Cadillac CTS-V Vs. STS-V

[shishcubob]

F acuras i completely pawn my buddies in my eldorado. And if i had to make the decision between a STS-V or a CTS-V i would definitely go with the CTS. Im pretty sure you can either get the '09 with an automatic or a manual tranny. Cause when they set the Nurburgring sedan lap record (or whatever the hell they did) the driver was using an automatic tranny i believe

[cts-me]

Originally Posted by shishcubob

F acuras i completely pawn my buddies in my eldorado. And if i had to make the decision between a STS-V or a CTS-V i would definitely go with the CTS. Im pretty sure you can either get the '09 with an automatic or a manual tranny. Cause when they set the Nurburgring sedan lap record (or whatever the hell they did) the driver was using an automatic tranny i believe

Ya , i know that they have both trannies, but they may discontinue the manual (due to low demand and problems with tremec supplying them.) for the 2010 model

[Rodya234]

the TL (2009) has an average 0-60 of 6.8 Seconds. it would stand no chance against ANY V-series.

[mbnv992]

Heck the regular V8 320HP Northstar would be faster then the TL.
Anyway, I'd go for the STS-V. No matter how much I would LOVE a CTS-V, I would never comfortably fit in one for extended periods of time. At 6'3", when I test drove a regular CTS, my knees were practically digging into the dash. Very uncomfortable. The STS is just hands down class IMO.

[V-Eight]

^ Damn.....really? I was hoping to get a used one sometime....maybe not?