carguy16
12-28-04, 12:28 PM
Ok, If I read that correctly, there is NO DIFFERENCE what so ever in having disc brakes on the car besides:
A. Having better brake feel
B. Less nose dive
Now, would upgrading the rear drums and shoes to high performance, and performing the proportioning mod, with this help out at all?
Or, would I have better luck in:
1.) Upgrading the front calipers
2.) Pads
3.) Rotors
A new Game Plan:
1.) Have all my steel lines running from the front to the back of the car replaced, since they rotten, rusted, and spliced with couplings.
2.) Get new "High performance(Or "Fleet" type) Shoes and Drums.
3.) Turn my attention to the front, new calipers, slotted rotors and performance pads(NOT Z RATED :drinker ).
This will be so MUCH EASIER then hunting down new sensors, brake lines, cable, labor, etc...And cheaper too.
Would the proportioning mod be applicable for my "new game plan?" 10 percent off the front to the back really isnt that big a deal, 80 front and 20 rear really isnt that bad. Anyone?
http://impalassforum.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=35;t=000329;p=3#000 086
The overall test results -
1. The numbers for the straight disc conversion showed no statistical change to "efficiency", though there was remarkable absence of squat. The valving apparently sets the amount and timing of fluid going to the rear, and nothing in the combi valve was touched (just yet). And remember, I mentioned before here that rear discs with non-functional ABS makes the rears skid on wet without locking up the fronts. This is extremely NOT a desired condition, so I focused on getting the ABS back up operational ASAP. However, the change to all-disc did give a good firm consistant pedal all the way down with never a fade.
But, voila!, there is a marked increase in "Vehicle Efficiency" and "Front/Rear Balance" when the the rear disc conversion is coupled with the related stealth bolt installed.
The plate tester sets "theoretical ideal" F/R balance at 66.5%-33.5%. The baseline drum test showed 89.3%-10.7% F/R (only about 1/3 of the ideal if looking at the rear share). Again, the difference in F/R after just the disc change was not impressive, so I'm not mentioning it to reduce confusion.
However, the F/R share is 79.1%-20.9% after the stealth bolt was added. Now, 10.2% ADDITIONAL transfer from front to rear may not sound like a great deal, but it represents 100% increase over stock, going from 1/3 to almost 2/3 of ideal after the double mod.
A. Having better brake feel
B. Less nose dive
Now, would upgrading the rear drums and shoes to high performance, and performing the proportioning mod, with this help out at all?
Or, would I have better luck in:
1.) Upgrading the front calipers
2.) Pads
3.) Rotors
A new Game Plan:
1.) Have all my steel lines running from the front to the back of the car replaced, since they rotten, rusted, and spliced with couplings.
2.) Get new "High performance(Or "Fleet" type) Shoes and Drums.
3.) Turn my attention to the front, new calipers, slotted rotors and performance pads(NOT Z RATED :drinker ).
This will be so MUCH EASIER then hunting down new sensors, brake lines, cable, labor, etc...And cheaper too.
Would the proportioning mod be applicable for my "new game plan?" 10 percent off the front to the back really isnt that big a deal, 80 front and 20 rear really isnt that bad. Anyone?
http://impalassforum.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=35;t=000329;p=3#000 086
The overall test results -
1. The numbers for the straight disc conversion showed no statistical change to "efficiency", though there was remarkable absence of squat. The valving apparently sets the amount and timing of fluid going to the rear, and nothing in the combi valve was touched (just yet). And remember, I mentioned before here that rear discs with non-functional ABS makes the rears skid on wet without locking up the fronts. This is extremely NOT a desired condition, so I focused on getting the ABS back up operational ASAP. However, the change to all-disc did give a good firm consistant pedal all the way down with never a fade.
But, voila!, there is a marked increase in "Vehicle Efficiency" and "Front/Rear Balance" when the the rear disc conversion is coupled with the related stealth bolt installed.
The plate tester sets "theoretical ideal" F/R balance at 66.5%-33.5%. The baseline drum test showed 89.3%-10.7% F/R (only about 1/3 of the ideal if looking at the rear share). Again, the difference in F/R after just the disc change was not impressive, so I'm not mentioning it to reduce confusion.
However, the F/R share is 79.1%-20.9% after the stealth bolt was added. Now, 10.2% ADDITIONAL transfer from front to rear may not sound like a great deal, but it represents 100% increase over stock, going from 1/3 to almost 2/3 of ideal after the double mod.