Mark W. Ingalls
11-15-05, 10:38 AM
Dear Reader--
Our 2005 CTS was involved in a rearend collision on Saturday. An unlicensed, uninsured driver slammed into our car as it was stopped at a traffic light. None of its occupants were even hurt, let alone injured, and we were able to get the car home. Pretty impressive engineering, I'd say. (I am an engineer by profession.)
On Monday, we brought the CTS to a local dealer, and the difficulties began immediately. They would give us a free insurance estimate of the cosmetic damage, but not the potential (and potentially dangerous) mechanical damage. In order to get the machanicals checked out, we had to drive to the service department and make an appointment.
So off we drove to the service department in our damaged CTS. The service advisor told us that he could have a mechanic look at the car, but that the actual work would be done back at the body shop, and his estimate wouldn't apply to their work. This all happened at the same Cadillac dealership!
My BS detector was going whoop! whoop! by this time. Instead of driving all over looking for the next closest Cadillac dealer, we drove home and placed a call to our insurance company. They counselled us on how best to proceed and where best to get service (a private, non-Cadillac facility).
While my wife was on the phone with the insurance company, I was logging a complaint with Cadillac. Surely they would be interested in knowing how we were left to fend for ourselves in the revolving door of that "Sevice" department!
The response I got from a "Customer Relationship Manager," so-called was that "Cadillac has little to no control over the process the dealership uses..." Whahuh?
Do I want a "relationship manager?"
Do I want an automobile -- ostensibly a complex luxury performance automobile -- the service protocol of which is not under the control of its manufacturer?
Am I interested in a legal description of "warranty" when my ten month old car suffers accident damage?
Why did I buy a new Cadillac in the first place, instead of a Chevy, if it was not in anticipation of the better service I expected (and for which I expected to pay) in the future?
What ever happened to all those Quality Assurance people who earnestly surveyed us in detail to determine our satisfaction immediately after purchasing the car?
Cadillac, I suggest it is time to take control of all aspects of the dealer - owner relationship, not just the purchase experience.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. Ingalls
Our 2005 CTS was involved in a rearend collision on Saturday. An unlicensed, uninsured driver slammed into our car as it was stopped at a traffic light. None of its occupants were even hurt, let alone injured, and we were able to get the car home. Pretty impressive engineering, I'd say. (I am an engineer by profession.)
On Monday, we brought the CTS to a local dealer, and the difficulties began immediately. They would give us a free insurance estimate of the cosmetic damage, but not the potential (and potentially dangerous) mechanical damage. In order to get the machanicals checked out, we had to drive to the service department and make an appointment.
So off we drove to the service department in our damaged CTS. The service advisor told us that he could have a mechanic look at the car, but that the actual work would be done back at the body shop, and his estimate wouldn't apply to their work. This all happened at the same Cadillac dealership!
My BS detector was going whoop! whoop! by this time. Instead of driving all over looking for the next closest Cadillac dealer, we drove home and placed a call to our insurance company. They counselled us on how best to proceed and where best to get service (a private, non-Cadillac facility).
While my wife was on the phone with the insurance company, I was logging a complaint with Cadillac. Surely they would be interested in knowing how we were left to fend for ourselves in the revolving door of that "Sevice" department!
The response I got from a "Customer Relationship Manager," so-called was that "Cadillac has little to no control over the process the dealership uses..." Whahuh?
Do I want a "relationship manager?"
Do I want an automobile -- ostensibly a complex luxury performance automobile -- the service protocol of which is not under the control of its manufacturer?
Am I interested in a legal description of "warranty" when my ten month old car suffers accident damage?
Why did I buy a new Cadillac in the first place, instead of a Chevy, if it was not in anticipation of the better service I expected (and for which I expected to pay) in the future?
What ever happened to all those Quality Assurance people who earnestly surveyed us in detail to determine our satisfaction immediately after purchasing the car?
Cadillac, I suggest it is time to take control of all aspects of the dealer - owner relationship, not just the purchase experience.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark W. Ingalls