Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: $.1 motor

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004

    $.1 motor

    I had 2 Cadillacs with the 4.1 motor a 1987 Deville and a 1987 Eldorado and I had to replace the Cams in both of them.after that was done I never had a problem with them again.I heard some time ago that GM knew they had a problem with the 4.1 and offered current owners an upgrade or replacement.

  2. Remove Advertisements

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003

    Arrow Re: $.1 motor

    HAHAHAHAAH fruedian slip?

    $.1 hahah

  4. #3
    ssstealth's Avatar
    ssstealth is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 06 STS-V, 94 Fleetwood TS
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Winston Salem, NC

    Re: $.1 motor

    I remember the 4.1 when it was first introduced. I was driving a 78 Coupe DeVille and did the one-time mistake of falling asleep on the interstate. After plowing through 160 feet of pine trees, the car needed to be replaced. I got an 80 model Eldorado and then decided that front wheel drive was not for me. I then got an 80 Coupe the following year and the 81 V864 the year after that.

    When 82 rolled around, I went down to Cadillac to make my annual trade. Then I drove the new "improved" HT4100 with the chrome valve covers.
    I can not even express how disappointed I was

    For the next 12 years I kept going back waiting for them to get it right. My 81 Fleetwood had 330,000 miles on it when I finally replaced it with my 94.

    I now have 292,000 miles on my 94 and I am still waiting for Cadillac to build a suitable replacement.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003

    Re: $.1 motor

    I would stay away from the 4.1L engine a.k.a. "HT4100 DEFI", the V4-6-8, and the troublesome diesel. These engines were concieved after the fuel crisis of the 1970's and the desire to make big cars more fuel efficient. They were all good ideas, but failed to live up to expectations in the real-world. They delivered trouble and caused Cadillac to lose come customers. There are still "survivors" out there and people who have been successful with these engines, but I still say they are far from Cadillac's best.


Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum