Cadillac Owners Forum banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Banned
1996 Fleetwood Brougham
Joined
·
7,237 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
So-called camless technology may allow for engines that get as much as 35 percent greater fuel economy than a conventional gasoline engine while lowering engine emissions.


In a camless engine, the valves are opened and closed electronically. Unlike mechanical systems, which give fixed amounts of valve travel and timing, an electrohydraulic device can move valves independently to any lift position for any duration desired.

This gives an opportunity for engine systems to tailor the performance of each piston on every cycle, increasing fuel economy and engine torque while reducing emissions.

Beyond valve adjustment, camless technology could allow for ultralightweight valves because the need to absorb the force and action of rolling camshafts is eliminated.
 

·
Registered
Black the Darkside
Joined
·
22,415 Posts
HotRodSaint said:
So-called camless technology may allow for engines that get as much as 35 percent greater fuel economy than a conventional gasoline engine while lowering engine emissions.


In a camless engine, the valves are opened and closed electronically. Unlike mechanical systems, which give fixed amounts of valve travel and timing, an electrohydraulic device can move valves independently to any lift position for any duration desired.

This gives an opportunity for engine systems to tailor the performance of each piston on every cycle, increasing fuel economy and engine torque while reducing emissions.

Beyond valve adjustment, camless technology could allow for ultralightweight valves because the need to absorb the force and action of rolling camshafts is eliminated.
Very intersting HRS. A step beyond Caddy's VVT. Us shade tree mechanics are lost in the new technologies!
 

·
Banned
1996 Fleetwood Brougham
Joined
·
7,237 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
RobertCTS said:
Very intersting HRS. A step beyond Caddy's VVT. Us shade tree mechanics are lost in the new technologies!
But imagine the tuning possibilites, once a computer reprogram would be all you'd need to change the 'cam'!!
 

·
Registered
1996 Fleetwood
Joined
·
2,536 Posts
With no mechanical way to open and shut valves, I see more power being drawn here, a slew of electronic things to go wrong, and real issues with dead batteries/jump starting cars. But maybe I'm just a realist, err cynic. :p
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,483 Posts
Yeah, thats the main problem with camless engines from what I've read - the battery power needed for them. I think a normal car needs 12V, while a camless engine needs up to 48V in some cases:bighead:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
309 Posts
Hasn't F-1 been using this technology for about 8-10 years now?

Shadow, your energy usage concerns are valid, but I've heard that the auto makers have already decided to upgrade auto electrics to 36 volt systems & they should be appearing in the next 2-3 years.

After this system has been in use for a few years, I can see great things from it. I mean, can you imagine... a "cam change" is as difficult as plugging a laptop or PDA into the car.
 

·
Banned
1995 ETC, 75 Deville, Cad500 powered 73 Apollo, 94 Mark VIII
Joined
·
7,971 Posts
I don't see why it would be worthwhile in any racing unless fuel consumption is a big issue. You can open a valve far enough to hit a piston with a regular ass cam.

I can't wait until the ricers get ahold of this, "the ultimate VTEC."
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top