Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz.
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Cadillac Reviews Discussion, Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz. in Item Specific Cadillac Discussion; Cadillac's personal luxury coupe is a little too "personal" for me. So as many of you know, I've always had ...
  1. #1
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz.

    Cadillac's personal luxury coupe is a little too "personal" for me.

    So as many of you know, I've always had a soft spot for the 79-85 Eldorados. Often I've called them some of the most beautifiul Cadillacs ever made. Well I test drove one today and found they don't quite live up to my expectations.

    Exterior Design: 9.5/10
    It's a great looking car...long..flat hood, short rear deck & the handsome, squared off lines. The 79-85 Eldo/Toro and Riv are one of GM's best designs in my opinion...they're very formal, but not overly stuffy or pretentious like other cars from that era. Sitting behind the wheel, it seems like it's a lot longer than it really is..that hood is MUCH longer than the hood on my '92, but I think the designers of the personal luxury coupes were going for the "cab rearward" design...push it all back as far as possible and still have it look good. When you look out the rear window, you can't see any of the trunklid and have to guess at where it ends.


    Interior Design: 7.5/10
    Looking at it, it's a beautifiul setup...loads of faux wood trim, pillow style leather seats and chrome. But in reality, it doesn't work as well for me. First of all, I'm not a big man by any means...I'm 5'6" and about 140 lbs. I thought the dashboard was way too close to me and the roof was awfully low, and I had the seat adjusted pretty far back and down. This is where the term "personal" luxury coupe comes into play...there isn't as much room as I'm used to in my deVille, which frankly is the same size as this car, length wise anyways. Otherwise though, the seats were ok, but seemed kinda shallow, atleast in comparison to the seats in that '84 Sedan deVille I drove last year. That tufted design seat looks better than it feels. Otherwise, it had the digital dash which I thought was neat, and all the digital accessories (MPG sentinel, ECC) still worked well, but were a lot harder to read than the ones in my '92, and that setup came out a year after this Eldorado was built..it's funny how much thing can change in such short time. The A/C was not blowing cold, so I turned that off, and I wasn't sure if the windows would go back up, so I didn't put them down, so I baked in that car. And a LOT of the power accessories didn't work (seats, mirrors, locks, windows, etc etc) which I guess is the norm for GM cars from this era that sat in the snowbelt.

    To sum it up, I like the interiors of the RWD deVilles/Broughams more because they offer more space.

    Driving Impressions:
    In the lighter Eldorados, the 4.1 makes decent power compared to the ~300 lb heavier deVille I drove last year. When I put it to the floor from a 15mph roll, it kicked down and moved pretty good, I don't remember the '84 Sedan deVille kicking down like that. I didn't wanna take the car out for a longer drive today due to the fact it needed some "work" so I didnt' get to see how the acceleration on the highway was. The 4.1 has a good powerband..you don't need much throttle to get it moving, but you've gotta go nearly WOT to get it to kick down. It's a pretty lean feeling V-8. It's got a great sound to it also, kinda like the 4.9, just not as raspy.
    But it's a 4.1, so buyer beware for coolant leaks and HG issues, and that's my main issue with this engine.

    The steering, like on that '84 deVille I drove, has a ropy feel to it, but offers pretty good road feel all things considered, and it was quite a bit looser than the steering in my car.

    The suspension was quite a bit floatier than the suspension in mine, but not as floaty as the RWD Caddys..this car moved down the road, just as quiet and easy as you'd want it to be.

    Overall: 65/100.

    I love the looks, but I want something with a more spacious interior and a more reliable and powerful V8. I think I'd like a 77-78 Biarritz a lot more. These Eldorados aren't on my "got to have it" list anymore, but that's just me. And as far as Eldorados go, I definetly like the Northstar ones the most now.

    Oh, when I say this car was a POS. I don't mean all of the Eldorados of this style, I mean't that particular car. It was in poor condition..the body had a bunch of dents in it, along wiht some rust, the AC was inop, the headliner was sagging, the bottom of the dashboard had fallen off on my legs and wouldn't go back into place. The car just seemed like it hadn't been taken care of.

    Pics (and a few videos):










    104,000 miles. Carmine Red with matching leather interior.

    [YOUTUBE]SrAlGmFfIYk[/YOUTUBE]

    [YOUTUBE]w-EdSSfR9ds[/YOUTUBE]


    And afterwords...

    [YOUTUBE]TbXw2BjpMmk[/YOUTUBE]
    [YOUTUBE]0ikDDuD0Bq0[/YOUTUBE]

    "They call Alabama the Crimson Tide, call me Deacon Blues."

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Lord Cadillac is offline Cadillac Maniac
    Automobile(s): Cadillac Escalade
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Royal Palm Beach, Florida
    Age
    42
    Posts
    13,570

    Re: Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz.

    Great review! I'm going to move this to the Cadillac Reviews forum if you don't mind...
    Please help us keep CadillacOwners.com online. Become a Site Supporter today. You'll get more than a "thank you" in return.



    In loving memory of Angelo Anthony Quagliaralillo... Rest in peace..

  4. #3
    Benzilla's Avatar
    Benzilla is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): '79 Phaeton, '90 Brougham, '79 CDV
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    4,287

    Re: Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz.

    Thanks for that review. I'd been wondering how those are to drive. I'm taller & bigger than you, so I guess I shouldn't think about one too much. What do you mean by 'ropy' steering?

    On a side note, how could you not test drive that C4!

    P.S. I love the 'bell sound' too, lol.

  5. #4
    Highway Star is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 1979 Coupe Deville
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    nc
    Posts
    383

    Re: Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz.

    I use to own an '84. It had the Touring Suspension option, which added some beefier components to the suspension. It was white with a dark blue simulated convertible top, Biarritz moldings and a special emblem on the hood that said "Eldorado Touring Suspension". I have a picture somewhere, maybe I'll post it if I can dig it out. It always ran well, and had adequate power, but as I recall there was some oil leaks. I'd much prefer the '79/'80 models with the better engine if I had it all to do over again.

  6. #5
    I~LUV~Caddys8792's Avatar
    I~LUV~Caddys8792 is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): '14 Honda Accord LX
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Roseville, MN.
    Age
    27
    Posts
    34,073

    Re: Video test drive review: 1984 Eldorado Biarritz.

    Quote Originally Posted by Benzilla View Post
    What do you mean by 'ropy' steering?

    On a side note, how could you not test drive that C4!
    By the steering, I meant the effort needed wasn't consistent throughout the turn of the wheel. For example, when it was centered, it needed almost zero effort to move it, but the farther you got into the turn, the more effort it seemed that it needed. It was really odd.

    Oh, and that C4 was a clutch otherwise I would have driven it. I don't feel confident enough in a manual to drive it for a longer distance, much less a 'vette.
    "They call Alabama the Crimson Tide, call me Deacon Blues."

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting