: Panamera Turbo or Ferrari California



SuperBeast
05-28-11, 04:21 PM
i know that both of these cars are way different but i drove both today and fell in love with each...choices choices

jojipoji
05-28-11, 04:32 PM
Both are ugly as sin. But the performance and finish are awesome. I like the Ferrari myself

tabio42
05-28-11, 05:50 PM
The panamera would be my replacement for the V if I could afford it. Are you keeping your V?

Domsz06
05-28-11, 09:25 PM
i think the Panamera looks like a beached whale.

cbloveday
05-28-11, 09:40 PM
Ferrari hands down.

http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x99/cbloveday_bucket/ferrari_california_307_1600x1200.jpg


http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x99/cbloveday_bucket/porsche-panamera-wallpaper-01-700x560.jpg

hulksdaddy
05-28-11, 09:42 PM
While I would take either were they given to me, I don't like either enough to buy one.

LitiGATOR
05-28-11, 09:42 PM
Ferrari, easily.

mowershop
05-28-11, 10:02 PM
The panamera for the $ is the most ugly car I have ever seen!(I parked next to one and puked) now ferrari well that's quite a bite different.

haterinc
05-28-11, 10:11 PM
Porsche Pan looks awful... I've tried to like it and just can't. The Cal though is beautiful!!! Check the adv1 shoot... artwork

http://www.gtspirit.com/2011/03/26/ferrari-california-by-adv-1-wheels/

Trapspeed
05-28-11, 11:30 PM
Prancing stallion all the way.

TMC CL65
05-28-11, 11:40 PM
I can't get past the Panamera's rear end. It actually looks good from a dead-on straight ahead view. However, If it were my money, definitely the Ferrari California. The retractable hard-top roof is nice, it seats 4 (okay, 2 adults and 2 kids). I don't even want to think about the Panamera's depreciation after 3 or 4 years. Just look at a 4 year old Cayenne Turbo S. It was nearly $140K, and now you can get them for around $40K. A Ferrari is practically an investment compared to that.

Tom

thebigjimsho
05-29-11, 12:22 AM
I don't get it. The California has a huge, ugly ass. As does the Panamera. The Ferrari seats 2 and maybe a baby in the back. So why not get a 911 Turbo and get the good looks with better performance?

NiceRide
05-29-11, 05:04 AM
California, here I come. It should be illegal to compare or cross-shop the two. Btw, The Panamera is growing on me. I've always liked the California.

shchow
05-29-11, 09:24 AM
I assume you need the back seats because at the price point of the California, there are other 2 seaters I'd rather get.
But of the 2 you mentioned, get the Ferrari.

buddyg
05-29-11, 05:02 PM
The Calfornia is one of the ugliest Ferrari's. Give me a 430 or 458.

alq80
05-29-11, 06:03 PM
if you're spending that kinda dough, drive the 911 turbo... beats both IMO

thebigjimsho
05-30-11, 12:24 PM
I don't get it. The California has a huge, ugly ass. As does the Panamera. The Ferrari seats 2 and maybe a baby in the back. So why not get a 911 Turbo and get the good looks with better performance?


if you're spending that kinda dough, drive the 911 turbo... beats both IMO
Someone else with sooperior taste!