Vette with 450hp averages 25.3 MPG, and gets 33 MPG highway. Hardly a gas guzzler. :thepan:The 'Vette really is a "gas guzzler"; GM reduces that impact with CAGS.