Is the 4.9 Under Rated? - Page 2

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 17 of 17
HT4100 4.1, 4.5, 4.9 Discussion, Is the 4.9 Under Rated? in Cadillac Engine Discussion; ok, so to compare what a "200hp" engine "feels like" we need a baseline. So our baseline will be a ...
  1. #16
    Night Wolf's Avatar
    Night Wolf is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): Unicycle
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Where I park it

    Re: Is the 4.9 Under Rated?

    ok, so to compare what a "200hp" engine "feels like" we need a baseline.

    So our baseline will be a current generation Impala LS with the Series II 3800 V6 producing 200hp and 240ft-lbs tq.? ok....

    So what times do one of those Impala's run?

    I know a stock 2001 Grand Prix GT runs a 16.4 or so... that is similar to the Impala, though a little more heavy.

    And, while my 15.9@85mph is true, that is honestly the fastest I ever seen a stock 4.9 Caddy do the 1/4 in, the rest seem to be around 16.3 or so... so do we use my speed, or the average?

    So lets say the Impala is the baseline 200hp, so the Caddy 4.9 "feels" more then 200hp.... what car "feels" less then 200hp and what are more examples that feel more etc...?

    I can't speak for anyone else, but I can't get in a car and say "this car feels like it has XXX horsepower" it is just a stupid statement, you can get in a 4cylinder Jeep Wrangler, put it in 4WD Low, floor it, and I bet it'll pull harder then a Northstar Caddy would, from a stop... until 30mph.... so what I am getting at is, so many factors come into play... my '79 DeVille is 180hp... I don't know how much it "feels" though, I know that if I was to get a 180hp Honda 4banger and put it in the Caddy, it would never move with that weight and the gearing...

    ah well....

  2. #17
    Ralph's Avatar
    Ralph is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): Cadillac
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Saskatchewan, Canada

    Re: Is the 4.9 Under Rated?

    I also think the late 1980's Firebirds were rated at 200 hp (1988?) with the 305 cu. in. (one year I thought they were)

    But like you said, too many factors..

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

What Cadillac(s) do you own? (Or type NONE)

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Your date of birth and age are displayed in several places on the forum. Only the administrator will have access to your date of birth should you choose to hide it via the privacy option below.


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting