An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
Like Tree6Likes
RWD 19xx-1984 DeVille and Fleetwood,
1985-1996 Fleetwood and Brougham Forum Discussion, An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman in Past Cadillac Vehicle Discussion; ...
  1. #1
    Lord Cadillac is offline Cadillac Maniac
    Automobile(s): Cadillac Escalade
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Royal Palm Beach, Florida
    Age
    43
    Posts
    13,617

    An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...cial-talisman/

    Here's an except from the article:

    So. The Fleetwood goes, but it barely stops, it doesn’t turn. It rides well enough, but the Grand Caravan I drove last week is better-isolated from impacts, even if a modern CTS isn’t quite as good as either. It isn’t a “good car” in any sense of the word, and in the years after its introduction, these old mid-Seventies Caddies slumped, rusted, and disintegrated their way from the suburbs to the ghettos to the roadsides and junkyards, delivering perhaps the final coffin nails to the brand’s embalming.


    Why, then, do I love it so much? Why do I love its styling, its sheer sweep of sheetmetal, its unapologetic stretch past the borders of parking spots, common decency, and personal accountability? Why would I buy one myself, in a heartbeat, if I had a place to put it? Think of the men who played music on the deck of the Titanic as it sank. They knew their world was ending, they knew they would not live through the night, but while one was alive, one would conduct one’s self with decorum and a touch of style. It’s too much to ask of this Talisman that it be a talisman. There’s nothing magical about it. Rather, there’s something majestic. A sad majesty, the band on the Titanic, the lion in winter, the great general in defeat, holding on to his sword for one last moment. Once upon a time, Americans built these cars. Not good cars. Not great cars. Only sad, and majestic, and, in the final analysis, wonderful.
    Have an iPhone? Than you can get involved right now. Click here to download Cars Connected.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Caddy75 is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): Cadillac
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    54

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    Yes, something special was lost forever after 1976. I blame the EPA and the Japanese and OPEC

  4. #3
    cadillac kevin's Avatar
    cadillac kevin is offline Cadillac Owners Master
    Automobile(s): chevy 350 powered 86 FWB, 00 safari h.t. 66 toro, 83 lesabre
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    5,847

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    IMO something was lost when cadillac went to fwd mini cars (at least when compared to a fwb) . The article really reminds me of my caddy- nothing about it is special in the least. its gargantuan, slow, cant turn well, (It can stop though) , has nothing really impressive in the styling or accessory dept., was outdated when new, and the quality of the finish materials (plastic wood and chrome) overall sucks but at the end of the day it is majestic. a buddy of mine came over today in his fancy beemer when I was working on mine. he looks it over, noting about how its scraped down the side, missing trim/ filler panels and interior pieces, and barely runs but at the end he says "It's a very nice car." when I asked him why it was a nice car, he replied "Its a prestigious car. It's classy. Its luxury. its a Cadillac." I think that sums up these cars pretty nicely.

  5. #4
    pompste is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1995 SEDAN DEVILLE-4.9 & 1978 SEDAN DEVILLE-425
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,366

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Cadillac View Post
    http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...cial-talisman/

    Here's an except from the article:

    So. The Fleetwood goes, but it barely stops, it doesn’t turn. It rides well enough, but the Grand Caravan I drove last week is better-isolated from impacts, even if a modern CTS isn’t quite as good as either. It isn’t a “good car” in any sense of the word, and in the years after its introduction, these old mid-Seventies Caddies slumped, rusted, and disintegrated their way from the suburbs to the ghettos to the roadsides and junkyards, delivering perhaps the final coffin nails to the brand’s embalming.


    Why, then, do I love it so much? Why do I love its styling, its sheer sweep of sheetmetal, its unapologetic stretch past the borders of parking spots, common decency, and personal accountability? Why would I buy one myself, in a heartbeat, if I had a place to put it? Think of the men who played music on the deck of the Titanic as it sank. They knew their world was ending, they knew they would not live through the night, but while one was alive, one would conduct one’s self with decorum and a touch of style. It’s too much to ask of this Talisman that it be a talisman. There’s nothing magical about it. Rather, there’s something majestic. A sad majesty, the band on the Titanic, the lion in winter, the great general in defeat, holding on to his sword for one last moment. Once upon a time, Americans built these cars. Not good cars. Not great cars. Only sad, and majestic, and, in the final analysis, wonderful.
    That`s a great article on the Talisman! Amazing how HUUUGE it was.

  6. #5
    pompste is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1995 SEDAN DEVILLE-4.9 & 1978 SEDAN DEVILLE-425
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,366

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    Quote Originally Posted by cadillac kevin View Post
    IMO something was lost when cadillac went to fwd mini cars (at least when compared to a fwb) . The article really reminds me of my caddy- nothing about it is special in the least. its gargantuan, slow, cant turn well, (It can stop though) , has nothing really impressive in the styling or accessory dept., was outdated when new, and the quality of the finish materials (plastic wood and chrome) overall sucks but at the end of the day it is majestic. a buddy of mine came over today in his fancy beemer when I was working on mine. he looks it over, noting about how its scraped down the side, missing trim/ filler panels and interior pieces, and barely runs but at the end he says "It's a very nice car." when I asked him why it was a nice car, he replied "Its a prestigious car. It's classy. Its luxury. its a Cadillac." I think that sums up these cars pretty nicely.
    Very well versed,Kevin! And thanks again for the A & C note horns that makes my '78 Deville sound like a real Cadillac!

  7. #6
    Bro-Ham's Avatar
    Bro-Ham is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1979 Cadillac Sedan deVille d'Elegance
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Age
    47
    Posts
    3,986

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    Ten years ago had a 76 Fleetwood Brougham and a 75 Electra 225 Sedan. I lived in a super groovy over the top space age early 1960's house in a classic old school country club neighborhood. I loved to have both cars in the parked inside the garage with the garage door open - - what a sight! Those two giant and imposing cars in that garage looked natural and right - all American!

    Unlike the author of the article, I don't feel guilty for driving big American cars. We should still have large comfortable cars available to us and we should also be utilizing our resources so it is inexpensive for us to drive whatever kinds of cars we want. When given the choice, and the economic climate is unencumbered by regulation and government stifling and controlling oil production, I know people will always choose large vehicles for safety, prestige, and comfort. I predict we will be great again, and big vehicles will follow.


  8. #7
    sven914's Avatar
    sven914 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1989 Brougham d'Elegance, 1985 Fleetwood Brougham *Coupe*
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,196

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    Quote Originally Posted by cadillac kevin View Post
    IMO something was lost when cadillac went to fwd mini cars (at least when compared to a fwb) . The article really reminds me of my caddy- nothing about it is special in the least. its gargantuan, slow, cant turn well, (It can stop though) , has nothing really impressive in the styling or accessory dept., was outdated when new, and the quality of the finish materials (plastic wood and chrome) overall sucks but at the end of the day it is majestic. a buddy of mine came over today in his fancy beemer when I was working on mine. he looks it over, noting about how its scraped down the side, missing trim/ filler panels and interior pieces, and barely runs but at the end he says "It's a very nice car." when I asked him why it was a nice car, he replied "Its a prestigious car. It's classy. Its luxury. its a Cadillac." I think that sums up these cars pretty nicely.
    My sentiments exactly...

    The 11th generation was a complete train-wreck, with failure after failure for 15 years. The last gens are no improvement, but have better reputation because nobody at Cadillac cared enough to make one with a North Star. But it was still a Cadillac; not a Cadillac trying to be a Chrysler or a European sports sedan, but a Cadillac trying to be a Cadillac. I have never acknowledged Cadillac, as a company or a car, after 1996.

  9. #8
    CBodyFan is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): NONE
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    188

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    The 1976 Cadillac was not a bad car at all. About the only thing I can agree with is the fake wood. In retrospect it is pretty bad but at the time it was real pizzazz. Replace the fake wood with real and I think the interior of the Talisman is a lot more luxurious than any car built today. The whole point of the Talisman was to be over the top in terms of comfort, plushness and isolation, and in that it excels admirably! The Fleetwood Brougham (they had dropped the 60 Special designation by then) was the roomiest, most luxurious, most prestigious owner-driven six-passenger car built, bar none. The Talisman in turn was not only more luxurious than the Brougham or D'Elegance but more akin to a "personal luxury sedan". Especially the 1974 with it's four place seating arrangement. Is the 1977 Fleetwood or even the FWD Limo as roomy. Perhaps when you compare SAE measurements but not if you compare them by the seat of your pants. Sit in the back of the 76 and the 77 and you can feel the extra room. The greater knee room afforded by the longer wheelbase. (Why do you think they dropped the foot-rests after 77...no room). The added hip room provided by the greater width and turn-under. The FWDs do not compete from a "real world" spaciousness comparison in any way, shape or form.

    Criticizing the car for fuel consumption isn’t fair because the car was designed before the embargo and saddled with emission controls that were too strict given the level of technology at the time.

    As for ride and handling, well that is subjective. Personally I think the ride is superb. Could the steering be more responsive, yes, I would say so, but it was pretty much the norm for it’s day. Is it a safe handling car, absolutely, unless you drive it in a way for which it was never intended. Drive a trash truck like a Corvette and you will probably run into trouble. Drive a Talisman responsibly and you will have no problems. Keep in mind that any car from the 70s probably handles a lot more sloppy now then it did new simply because all the bushings have dried out. Rebuild the suspension back to spec and you might be surprised. I was around back then and they weren’t that bad. Just remember to compare apples to apples and not apples to potatoes.

    A point in the Fleetwood’s favor: you can see all four corners unless you are very short.

    In short the Fleetwood Talisman was never meant to be practical, it is not an “appliance” like a Camry, it was meant to coddle and impress, and that it did very well.
    77CDV, 77CDV, MoistCabbage and 1 others like this.

  10. #9
    DouglasJRizzo is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 1975 hearse, 1976 hearse
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Franklin Lakes, NJ
    Age
    51
    Posts
    865

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    Everyone has their own take on these. To me, the mid 70s represented the high water mark for the brand. Big bold and beautiful.

  11. #10
    ColK's Avatar
    ColK is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 1979 Coupe DeVille
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Age
    54
    Posts
    35

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    But it was still a Cadillac; not a Cadillac trying to be a Chrysler or a European sports sedan, but a Cadillac trying to be a Cadillac.
    I hear you. It's why I still have such an affinity for the cars of the 60s and 70s because even when American cars became castrated in the mid-late 70s, you could still see them as the cars they were supposed to be. They all had personalities and characteristics that were tangible, where you could look at it and say look at the ----- that just drove by.

    My stepdaughter's husband just bought a 2006 DTS and he pulls in next to our '79 DeVille when they come over. It's a very nice car but it it just doesn't have those distinguishing features that used to make cars identifiable. Take away all the emblems, throw a set of $30 hubcaps on them, view them from the side and I can almost guarantee you'll only look at one and say "That's a Cadillac". The same could be said for the Lincolns and to a degree Chrysler's New Yorker or the Imperials, although they never could quite match the prestige of Cadillac or Lincoln.

    The author used the term majestic and at the time, that's what these cars were: American Royalty.

  12. #11
    steck's Avatar
    steck is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2001 DTS / 1973 fleetwood
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    281

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    didnt read the article , but the quote was interesting, and actually pretty 'bang on'. They arent 'great' cars (as i'm finding out), but i guess its unfair to compare them with a modern car...even if it is a mini van.

    but he's right, they are 'majestic', and certainly a 'sign of the times', a last Hurrah for GM, as they knew it was the end of an era.

  13. #12
    CBodyFan is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): NONE
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    188

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    The author of the article isn't an expert on Cadillacs in any way. His description of the first generation Seville was proof of that.

  14. #13
    sven914's Avatar
    sven914 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1989 Brougham d'Elegance, 1985 Fleetwood Brougham *Coupe*
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,196

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    I kinda like this excerpt, where the author compares the Talisman to an '84 Seventy-Five. It's a great commentary on the demise of Cadillac.

    Only eight years separate these two cars. In eight years, Cadillac changed its world. The Fleetwood dropped from 5400 pounds to 3400. An aluminum V-8 half as large as the ’76 engine provided virtually identical motivation, in numbers if not feel. Amazingly, the cars became larger inside, more spacious, easier to operate, easier to park, just plain better in most respects. Like an Apatosaurus poked in the hindquarters, GM was slow to react to the legitimate criticism of its big car but powerful in the magnitude of its response. Seventy-six to eighty-four. From dinosaur to mammal in the same time it takes Honda to build two different kinds of substantially similar Civics. And the mammal is just so much better at nearly everything.

    Everything, that is, that has nothing to do with the core values of Cadillac. The smaller car, even when it isn’t a “limo”, has odd, dwarfish proportions. The vastly more efficient passenger compartment looks like the proverbial ten pounds in the five-pound bag. The public had barely accepted the 1977 de Ville as a necessary reaction to desperate times. but the FWD ‘Lac was comical, not dignified. It looked like a joke, like a child’s drawing of a car. Cadillacs didn’t need to be excellent, but they needed to be prestigious, and this was anything but prestigious. Sales fell dramatically as GM scrambled behind the scenes to “upsize” the car again, to put a little hood and trunk on it, to stop it from looking like a clown car that still, by the way, cost much more than twice what a normal family sedan did. They never returned to the massive, impressive look of 1976. They couldn’t even make it back to 1977. The current DTS looks like what it is: a sad attempt to expand the “Antares” not-quite-Aurora-but-had-to-be-second-generation-Aurora-due-to-budget-cuts G-body into something vaguely Cadillac-esque. Next to a ’76, it looks like a sick joke at its own expense. The wood inside may have become real, but the car itself has become false, forgettable.

  15. #14
    HAZZARDJOHN's Avatar
    HAZZARDJOHN is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 1975 Coupe deVille d'Elegance, 05 Lesabre,91 Suburban 4x4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Medieval England Iowa
    Posts
    761

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    I want to see 14 MPG :-(

    11 Years and many trips under my belt I have never topped 11 and can almost set my clock at 10.

  16. #15
    cadillac kevin's Avatar
    cadillac kevin is offline Cadillac Owners Master
    Automobile(s): chevy 350 powered 86 FWB, 00 safari h.t. 66 toro, 83 lesabre
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    5,847

    Re: An interesting article on the 1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Talisman

    I'd like to see a 4100 that has 190hp (much less 380 ft/lbs of torque). and I'd like to see any 4100 in a fully loaded limo that can move the car around at a reasonable pace without straining itself to death.
    btw, a seville and a nova share almost nothing in common (except the seville rides on a modified and longer version of an x body chassis). they were totally different cars in every respect. one was a pedestrian mover (ala camry) the other was the fanciest car GM built that year. one was bland and boring- the other was a revolution in american car design (paved the way for a class of smaller "executive" class cars. )

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting