The Cadillac Forums Lounge / Member Introductions Only non-Cadillac discussion goes here. Cadillac discussions belong elsewhere. New members, please take a moment to introduce yourself. | Cadillac Forums: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show  | | 
03-24-08, 01:54 PM
| | Cadillac Owners Master | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Newtown, PA Age: 49
Posts: 6,509
Casino Cash: $1455
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by thebigjimsho Pretty simple explanation for that anomaly. | What? Because it's a few years older, it follows that it "should be" roomier and lighter per cubic foot of passenger cabin? | 
03-24-08, 07:01 PM
| | The Octagon Cadillac(s): Mine: 04 Blk Raven CTS-V... Hers: 07 Blue Chip SRX | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Seriously guys-guys, seriously
Posts: 8,781
Casino Cash: $2948
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show STS / Lucerne
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 41.4 (+3.1)
Shoulder Room 57.4 / 57.0 (+2.6)
3 inches more both leg room and shoulder room in the Lucerne- it's a bigger car. The Lacrosse, on the other hand: STS / Lacrosse
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 37.6 (-0.7)
Rear Shoulder room 57.4 / 57.0 (-.04)
The Lacrosse would be a much better size comparison.
__________________  | 
03-24-08, 09:27 PM
| | Things will be fine when I Rock the '09! Cadillac(s): '04 CTS-V | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: The Beast of the Northeast
Posts: 9,909
Casino Cash: $23867
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by Katshot What? Because it's a few years older, it follows that it "should be" roomier and lighter per cubic foot of passenger cabin? | No, because when you add a whole bunch of air bags, more bracing and added structure for the ever increasing safety requirements, electronics for stability and traction control, you name it, you add weight. Cars aren't heavier just for the sake of it...
__________________ The Caddy that zigs? 
So they were a generation late... | 
03-24-08, 09:38 PM
| | Cadillac Owners Enthusiast Cadillac(s): Cadillac 2004 CTS V Black Raven cause its faster | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Bardstown, Ky
Posts: 854
Casino Cash: $2805
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by Katshot You got that right! Strange, considering some of these cars these days are getting close to the weight of the old dinosaur (which everyone used to call a big pig). | I saw an article about weight and the Corvette was the only model that currently weighs less than its predecessor 3-4 decades ago. The cars dimensions are smaller but they attribute the fact that the dozens of computers, airbags, sensors, Nav units, 6 disc changers, seat motors, window motors, trunk hydraulics etc etc etc bring the weight WAY up.
I think the Caddy comparison was a current DTS (the monster I am currently driving while mine is still in the shop) and a classic 59 finned Cadi with all the chrome. | 
03-25-08, 09:13 AM
| | Cadillac Owners Master | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Newtown, PA Age: 49
Posts: 6,509
Casino Cash: $1455
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by thebigjimsho No, because when you add a whole bunch of air bags, more bracing and added structure for the ever increasing safety requirements, electronics for stability and traction control, you name it, you add weight. Cars aren't heavier just for the sake of it... | I don't agree that it's anything to do with "safety requirements" etc. The performance cars seem to be the heavy ones. Look at the weight difference between base models and the performance models. THAT's where you see the cars gain weight. I think it's all the beefed-up chassis and drivetrain components that are causing the bloat. | 
03-25-08, 09:17 AM
| | Cadillac Owners Master | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Newtown, PA Age: 49
Posts: 6,509
Casino Cash: $1455
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tony Show STS / Lucerne
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 41.4 (+3.1)
Shoulder Room 57.4 / 57.0 (+2.6)
3 inches more both leg room and shoulder room in the Lucerne- it's a bigger car. The Lacrosse, on the other hand: STS / Lacrosse
Rear Leg Room 38.3 / 37.6 (-0.7)
Rear Shoulder room 57.4 / 57.0 (-.04)
The Lacrosse would be a much better size comparison. | Try looking at ALL the dimensions, not just the couple that support your case. That's when you see that some cars are comparatively bigger in some dimension, yet smaller or basically the same in others. So you can't simply say that one car is larger or smaller than the other. You have to specify a certain point of reference to compare. And I think they do that on purpose so it's hard to draw direct comparisons with competitors. | 
03-25-08, 09:28 AM
| | Cadillac(s): Current: '94 STS Past: '93 Eldorado, '98 ETC, '03 CTS | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: MyWorldIsEvil, ButAmericanMade Age: 29
Posts: 4,418
Casino Cash: $2258
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show In what world is a Buick a competitor of Cadillac's?
__________________ | 
03-25-08, 09:40 AM
| | The Octagon Cadillac(s): Mine: 04 Blk Raven CTS-V... Hers: 07 Blue Chip SRX | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Seriously guys-guys, seriously
Posts: 8,781
Casino Cash: $2948
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show STS Dimensions Lucerne Dimensions
The Lucerne is bigger in every measurable category. I don't see why it's so hard to grasp why a car built on the DTS platform has more room than a car built on the CTS platform. | 
03-25-08, 09:55 AM
| | Cadillac Owners Connoisseur Cadillac(s): '95 FTS, '95 Taurus GL (DD) | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Bucks County, PA Age: 24
Posts: 3,685
Casino Cash: $3262
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by gothicaleigh In what world is a Buick a competitor of Cadillac's? | Nobody is saying that but maybe he is  | 
03-25-08, 10:01 AM
| | Cadillac Owners Master | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Newtown, PA Age: 49
Posts: 6,509
Casino Cash: $1455
| | | Re: Cadillac vs. BMW at The New York Car Show Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tony Show STS Dimensions Lucerne Dimensions
The Lucerne is bigger in every measurable category. I don't see why it's so hard to grasp why a car built on the DTS platform has more room than a car built on the CTS platform. | Did you even LOOK at the dimensions you posted?
According to your own info:
Rear head room - STS is larger
Front leg room - STS is larger
Front and Rear shoulder room - STS is larger
Thanks for proving my point. | | Cadillac Discussion Tools | | |
Cadillac Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off
Censor is ON | | | |
|