ben72227
03-06-05, 04:18 PM
http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/archives/2005/03/a_cadillac_for_1.html (http://fastlane.gmblogs.com/archives/2005/03/a_cadillac_for_1.html#comments)
What I want to know is why WE can't have a small Cadillac this nice?
http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0502/14/A02-89127.htm
I mean, personally i like the CTS, but its big and somewhat unrefined, like a 0.9 version.... i want a compact luxary car, something that could compete with a BMW 3-series, something like this BLS thing
And when he says it was designed for "European tastes" it kinda upsets me because that usually means the american version will be crappier. I mean, doesn't GM realize that Americans buy small european sedans?
What I want to know is why WE can't have a small Cadillac this nice?
http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0502/14/A02-89127.htm
I mean, personally i like the CTS, but its big and somewhat unrefined, like a 0.9 version.... i want a compact luxary car, something that could compete with a BMW 3-series, something like this BLS thing
And when he says it was designed for "European tastes" it kinda upsets me because that usually means the american version will be crappier. I mean, doesn't GM realize that Americans buy small european sedans?