: "If I Did It, Here's How It Happened."



HITMONEY
11-15-06, 04:10 AM
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Fox said Tuesday it will air a two-part interview with O.J. Simpson at month's end in which he describes the 1994 murders of his ex-wife and her friend that he says he didn't commit.

The interview will be conducted by editor and book publisher Judith Regan. On November 30, her Regan Books is publishing a book Simpson wrote with the working title "If I Did It, Here's How It Happened."

Fox said Simpson's book "hypothetically describes" how he would have committed the murders. The special will air at 9 p.m. November 27 and 29 on Fox.

Fox executives declined comment about the show Tuesday. In a statement released Tuesday, executive vice-president/alternative programming Mike Darnell said: "This is an interview that no one thought would ever happen. It's the definitive last chapter in the trial of the century."

Fox is a subsidiary of News Corp., which also owns Regan Books.
A spokeswoman for Regan Books didn't return a phone call or an e-mail seeking comment Tuesday.

Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman; he can't be tried again for those crimes. In 1997, a civil court found him responsible for the slayings and ordered him to pay $33.5 million to the victims' families.


http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&storyid=2006-11-15T040626Z_01_N14435424_RTRUKOC_0_US-SIMPSON.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

:annoyed:

gothicaleigh
11-15-06, 08:57 AM
:gothicaleigh:

EcSTSatic
11-15-06, 08:58 AM
Sounds like OJ has some guilt to deal with. The book should probably be titled, "If I had to do it over again".
I'm glad the parents had the guts (and the money) to make him pay in a civil trial.

Elvis
11-15-06, 09:05 AM
I have completely forgiven and forgotten about O.J.

That jury on the other hand...

RobertCTS
11-15-06, 09:13 AM
I burned out on that crap.:mad:

dp102288
11-15-06, 09:23 AM
Wow. Hypothetically, I speed all day doing 80 in a 50. Here is how I do it. WTF? I guess he knows he is safe. Not saying he did it, but I wouldn't.

90Brougham350
11-15-06, 09:40 AM
Still looking for his wife's killer on the golf courses of Florida, is he? Haha, Elvis, right on!

Patrick7997
11-15-06, 02:20 PM
Yeah, he's looked in every hole on the golf course, day after day...

That is crazy.... I saw this news clip, I thought it was a prank....

TagApl4
11-15-06, 02:26 PM
Long Live Double Jepordy, and statue of limitations. Just hilarious to me what u can get away with after u get away with something

Elvis
11-15-06, 02:40 PM
Long Live Double Jepordy, and statue of limitations. Just hilarious to me what u can get away with after u get away with something

I'm one of those people who disagrees with the civil suits against him. Sure, he's guilty as hell and all that, but IMO once you're found NOT GUILTY by a criminal court, that should be final. This "preponderance of the evidence" stuff is bullshit.

But I'm a little weird sometimes, so don't feel like we need to debate it or anything. I realize I'm probably one in 1,000,000 people who thinks this way.

Krashed989
11-15-06, 02:41 PM
This just in; That "If" was a last minute addition... Before the edit, it read, "I did it! Here's how!" ... LOL

HITMONEY
11-15-06, 02:43 PM
I am just shocked that the families of the victims didn't drop a chunk of change, which OJ supplied via the civil lawsuite, right back on him by means of random drive-by gang violence.

malcolm
11-15-06, 02:44 PM
I'm one of those people who disagrees with the civil suits against him. Sure, he's guilty as hell and all that, but IMO once you're found NOT GUILTY by a criminal court, that should be final. This "preponderance of the evidence" stuff is bullshit.

But I'm a little weird sometimes, so don't feel like we need to debate it or anything. I realize I'm probably one in 1,000,000 people who thinks this way.
You're not alone, that's my thinking as well. If he's guilty lock him up but once aquited, right or wrong, he's free.

TagApl4
11-15-06, 02:44 PM
I'm one of those people who disagrees with the civil suits against him. Sure, he's guilty as hell and all that, but IMO once you're found NOT GUILTY by a criminal court, that should be final. This "preponderance of the evidence" stuff is bullshit.

But I'm a little weird sometimes, so don't feel like we need to debate it or anything. I realize I'm probably one in 1,000,000 people who thinks this way.

No u are not, he feels that way also. He has paid next to nothing from that civil case verdict. Dont ask me how he gets away with not paying but he is good!

Elvis
11-15-06, 02:46 PM
I am just shocked that the families of the victims didn't drop a chunk of change, which OJ supplied via the civil lawsuite, right back on him by means of random drive-by gang violence.

I wouldn't have a problem with that.

But they won't do it because the only hope they have of collecting anything from him is if they make another "Naked Gun" movie. If O.J. is dead, he can't pay.