Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: using resistor to fool computer

  1. #1
    stoveguyy is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 03 STS
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    mpls mn
    Posts
    2,527

    using resistor to fool computer

    96sts. put in resistor on 1 front shock. no more codes. is shock default to soft or firm or what now? will i notice a difference in ride on rough roads from left/right side of car? i don't see any difference. should i put a resistor on both sides to make struts react the same?


  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Submariner409's Avatar
    Submariner409 is offline If it won't run, chrome it
    Automobile(s): 2002.5 F55 STS - 67,500 miles, 2014 Explorer XLT FWD
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MD Eastern Shore, Kent Island
    Age
    77
    Posts
    56,836

    Re: using resistor to fool computer

    Your STS has active suspension control for the front struts and rear shocks. If you defeat one side you MUST do the other. Default is soft - there's no longer any valve restriction control so the fluid flow is wide open. The front end will now handle like an SLS, not an STS, and the struts will NOT "react": they're now passive.

  4. #3
    stoveguyy is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 03 STS
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    mpls mn
    Posts
    2,527

    Re: using resistor to fool computer

    yes, sub i know shock is passive. so 1 shock is soft and 3 are firm at speed? define firm after 125k miles/15yrs? new struts would be great but $2k is pretty steep for a slight improvement in handling. has anyone on this board ever changed all 4 struts with OEM stuff on a 95-97 vintage car?

  5. #4
    Submariner409's Avatar
    Submariner409 is offline If it won't run, chrome it
    Automobile(s): 2002.5 F55 STS - 67,500 miles, 2014 Explorer XLT FWD
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MD Eastern Shore, Kent Island
    Age
    77
    Posts
    56,836

    Re: using resistor to fool computer

    Quote Originally Posted by stoveguyy View Post
    yes, sub i know shock is passive. so 1 shock is soft and 3 are firm at speed?
    (1 strut/shock is passive and 3 are controlled at speed. Depending on road conditions the changes from soft to firm are constant and infinite.)


    define firm after 125k miles/15yrs? (That's anybody's guess)


    new struts would be great but $2k is pretty steep for a slight improvement in handling. has anyone on this board ever changed all 4 struts with OEM stuff on a 95-97 vintage car?
    (Unknown, but that is the ONLY way to retain the original handling control as designed.)

  6. #5
    cl8525 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 99 black on black STS
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    18

    Re: using resistor to fool computer

    What type of resisters were used. I need to do the same on a 99 sts. Can you post a pic of the resisters and how you installed them also a part #

  7. #6
    Submariner409's Avatar
    Submariner409 is offline If it won't run, chrome it
    Automobile(s): 2002.5 F55 STS - 67,500 miles, 2014 Explorer XLT FWD
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MD Eastern Shore, Kent Island
    Age
    77
    Posts
    56,836

    Re: using resistor to fool computer

    The resistors are 1/2 Watt carbon types - $1 a 5-pack at Radio Shack. Look for JimD's posts on the subject. You simply jumper the connector with a resistor. 4.5 KOhm, I think. Insulate and waterproof well.


Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum