talking about DeVille vs. Brougham here.
So I have a '79 Sedan. My mother has had an '89 Brougham for about 8 years now, I learned how to drive on that. Her finace' has an '87 Brougham... both cars in kinda rough shape by now.
But every time I see an 80's Brougham, I can't help but....well..... wish I had one instead of the '79, don't get me wrong, the '79 is a hellova car.... but I dunno....
Firstly, the roof line, the 80's is much more squared off, I like that, then the other main factor is the quarter panels... on the '79 they are angled down too much, makes it look chopped off... the 80's look more in proportion.
Then the back end, I like the 80's trunk lid better, and the tail lights are bigger... though the tail lights of the '79 are nice too.
Then the front end.... this is what I like most about the '79, I like the lower grilles in the bumper, and the generation design.... but I just like the 80's better, with its bigger grille, and bumper that goes lower for the grille, along with the smaller header panel up top... all this adds to the effect that when you see a Brougham coming at you... fast or slow... it gives it a demanding but graceful look.
Not to mention the Brougham also had the very cool chrome rocker/lower edge stripes... now I know the '79 Fleetwood had those, but the DeVille did not (I would like them someday)
then the interior... kinda the same, but the '89 had much better wood pattern (which I changed) but the dash, radio and climate control was better... though over 10 years they both changed alot.
What I like most about the '79, and where it excels far ahead of the '89 is the enigne and while drivetrain. With the 425, it makes it a whole bunch faster and more powerful then the 307. The TH400 is far better then the 200R4, and the 8.5" 10-bolt rear is stronger then the 7.5" on the Brougham... though they never seem to be a problem. Lack of computer and alot of extra electronic stuff helps with me liking the '79 more as well.
Oh yeah, the Brougham also has the chrome going down the side of the hood and doors and to the rear window etc.... IMO all that makes the car look better.
I gotta say though, the '79 is nice because it has the classic Cadillac style, looks like the 80's Brougham, shares the same exact interrior, so you can easily swap and mix and match (as I have done) but has a worthy power plant, as well as lots of 70's styling, so it looks like the 80's Brougham, but isn't.... it is a different era which is cool.
So I was wondering, between the 2, which do y'all like better and why? anything you can say to make me love my '79 more?
The only reason I kep the '79 is because... well, I paid $300 for it... it has a nice story
Also I have big plans for with that involve a hot rod 500.... and it is in such nice shape, it is actually my most presentable car I own, by far.... plus, the joy I get of driving the thing.... and when I did use it as a daily driver... just to kinda prove the point that standing the test of time... here is my 26 year old GM car still kickin'.
So lets here it from all of you guys...
So I have a '79 Sedan. My mother has had an '89 Brougham for about 8 years now, I learned how to drive on that. Her finace' has an '87 Brougham... both cars in kinda rough shape by now.
But every time I see an 80's Brougham, I can't help but....well..... wish I had one instead of the '79, don't get me wrong, the '79 is a hellova car.... but I dunno....
Firstly, the roof line, the 80's is much more squared off, I like that, then the other main factor is the quarter panels... on the '79 they are angled down too much, makes it look chopped off... the 80's look more in proportion.
Then the back end, I like the 80's trunk lid better, and the tail lights are bigger... though the tail lights of the '79 are nice too.
Then the front end.... this is what I like most about the '79, I like the lower grilles in the bumper, and the generation design.... but I just like the 80's better, with its bigger grille, and bumper that goes lower for the grille, along with the smaller header panel up top... all this adds to the effect that when you see a Brougham coming at you... fast or slow... it gives it a demanding but graceful look.
Not to mention the Brougham also had the very cool chrome rocker/lower edge stripes... now I know the '79 Fleetwood had those, but the DeVille did not (I would like them someday)
then the interior... kinda the same, but the '89 had much better wood pattern (which I changed) but the dash, radio and climate control was better... though over 10 years they both changed alot.
What I like most about the '79, and where it excels far ahead of the '89 is the enigne and while drivetrain. With the 425, it makes it a whole bunch faster and more powerful then the 307. The TH400 is far better then the 200R4, and the 8.5" 10-bolt rear is stronger then the 7.5" on the Brougham... though they never seem to be a problem. Lack of computer and alot of extra electronic stuff helps with me liking the '79 more as well.
Oh yeah, the Brougham also has the chrome going down the side of the hood and doors and to the rear window etc.... IMO all that makes the car look better.
I gotta say though, the '79 is nice because it has the classic Cadillac style, looks like the 80's Brougham, shares the same exact interrior, so you can easily swap and mix and match (as I have done) but has a worthy power plant, as well as lots of 70's styling, so it looks like the 80's Brougham, but isn't.... it is a different era which is cool.
So I was wondering, between the 2, which do y'all like better and why? anything you can say to make me love my '79 more?
The only reason I kep the '79 is because... well, I paid $300 for it... it has a nice story
So lets here it from all of you guys...