: 89in-lb? Seriously?



eldorado1
09-05-05, 05:53 PM
For the intake manifold on a 96? I thought 35 in-lb might be too much for the plastic intake, let alone triple that! Just want to double check this is accurate. I just bought a cheap torque wrench that could read to 200in lb...

zonie77
09-05-05, 07:01 PM
That's in-lb, equal to about 7.5 ft-lb. What does the torque wrench measure?

eldorado1
09-05-05, 08:28 PM
I double checked to make sure the box wasn't lying, it is a in-lb torque wrench. I also checked so see how much force it is, and it's definately less than the 20ft# click on my 1/2" torque wrench, but still... It feels like a lot of torque for a plastic intake!

zonie77
09-06-05, 12:13 AM
That isn't that much force and it's good to use a torque wrench. I guess trust the torque wrench young jedi. :histeric:

lry99eldo
09-06-05, 10:20 AM
I think the division is by 16 rather than 12. 89/16= 5.5625. Equal to "snug" really.
lry99eldo

eldorado1
09-06-05, 10:22 AM
That isn't that much force and it's good to use a torque wrench. I guess trust the torque wrench young jedi. :histeric:

Yeah, you'd THINK it's not that much force... But I've removed the manifold several times, and NEVER have I tightened it down as much as the new wrench says I should have.

eldorado1
09-06-05, 10:24 AM
I think the division is by 16 rather than 12. 89/16= 5.5625. Equal to "snug" really.
lry99eldo

Since when are there 16 inches in a foot? http://cadillacforums.com/forums/images/smilies/coco.gif

I had it to "snug"... this is "tight". I guess I'm just going to have to trust the manual, and trust the torque wrench... but I'm deathly afraid.

mcowden
09-06-05, 10:32 AM
That isn't that much force and it's good to use a torque wrench. I guess trust the torque wrench young jedi. :histeric:

May the Schwartz be with you, eldorado1... Use the Schwartz!

zonie77
09-06-05, 10:43 AM
7.5 ft lbs should be a strong snug. It depends how your snugometer is calibrated.

lry99eldo
09-06-05, 11:17 AM
eldorado1, You're right. I was going from inch-ounces to inch-pounds, of which the conversion is 16. The conversion from inch-pounds to foot-pounds is 12 according to my conversion charts. Sorry. And my snug-ometer calibration is current until 12/2008. It's my brain-o-meter that's out of calibration.
lry99eldo:bonkers:

caddydaddy
09-06-05, 12:46 PM
Damn metric system! :)

mcowden
09-06-05, 02:33 PM
Damn metric system! :)

Is that why 2 $50 tires cost $150? No, wait, that's New Math, never mind... :bighead:

eldorado1
09-09-05, 03:15 PM
Well I torqued it in 3 increments, 35in-lb, 65in-lb, and then 89in-lb. For whatever reason, GM decided to put that stainless fuel rail in front of 2 of the bolts, so I had to remove that, and torque 6 of the bolts fully, then reinstall, and torque the remaining 4.

Well the two front (towards the TB) bolts didn't quite want to make the leap from 65in-lb to 89in-lb. They just kept spinning, and not really getting any tighter. Odd. I look closer to see what's going on, and the manifold beneath them is "mushrooming". The screws were crushing the manifold!

So at that point, I stopped and called it done. Obviously something is wrong. All of the other bolts torqued just fine to that level (and they looked fine), it was just those two that I had problems with. I wonder if there was some oil or something that got on the threads....

http://cadillacforums.com/forums/images/smilies/bomb.gif

I'm going to exchange my torque wrench just in case it's off... thoughts? There aren't supposed to be any washers between the bolts and the manifold, right?

eldorado1
09-09-05, 04:59 PM
Bah, there was oil on the threads... The overtorquing cracked the intake as well, although it appears as though it hasn't cracked through into the actual intake...

Next time I'll be careful to check the threads before torquing. But how did the oil get down there in the first place? Hmmmmmmmm.....

cguthrie
09-09-05, 05:08 PM
Hmmm,

Darn in-lb #'s! I was recently doing some work, following the directions which started with ft-lb's then upon recent review switched to in-lb's. Didn't notice it at the time.

Explains a sheared off bolt. Thanks for the education and FYI the Husky has the in-lb scale on the opposing side of the wrench!

I guess I can apologize to my torque-o-meter now for all my bad language.

CG
99STS 117K