: just bought cherokee srt-8



1MEANV
01-09-07, 07:17 PM
just bought a cherokee srt-8. anyone in here have one and if so what do you think of yours

starfox86
01-09-07, 07:20 PM
if you dont mind me asking, whatd u pay?

wildwhl
01-09-07, 08:34 PM
why, did you suddenly have a brain fart? :Poke:

WW

mharker
01-09-07, 09:21 PM
Freakin' fast machine you got there! I do consulting work for Chrysler and see them all the time. Word is the GC is the fastest of the SRT8s. Not sure why.

Last month I was at the head office in Auburn Hills waiting at a light to turn into visitor parking. I heard this huge growl, looked up, and saw a GC SRT8 fly away from the stop light. Had a special plate. Must've been a Chrysler exec having some fun.

I was really startled on how fast this thing launched and how cool it sounded.
Maybe he was trying to race my LT1 Roadmaster haha! He woulda been surprised.

vmoving
01-09-07, 09:52 PM
My dad has one in Miami. Has 28k and no problems yet. I was down there and smoked a SRT8 300.

sj1400
01-10-07, 01:10 PM
A potent vehicle for sure - hard to beat AWD off the line.

vseries
01-10-07, 02:42 PM
I know they have some issues with tranny shifting which is within the PCM calibration(tsb's available for reflash) on the 05's and a friend of mine has an 06 which seems a bit better but hes not happy with that issue, Also they can break rears like the V's !!! so I dont feel so alone now lol, We had one come into work last saturday (I work for jeep/chrysler) with a broken rear pin causing a racket of noise back there, Not sure if its gonna go as abuse or failure yet. I've driven them before and never feal as if your getting the full potential from the motor throughout the rpm, I think if it was a 6 speed it would be another animal.

CVP33
01-10-07, 08:51 PM
The Jeep is in fact the quickest of the SRT-8's from 0-60. By 90mph the Charger and 300 catch up. Kind of hard to beat AWD, 425HP and 420FT/LBs of torque. I also like the Jeeps interior the best. I got to drive one at the SRT Track Experience and the handling will surprise you to be sure.

Make a note of the next Track Experience near you and attend. It's free of charge and you will have a blast beating the hell out of their cars vs. your's. :thumbsup:

RJ_W
01-21-07, 10:27 PM
I like them, but two things bother me. You have a pretty big suv but you can't tow anything. They cost $8000 more than the TrailBlazer SS that with $500 worth of tuning (apparently nobody is tuning the DCX pcm yet) and a $150 air intake is just as fast. They don't offer a 2wd version either. Still I like them, but if you don't need an suv to be an suv, why not buy a performance sedan?:confused:

gothicaleigh
01-22-07, 08:10 AM
I like them, but two things bother me. You have a pretty big suv but you can't tow anything. They cost $8000 more than the TrailBlazer SS that with $500 worth of tuning (apparently nobody is tuning the DCX pcm yet) and a $150 air intake is just as fast. They don't offer a 2wd version either. Still I like them, but if you don't need an suv to be an suv, why not buy a performance sedan?:confused:

:yeah:

A Jeep with no off-road capability should be viewed as blasphemy (although the number of un-jeep-like Jeeps seems to be growing; the Compass: :nono: ).

...my vote still goes to the Magnum SRT-8 for a go-fast hauler.

CVP33
01-22-07, 05:22 PM
:yeah:

...my vote still goes to the Magnum SRT-8 for a go-fast hauler.

You wouldn't say that if you drove the Jeep. The Magnum is the slowest of the bunch and feels it. Nothing launches like the Jeep, the acceleration is brutal and breath-taking.

The Trailblazer isn't even close in acceleration. 0-60mph is 5.7 seconds vs. the SRT-8's 4.6 seconds. Quarter mile it gets worse. The interior in the Trailblazer is a plastic hell. Think 1993 Z28 dash layout. The Jeep is the MUCH better vehicle and well worth the price difference.

To put it in perspective, I could buy the Trailblazer SS fully loaded for $25K. I'd still rather have the Jeep at $40K.

gothicaleigh
01-22-07, 07:52 PM
You wouldn't say that if you drove the Jeep. The Magnum is the slowest of the bunch and feels it. Nothing launches like the Jeep, the acceleration is brutal and breath-taking.

The Trailblazer isn't even close in acceleration. 0-60mph is 5.7 seconds vs. the SRT-8's 4.6 seconds. Quarter mile it gets worse. The interior in the Trailblazer is a plastic hell. Think 1993 Z28 dash layout. The Jeep is the MUCH better vehicle and well worth the price difference.

To put it in perspective, I could buy the Trailblazer SS fully loaded for $25K. I'd still rather have the Jeep at $40K.

The Trailblazer isn't even a consideration to me. But I'd still take the Magnum over the Cherokee. don't know why, but those wagons are just... :thumbsup:

RJ_W
01-22-07, 09:02 PM
I think the Jeep is a sweet truck, but like the Lightening you can't use it for a truck, I have a boat and other things I tow, so the Jeep wouldn't work for me. My good friend has a black TB SS awd. Stock with practice, it ran a 13.82 best run. With a $495 tune and $175 cold air intake in early November he went 12.99 and 13.01 back to back on a 75 degree day. He can still tow his boat. The reason the TB is slower is torque management overkill to protect the 4L60E. The 6 speed a/t is schedualed for this fall along with a boost to 410 h.p. It should be interesting since Jeep is rumbling about adding a few horses also. Ain't it great that we can buy this kind of vehicle at all? I remember the dark days of the late '70's and early '80's when 'performance cars' had 150 h.p.:cool2:

CVP33
01-23-07, 04:45 PM
I think the Jeep is a sweet truck, but like the Lightening you can't use it for a truck, I have a boat and other things I tow, so the Jeep wouldn't work for me. My good friend has a black TB SS awd. Stock with practice, it ran a 13.82 best run. With a $495 tune and $175 cold air intake in early November he went 12.99 and 13.01 back to back on a 75 degree day. He can still tow his boat. The reason the TB is slower is torque management overkill to protect the 4L60E. The 6 speed a/t is schedualed for this fall along with a boost to 410 h.p. It should be interesting since Jeep is rumbling about adding a few horses also. Ain't it great that we can buy this kind of vehicle at all? I remember the dark days of the late '70's and early '80's when 'performance cars' had 150 h.p.:cool2:

I agree, if you're towing the TB is the only choice. The performance numbers you posted are incredible. I've never heard, or seen TB dip into the 12's. I'm sure it can be done. The SRT-8's live in the 12's, consistently wet or dry with AWD.

RJ_W
01-23-07, 08:09 PM
I've never heard, or seen TB dip into the 12's.

There's a silver 2wd SS in Seaford ,DE That has long tube headers, cat back, tune and intake that runs 12.60's on drag radials. I only know of one SRT Jeep around here, he runs 13.10s, though I have no doubt that simple mods would put it in the 12's. I'm not knocking the Jeep, hell I drove them for years, my son still does at one time, my wife, daughter son and me all had Jeeps at the same time. I'm just saying don't be fooled into thinking the SS is not a contender, when the 6 speed a/t gets here and TM is toned down, you will see a very even match between the two.