Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show

[Blackout]

Originally Posted by Katshot

Did you even LOOK at the dimensions you posted?
According to your own info:
Rear head room - STS is larger
Front leg room - STS is larger
Front and Rear shoulder room - STS is larger

Thanks for proving my point.

Katshot --> <-- The Tony Show

[The Tony Show]

Who's cherry picking stats now- 0.2 inch? Oooooooh, I got sooooo burned.

You bitched about the rear set room, which the Lucerne has a ton more of- it's a bigger car all the way around, but since you can't stand being wrong about anything you've switched from talking about rear leg room to front leg room to try and find something you're right about. Here you go:

http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/pdf/..._specs_MX5.pdf

A Mazda Miata has 43.1" of front leg room. Using your logic, the Miata is a bigger car than the STS. Oh noes!!!111!!

[The Tony Show]

Originally Posted by Blackout

Katshot --> <-- The Tony Show

Wait until you get home to hump your Daddy's leg.

Katshot------><-------Blackout

[Katshot]

Originally Posted by gothicaleigh

In what world is a Buick a competitor of Cadillac's?

If you think for a second that nobody cross-shops Cadillac and Buick, you're nuts. Hell, the old Ultra was arguably a better car than the Deville all the way around. Plus, you have to figure they are generally higher rated in quality. Look at your own post that showed that.

[Blackout]

Originally Posted by The Tony Show

Wait until you get home to hump your Daddy's leg.

Katshot------><-------Blackout

Dude, your seriously stretching now. The area of the car that he's talking about you just proved that he was right and you were wrong and now your grasping at anything now. It's ok to be wrong every once in awhile

[The Tony Show]

Originally Posted by Katshot

Also, in all four cars, I found that it was very hard getting my feet in and out of the rear seats due to lack of clearance and high sills.
Strangely, I noticed that I had none of these problems in the Buick Lucerne that was in the adjacent display area. I found it surprising that a Buick Lucerne had far more usable space in the passenger compartment than any of the Cadillacs and BMWs I looked at.

Originally Posted by The Tony Show

STS / Lucerne

Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 41.4 (+3.1)

Shoulder Room 57.4 / 57.0 (+2.6)

3 inches more both leg room and shoulder room in the Lucerne- it's a bigger car. The Lacrosse, on the other hand:

STS / Lacrosse

Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 37.6 (-0.7)

Rear Shoulder room 57.4 / 57.0 (-.04)

The Lacrosse would be a much better size comparison.

Really? Huh....

[Koooop]

Why not just compare the Hyundai Genesis vs. the STS both have 4 doors and an optional V8.

[JimmyH]

Katshot must have really big feet. Does that mean he has a really big thing too? He sure posts like he does.

[dkozloski]

Originally Posted by JimmyH

Katshot must have really big feet. Does that mean he has a really big thing too? He sure posts like he does.

How could anybody take seriously a car named after Safeway Store brand dairy products?

[Katshot]

Originally Posted by The Tony Show

Really? Huh....

Are you even looking at your own posts?
Do you realize that AGAIN, you're proving my point? Do you realize you posted the STS dimensions are the ones on the LEFT?
I'm not "cherry-picking" anything Tony. YOU said the Lucerne was bigger in ALL dimensions, I said it was only bigger is SOME.
Please read your own info and then look at what I said. You'll see that you are proving me right.