Westers vs Fastchip for '95
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Northstar Engines and System Technical Discussion Discussion, Westers vs Fastchip for '95 in Cadillac Engine Technical Discussion; Well there's a huge price difference Wester's being $295 and Fastchip being $159 (??) Think they actually make that much ...
  1. #1
    darien99's Avatar
    darien99 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): none
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hazel Park, MI
    Age
    30
    Posts
    145

    Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    Well there's a huge price difference Wester's being $295 and Fastchip being $159 (??)

    Think they actually make that much more power? I just got done reading that other 14 page thread on westers, and it seems messing with a/f ratio doesn't help all too much on these cars, so basically we're gaining from timing advance.

    Thoughts?

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    clarkz71's Avatar
    clarkz71 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1993 Mercedes 400E / 1995 Eldorado/ 2006 Yamaha R1 LE
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    I can't say if Westers chip makes more power. What I do know is that if it does, it must be more timing and the higher risk of engine damage. I also know that Westers alters the transmission control side of the chip. The chip is actually called a dual mem-cal. It has two proms/chips. One for engine control, one for transaxle control. Fastchips doesn't mess with the trans control, which I like as my trans shifts fine stock. I don't want "firmer" shifts. Especially since it does that already when you put the shifter in 2. I've had my Fastchip in for 2 months. It makes more power low end & midrange and the speed limiter is gone. $159 vs $395......

  4. #3
    clarkz71's Avatar
    clarkz71 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1993 Mercedes 400E / 1995 Eldorado/ 2006 Yamaha R1 LE
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    And the Westers chip is $395, not $295. Click on the link, it's the third one down.

    http://westersgarage.eidnet.org/GM.htm

  5. #4
    darien99's Avatar
    darien99 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): none
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hazel Park, MI
    Age
    30
    Posts
    145

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    Opps typo on my part.

    I wondered what they meant by dual memcal. Now I know. I agree, my trans shifts solid if you put it in manual 1 or 2. Squaks those 18" wheels/tires.

  6. #5
    TripleblackETC is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): '95 Eldorado black on black
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Western Massachusetts
    Age
    29
    Posts
    133

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    I highly recommend the fastchip too. The price is right, and while the power gain isn't anything all that noticeable, the speed limiter removal is freaking sweet.

  7. #6
    darien99's Avatar
    darien99 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): none
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hazel Park, MI
    Age
    30
    Posts
    145

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    Well I"m not too worried about the speed limiter, I haven't even found mine yet in the STS.

    I'd hope the power is noticable though, is it really not noticable?

  8. #7
    clarkz71's Avatar
    clarkz71 is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1993 Mercedes 400E / 1995 Eldorado/ 2006 Yamaha R1 LE
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Age
    50
    Posts
    1,272

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    As I said before, definitly more power at low end and midrange. The 12 to 15 hp they claim is accurate. I switched the chips back and forth to be sure. Also, 93-95 STS and ETC don't have the speed limiter.

  9. #8
    TripleblackETC is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): '95 Eldorado black on black
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Western Massachusetts
    Age
    29
    Posts
    133

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    Quote Originally Posted by clarkz71 View Post
    As I said before, definitly more power at low end and midrange. The 12 to 15 hp they claim is accurate. I switched the chips back and forth to be sure. Also, 93-95 STS and ETC don't have the speed limiter.
    Maybe I'm just so used to it now I don't notice the difference.

  10. #9
    Cadillacboy's Avatar
    Cadillacboy is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1996 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,156

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    In fact it should give 10% increase in HP .I remember when my 'lade was reprogrammed those guys told me like that .
    In Northstar perspective, I think, it can even hit 330 HP afterwards

  11. #10
    92nsx's Avatar
    92nsx is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 04 CTS-V , 07 EXT
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Clearwater, MN
    Age
    31
    Posts
    172

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    Where can i get the fastchip? Fastchip.com i am guessing. Any one know if one is made for for a 96 sts?

  12. #11
    jadcock's Avatar
    jadcock is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): White Diamond 2001 STS
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,320

    Re: Westers vs Fastchip for '95

    10% is rather optimistic, for a chip. You're not getting any more air into the engine, which is an air pump. All a chip can do is play with fuel and spark mapping. Cadillac wouldn't have left 10% on the table if it were safe. If a chip maker is getting 30 horses with just fuel and spark mapping, there's a huge compromise elsewhere. Hopefully it's not in durability.

    There are no chips for 96+ vehicles. They are OBD-II and the computers are much harder to reprogram. Check the thread re: Westers Hacking the Northstar or whatever it's called. They're trying to work on a way to re-tune an ODB-II Northstar.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting