DOHC theory, any new information?

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Northstar Engines and System Technical Discussion Discussion, DOHC theory, any new information? in Cadillac Engine Discussion; I wanted to discuss some of the issues I seem to be having regarding camshaft specs for the Northstar 4.6, ...
  1. #1
    Pontiacivan is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): None
    Join Date
    Sep 2013

    DOHC theory, any new information?

    I wanted to discuss some of the issues I seem to be having regarding camshaft specs for the Northstar 4.6, specifically my 05

    design L37 engine. It seems that traditional

    cam selecting techniques don't apply, most notably duration and overlap. After reading

    I was surprised to note that the early L37 had "long" 266 degree intake cams and 26 ,low by traditional

    standards but apparently huge in the DOHC world. Comparing this to my 05 with 10.9 degrees of overlap

    and cams smaller than the original LD8 it appears as though the L37 got crazy efficient. Even the 00-03 cams have more duration and

    overlap, in fact the LD8 from those years has duration numbers close to the later L37 but with more overlap. Several things come

    to mind first of which is: What does the torque curve for the 04-05 L37 look like? There is a popular dyno

    graph for the early

    engines that makes the L37 look "soft" on the bottom end compared to the LD8, but I would bet that the torque curve for the 04-05

    L37 looks a lot better, though I cannot find a dyno graph for this year engine. Second, based on the cam specs given it appears

    that all the 00-05 cams are installed retarded but one would like to assume the factory placed the centerlines in the optimum

    positions after much dyno testing. I would hope. Third, getting back to overlap, this engine revs to 6400 RPM with only 10.9

    degrees of overlap. So much for exhaust initiated intake. This seems to be the norm with other DOHC engines regardless of make

    or displacement. And of course, duration is no where near what conventional cam theory suggests. I have searched the internet

    looking for someone to say "The rules for DOHC cam selection are different because..." The best I could find was David Vizards

    statement that DOHC engines tend to draw the intake charge through the combustion chamber meaning that normal amounts of overlap would be a bad

    thing, in my opinion. I sincerely want to run some performance cams ( I am going to use Comp Cams regrind service ) If regrinds

    are good enough for CHRFab, they are good enough for me. I am currently looking at the XE258BH-116 profile used on their F@#D

    4.6 4v cams, though lift will be slightly lower due to our 1.68 followers vs the F@#D's 1.8. This profile is computer friendly and has 26 degrees of overlap, no more than the early L37

    David Vizard has a chart for calculating correct

    LSA based on intake valve size and CID. Though I hate selecting cams based on LSA, converting the area for two Northstar intakes

    to a single larger intake results in a LSA of 116 which happens to be the LSA for this grind. The intake is at 114, or a traditional

    advanced setting, in this case 2 degrees. I/E advertised durations are 257/259 with lobe lift being ground

    to .250 for .420 valve lift. This profile makes good numbers in all the car mag "build ups" for the F@#D and

    with ported heads from CHRFab, I would like to believe the lowest of these at least is within the grasp of

    the Northstar. I realize a lot of the power will come from improved exhaust and even though the solutions

    are few and crappy, I have a workable plan that should increase the front to rear flow.I do not recall the

    Northstar intake ever being listed as a power limiting item. I have 32lb injectors and a modified PCM tuned

    currently. Wondering about anyone's input regarding this path. Thanks!

  2. Remove Advertisements

  3. #2
    98eldo32v's Avatar
    98eldo32v is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 98 eldo/KD54 w/N37,T96,QA1,D55,DS3,U1Z. U3R next
    Join Date
    Apr 2010

    Re: DOHC theory, any new information?

    The things that you are talking about, MOST will not dabble in because they aren't trying to extract as much as they possibly can from their motor while going that deep into it.

    Ironically, the things you are talking about I can appreciate but there is little to next to none for motorsport parts for this motor.

    While it has it's quirkiness to headgaskets at times, this motor in stock trim in my opinion is severly de-tuned.

    It gets the job done fairly decently in the massive bodies it has been placed into but yet, no tuning per se', no adjustable cam sprockets to dial in the motor as one sees fit. No decent exhaust systems that actually improve power versus exhaust note/sound.

    I have a 2.3 quad 4 "A" engine in my 93 grand am gt . At one time Olds Rocketparts offered indexed cam sprockets for this engine. You could tailor the timing from 4 degrees advanced to 4 degrees retarded. Allowing one to "tune" for what they liked. Try find those things now........

    I guess no one figured there would be some that would like to extract more power out of their stock set up.

    Yet, I feel the biggest issue with the motor and maybe I'm wrong is that cross over pipe that joins the front exhaust manifold to the rear section. It's a tad bit small but conisdering it was packaged for a fwd platform, what is one to do.

    When I finally start working on my eldo, I plan to disassemble the heads and clean up the bowls just under the valve seat and look at how much the exhaust port is possibly choked off.

    As for sucking more power out of the set up, I suppose I can try to get pcm tuned for my 98 but I'd have to see some real world proof that it's worth it.

    Till then I guess we sit and wonder how much potential the stock trim will really have.....


    If you haven't discovered these guys yet........

  4. Remove Advertisements
    Cadillac Forums

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

What Cadillac(s) do you own? (Or type NONE)

Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts