[lollygagger8]

Straight coming off the supply at the rear of the engine, 90deg at the rail:

Looks good. I assume you aren't putting your FRC's back on, but does that new line make it easier to do so? Like, give it more clearance?

 

[AAIIIC]

The LS6 FRCs don't sit against the FAST intake right, so I haven't tried putting them on since I installed the fuel line. I'm not even sure where I've stuck them in the garage.

Maybe the fuel line would now come out of the previously-unused slot on the driver's side FRC?

If I find the FRCs I'll take a look and see how things line up now.

 

[Cadispeedster]

Recently upgraded my fittings to -10 but kept the hose size at -8, this way i am getting full flow of fuel through the rails...

Doing the same thing on my Maggie for my Tahoe with a 403ci...

With everything stock, are these -6's restricting fuel flow??



Also, I'm wondering if there's a 90 fitting for this if it will still work with the fuel rail covers... Looks great with a 90 but with my previous pictures, it looks like it may be too short.
Maybe this fitting...

Here's mine:

 

[Guest]

-6AN is 3/8" ID, same as the stock fuel line.

It looks like it might be close with a 90 deg fitting. It may take just a slight modification to the cover for it to fit perfectly.

 

[SatterlyV]

The LS6 FRCs don't sit against the FAST intake right, so I haven't tried putting them on since I installed the fuel line. I'm not even sure where I've stuck them in the garage.

Maybe the fuel line would now come out of the previously-unused slot on the driver's side FRC?

If I find the FRCs I'll take a look and see how things line up now.

You dont have those covers for sale do ya?

 

[AAIIIC]

You dont have those covers for sale do ya?

Nope. They went back on the car at some point in the 9+ years since I made that post.