Our '08 is our second gen-1 SRX, so we qualify as fans of the current configuration. We like it because of its "in-between" size: large enough to comfortably accommodate our family and cargo and to hold a 3rd row for the few times a year when our kids' friends are along for the ride but small enough to park easily and be maneuverable.
Both times (in '04 and '08), we chose the SRX over the RX because the SRX had more utility and better handling - the latter from its roots in a premium platform.
It sounds like Caddy has kept the handling edge but has now blurred its other advantages over the RX. And, when I first saw the reveal pics, I was not impressed. The more I read about it, the more I liked our gen-1 version over it.
I have to admit that this is changing and, on style alone, I am starting to warm to the gen-2 form. It may yet get on my list even over the CTS wagon (as our other vehicle is an '09 CTS, we'd like at least a little variety in the garage...).
As far as size goes, the gen-2 SRX is (compared with the gen-1):
- 4.6" shorter
- 2.6" wider
- about the same height (although the gen-1 is 2" taller, that includes the roof rack)
- about the same weight (in AWD V6 trim)
- less head room in the front (but same in the 2nd row)
- 10% less cargo capacity behind the 2nd row
- 5" less leg room in the 2nd row (and slightly less leg room up front) - this results from the wheelbase reduction from 116.4" to 110.5" and puts the SRX on par with the RX
- slightly less shoulder room in the front 2 rows - despite the additional exterior width of the vehicle
The biggest weakness I can see from these spec differences is that the car has maintained its weight, gained width and lost power, cargo capacity and rear leg room. Usually, those are not good things. Still, it certainly has style and will be competing in the showroom against the 2010 RX350, not the 2009 SRX. And, against the Lexus, this new SRX is sportier, heavier, slightly less fuel efficient, and significantly slower.
Gotta get that turbo V6 into the showrooms because this car definitely does not haul ass. All the mags are going to do their comparisons between the SRX and the RX based on this weak engine and the public's perceptions will be set. I'm afraid that Caddy is blowing yet another product launch. And, frankly, I think it's a mistake to offer the turbo with only the FE3 suspension - it should at least be available with the FE2.
Here are a couple of reviews:
Here's MT's take on a comparo with the Lexus:
Quote:
|
The '10 Cadillac SRX is refined enough to overlook its shortcomings and take over the Lexus RX 350 because it's the luxury crossover we'd prefer to look at and drive, every day. If Cadillac could close its refinement gap with Lexus, the new SRX crossover would be unbeatable in the marketplace.
|
Not a bad start - even with the underpowered engine.
This new SRX is INSANE!!! Get ready to trade your previous SRX's in folks! 
Re: 2010 Cadillac SRX Training/Debut *PICS/VIDEO* 
