Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Engine Replacement question

  1. #16
    orange57's Avatar
    orange57 is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 2005 STS Northstar RWD
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    35
    Posts
    511

    Re: Engine Replacement question

    Quote Originally Posted by carter527 View Post
    Redesign? for a RWD? im sorry but that was funny, all GM did was try to fix the head gasket problem, changes from FWD to RWD? turn the engine 90 degrees. no brainer. Im just saying that the V6 is not a bad engine and its funny how people that have a N* want to put it down when they hear a few people talk bad about the V6 but they have no first hand knowledge.
    Yep, turn it 90, add VVT, make more HP and TQ, repair a known head gasket issue, bump compression....yep, complete no brainer, nothing redesigned in that. Actually, you're probably right, the engine is probably the exact same thing as the FWD, and probably completely interchangeable. In fact, there probably wasn't any redesign in the 3.6 either between the LY7 and LLT engine either, they're probably the same.

    Now that i'm done being a dick, all I was trying to get at was that you probably hear a lot more about any issue with the 3.6 engines because they have been made in such mass quantities and used across GM's entire fleet. Wasn't bashing your (or anyone else's for that matter) V6 on here. Congrats on your 137K miles, may there be many more to go.


  2. #17
    jimmbo is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2008 sts, 1995 Brougham V4P
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    225

    Re: Engine Replacement question

    I remember looking at one of the chains used on the 3.6. Most chains on a mountain bike look more durable. Very poor design... the engineers and the managers who approved that design need a public Flogging

  3. #18
    1BadCadSTS's Avatar
    1BadCadSTS is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 05 STS4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Age
    30
    Posts
    4,224
    7 northstars have gone through my family 1 had hg issues.
    1 3.6 is in my family and the thing drinks oil worse than that n* with a bad hg blew coolant.

    The 3.6 non di is junk. The problems of them are documented and well known. Did gm ever issue a recall for Hgs? Nope. But you bet your ass there's a recall on the 3.6 timing chains.

  4. #19
    curtc's Avatar
    curtc is offline Cadillac Owners Master
    Automobile(s): 2006 STS V8 1SF RWD
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Oakdale, MN
    Age
    31
    Posts
    6,058
    Quote Originally Posted by 1BadCadSTS

    The 3.6 non di is junk. The problems of them are documented and well known. Did gm ever issue a recall for Hgs? Nope. But you bet your ass there's a recall on the 3.6 timing chains.
    There is no recall, just special coverage on 2007 LY7's for 10 years/120k...05\06 STS (04 CTS too) owners got nothing...

    Reminds me of the 05 catalytic converter coverage....Same cats in the 06's, just as big of an issue, yet no coverage...
    Last edited by curtc; 04-17-13 at 11:03 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum