Cadillac Owners Forum banner
21 - 40 of 109 Posts

· Administrator
'05 CTS-V
Joined
·
9,365 Posts
I'm surprised a poly bushing in the front mounting location would work. Poly is typically used to provide more resistance to torsion than a rubber bushing provides. In that front bushing, you want the trailing arm to pivot up and down freely, so you need the bushing to allow that, but resist forward/aft motion under braking and acceleration. A spherical bearing (or one of the spherical bushings like those offered by Ballistic Fab and others) seems like the right answer IMO.

Can you re-load the pics? I'm getting the same error referred to previously.

Edit: The hollow bolt at the knuckle to allow for greasing through the bolt is a good detail.
 

· Registered
cts-v
Joined
·
2,761 Posts
I dont think that price is overly high for these parts, more so when you factor in the low sales volume of our after market parts its a wonder we dont get stuck paying the same price for parts as the c63 crowd. most one after market parts for a vehicle with only 8-10k production units have huge price mark ups on them.

they could make a version of these for a golf/jetta ( or any other vehicle with large production numbers who tend to mod) and sell 10k sets of these parts maybe even at this price.
 

· Registered
cts-v
Joined
·
2,761 Posts
I didnt know that rock auto sold custom aftermarket parts.

Factory trailing arm
http://www.jimellisaudiparts.com/products/Audi/RS4/Trailing-arm/5558578/8E0505311AF.html

Aftermarket
http://www.hotchkis.net/20052012-mustang-lower-trailing-arms.html
http://www.spohn.net/shop/2010-Chev...tiac-G8.html?gclid=COWLkdWdv7gCFWxyQgod5UoA2A


I wont even pull up parts for vehicles in our "class" from mb/bmw/audi when it comes to anything aftermarket...and those cars along with the links i posts have different models where a supplier could sell those parts to them because they also like performance equipment. We just have a ever shrinking number of vehicles and soon a third gen cts-v to make ours even further obsolete from a product design standpoint.

I all say is let the companies build good parts for us, keep from thrashing each other and allow customers who bought the parts to leave feedback to make better parts. D3 gets heat all the time for their costs, but i can say it their customers running all over cali seem to be happy and i dont recall anyone ever complaining about their parts not lasting.
 

· Registered
Black 2004 CTS-V
Joined
·
818 Posts
^^^about $300 is typical for some good high quality trailing arms. I think CS priced the 8.8 kits just right - a little more for the turnkey do it in one weekend, and the partial kit to bank a few $$$.

I'm glad you decided to give the community trailing arms, they look great! Want some money Max? Do a turnkey fuel system upgrade kit - dual pump hangar with all the lines etc.
 

· Registered
05 cts-v
Joined
·
22 Posts
Honestly I have been following this thread for about a year. From my observation, Fuzzy is a very condescending and opinionated person. He thinks he is never wrong and everything he does is the only way anything should be done. Its quite annoying. Plus hes got a huge hard on for revshift and trys to belittle their competitors any chance he gets.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,046 Posts
Honestly I have been following this thread for about a year. From my observation, Fuzzy is a very condescending and opinionated person. He thinks he is never wrong and everything he does is the only way anything should be done. Its quite annoying. Plus hes got a huge hard on for revshift and trys to belittle their competitors any chance he gets.
Oh? Remember how I raked them over the coals for months with questions about quality and pricing when they first produced CTS-V products? Obviously you don't. Instead of whining and complaining, Revshift proved that their products were well-engineered and worth the price. They earned the respect that they're given, but they could lose it if they made a couple of bad turns.

My only advice is that you do your homework next time before your opinions lead you to say something else that's obviously wrong. To wit:

I try my best to do sufficient research before I write anything up (recent examples: 1, 2, 3). The last thing that I want to do is provide inaccurate information that would result in wasted time or money. Engineering ethics. It has nothing to do with wanting to feel superior. It has everything to do with not wanting to be wrong or a burden. When I ask a question (recent examples: 1, 2), you'll note that I usually come to the table with research in hand because I hate being spoon-fed. The definition of "condescending" implies that I'm patronizing you. Do you feel patronized?
 

· Registered
05 cts-v
Joined
·
22 Posts
Well if you want to get into vocabulary lesons that's fine. At least make sure you are correct before trying to point out errors. There is more than one definition of patronize, one of them being to talk down and belittle. So to answer your question, no not me but I'm sure others would say yes.

patronize
verb
1. talk down to, look down on, treat as inferior, treat like a child, be lofty with, treat condescendingly

I said I have followed this forum for a year. How would I know what you did 3 years ago? I just gave my honest opinion of how I perceive you on this forum, I'm obviously not the only one that thinks this about you. You could be the world's nicest guy in person (though I highly doubt it) but on here you are the polar opposite.
 

· Registered
06 CTS-V Kooks 1 7/8, Corsa, KW Var 3, Hotchkis sways
Joined
·
183 Posts
If it bothers you so much, skip the banter and read the facts and information that is brought to the table. And much useful information has been brought time and again. Ive found it helpful.
 

· Registered
NONE!
Joined
·
356 Posts
Wow this thread got off track... Who cares if Fuzzy is a prick... He provides good info at times... And yea these parts can be considered pricey, but if they don't break and they look sexy then it's worth it to me...
 

· Registered
2005 CTS-V Maggied
Joined
·
271 Posts
I'm surprised a poly bushing in the front mounting location would work. Poly is typically used to provide more resistance to torsion than a rubber bushing provides. In that front bushing, you want the trailing arm to pivot up and down freely, so you need the bushing to allow that, but resist forward/aft motion under braking and acceleration. A spherical bearing (or one of the spherical bushings like those offered by Ballistic Fab and others) seems like the right answer IMO.

Can you re-load the pics? I'm getting the same error referred to previously.

Edit: The hollow bolt at the knuckle to allow for greasing through the bolt is a good detail.
I'm kind of leaning the same way with the front bushing. Ideally you don't want very much resistance for the up and down rotation this joint sees. You don't want it too soft either or else you'll end up with increased wheel hop and poor wheel stability. I'd be curious to see how easy it is to deflect a 70A poly bushing with the long moment arm of this trailing arm. I'm assuming it moves fine but I'm not sure how long the bushing will last from a durability perspective since poly isn't as soft and forgiving as rubber. Typically a bushing setup of this nature isn't meant to see more than 5° of side to side deflection.

Another thing to consider when replacing a rubber bushing with a poly bushing or cross-axis ball-joint is that it will definitely transmit more road noise into the cabin. For some this is a deal breaker, for others not an issue. Anybody that has a BMR trailing arm can comment on this as it should feel the same as what Max is offering, just have less wheel clearance.

Keeping in mind if enough of us want a cross-axis ball-joint in place of the poly bushing Max said in his original post he was willing to consider it based on interest. From a construction standpoint it shouldn't be too difficult to replace that captured bushing end on a jig with a self contained balljoint to weld on. Having a press fit balljoint insert put into the "pipe end" wouldn't be advisable due to the required material thickness needed to hold the balljoint in place. You'd want at least a 3/8" surround holding it in, preferably a cast iron link to maintain the "press fit".

I think I'd fall into the prefer a balljoint category. I'd already be degrading ride quality with a poly front bushing over stock setup and stepping up to a cross-axis ball-joint should be very similar in noise transmission to the poly bushing. I'd take the cross-axis balljoint for durability purposes at that point, only problem being that if they don't last very long, you'd have to replace the entire arm, versus replacing a removable bushing unless they were somehow rebuildable (ballistic fab weld on balljoints are rebuildable).

I think If Max offered this welded on to the front end
Product Auto part Flange Wheel Automotive wheel system


http://www.ballisticfabrication.com/263-Heavy-Duty-Ballistic-Joint_p_1226.html
it would be the perfect trailing arm.

Keep up the good work Creative Steel. We appreciate the never ending options that you are developing for this platform!
 
21 - 40 of 109 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top