: 2009 CTS-V from 0-300 kmh in 94 sec !!!



cts-v2009
09-15-09, 07:09 AM
Hi all

today i saw post in M5 board about Nardo hight speed test

the CTS-V did very very badly ... from 0-200 in 15.2 and from 0-300 in 94 sec

.. the cts-v was the slower of the group ....

http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=29328_nardo2009_122_517lo.jpg#

if this is true .. then all AMG cars , M cars , Rs6 is faster than the cts-v by big margin !!!
http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=29328_nardo2009_122_517lo.jpg#

Thanks alot

aceofblitz
09-15-09, 07:35 AM
YouTube - CTS V 2009, 0-300 km/h (0 to 100 in 4 secs!!!)

0-300 right here
if the youtube timer is correct then i'd say he did it in 36 seconds :D

Hawkeye2
09-15-09, 09:00 AM
another clip in the bottom does it in 32 seconds!

CIWS
09-15-09, 10:02 AM
I guess some people can drive better (or worse) than others. :shhh:

rjoffe
09-15-09, 10:02 AM
That data looks fishy
0-62 (100KPH) in 5 seconds? the V1 can do that :)

aceofblitz
09-15-09, 10:07 AM
Zi germans are biased???? YOU DONT SAY D:

cts-v2009
09-15-09, 11:10 AM
i think they did the test using v-box ... i tried this gps mchine and was giving me same result ( from 0-100 and from 0-200) ...

i think this v-box have problem with the caddi front class !!!

jasaero
09-15-09, 11:38 PM
If their car had a limiter like the video and they were using V-Box or something it might have just taken 94 seconds before it actually registered a REAL 300 as they bounced off the speed limiter for 50 seconds or something stupid.

nradcad
09-15-09, 11:59 PM
That's ridiculous. No one in their right mind would believe that.

nradcad
09-16-09, 12:03 AM
YouTube - CTS V 2009, 0-300 km/h (0 to 100 in 4 secs!!!) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VJTeNp4ueY)

0-300 right here
if the youtube timer is correct then i'd say he did it in 36 seconds :D

I don't even know what to say......about the music playing in the car.

UaeCTS-V
09-16-09, 04:21 AM
Lamborghini Murcilago 0-100km = 3.7sec ........ u gotta be kiddin me & the SLR 3.9 Sec lool am sure something is wrong with these statistics .. and there is no way the V2 will take more than 40 sec to reach to 300km..

RWFJR
09-16-09, 08:20 AM
This is crap. On to the next hopefully intelligent thread...

Mazz
09-16-09, 03:26 PM
you own a cts-v i presume , now ur worried about such statistic numbers ?
seriously take ur car for a spin and have a go with any of the cars mentioned and once they see ur rear lights from 0 till god knows how many kph or mph u tell me how good it feels? still not satisfied ? hmmm get some work done like vette doctors r showing us 800+ hp & tq then go back and repeat step 1 and tell me how good u feel in one hell of a car like the cts-v. if numbers r bugging u then u can do something about it. if not then u should be happy i presume.

i myself own a 2008 sts-v and know my cars limits , aside from street racing , driving on long highways with that kind of power im more than satisfied. good looks + enough power to keep me happy is exactly what i love about my sts-v.

sorry if my words were offending in any way but im just expressing my point of view and sorry if i understood the whole thing in a wrong way

Belated Ramadan Kareem to everyone out there and happy eid too

P.S
start saving people i hear rumors from the dealership about the cts coupe arriving soon

BeagleBrains
09-17-09, 09:46 PM
KPH is not observable on any highway signs in my neighborhood.
What is the point? Relevance? Opinion? Not a relavent point!:annoyed:
STS V is not a CTS V. Not the style; not the performance; overhead cam engine (production cancelled) is not a good old pushrod LSx high torque engine. Fastest Sedan on the Nurbergring Nordschleife ever! = CTS V.
CTS V Forum; that is the point. :D

nradcad
09-17-09, 11:20 PM
you own a cts-v i presume , now ur worried about such statistic numbers ?
seriously take ur car for a spin and have a go with any of the cars mentioned and once they see ur rear lights from 0 till god knows how many kph or mph u tell me how good it feels? still not satisfied ? hmmm get some work done like vette doctors r showing us 800+ hp & tq then go back and repeat step 1 and tell me how good u feel in one hell of a car like the cts-v. if numbers r bugging u then u can do something about it. if not then u should be happy i presume.

i myself own a 2008 sts-v and know my cars limits , aside from street racing , driving on long highways with that kind of power im more than satisfied. good looks + enough power to keep me happy is exactly what i love about my sts-v.

sorry if my words were offending in any way but im just expressing my point of view and sorry if i understood the whole thing in a wrong way

Belated Ramadan Kareem to everyone out there and happy eid too

P.S
start saving people i hear rumors from the dealership about the cts coupe arriving soon


I'm not sure that was even about.

aceofblitz
09-18-09, 02:31 AM
summary: Appreciate your car since you already own it, screw the numbers.

CTSV2
09-18-09, 03:22 PM
thats a bs time, i know for a fact that e55 amg is way slower on top end. Also, I will never trust m5 board.

Mazz
09-20-09, 04:48 PM
summary: Appreciate your car since you already own it, screw the numbers.


wow, now thats what i call a summary , thanx for the explanation aceofblitz