Notaguru
10-11-09, 01:49 PM
I'm a firm believer that performance is a safety feature, and in my six decades of driving have encountered many situations in which acceleration was more important than brakes.
On most of my past non-turbo cars equipped with an 02 sensor and ECU, I've installed nitrous. I keep it always-on, but put a tach sensor and speed sensor into the equation along with the TPS. That way, in an emergency I'm not fooling with switches: hammer all the way down, and (if rpm is up and speed is above 25mph) there's extra hp - a lot of it.
The buyer of my last nitrous-fitted car insisted on keeping the horsepower, so I don't have any parts. But I do have experience...
Perhaps it makes sense to add nitrous (a 75-100hp shot?) to this lovely 1990 Deville, with only 28k miles on it at this moment. Again, it's not to impress people but just to lie in wait and be available when required.
What do you think? Is there any valid ENGINE reason not to do it? How about the TRANNY? Has anyone done it, and with what results?
Thanks!
On most of my past non-turbo cars equipped with an 02 sensor and ECU, I've installed nitrous. I keep it always-on, but put a tach sensor and speed sensor into the equation along with the TPS. That way, in an emergency I'm not fooling with switches: hammer all the way down, and (if rpm is up and speed is above 25mph) there's extra hp - a lot of it.
The buyer of my last nitrous-fitted car insisted on keeping the horsepower, so I don't have any parts. But I do have experience...
Perhaps it makes sense to add nitrous (a 75-100hp shot?) to this lovely 1990 Deville, with only 28k miles on it at this moment. Again, it's not to impress people but just to lie in wait and be available when required.
What do you think? Is there any valid ENGINE reason not to do it? How about the TRANNY? Has anyone done it, and with what results?
Thanks!