See link below. 72x miles, not showroom, but a solid 9 all the way around at worst. What are any disadvantages of having the rag top? They seem to collect dust very easily. Also, is it true that the 93 does NOT have the 350, yet gets worse gasmileage?:hmm:?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU94Rs6DguE

PS -

The guys wants 8 grand for it. What yall think?

Ooo Man that top is horny compared to the vinyl. IDK much on value of these 93-96's but dang its SHARP looking. Add some factory chrome wheels and your Cadillac Pimpin to the fullest

[QUOTE=blackbrougham1987;1395696] Also, is it true that the 93 does NOT have the 350, yet gets worse gasmileage?:hmm:?

\QUOTE]

It DOES have a 350. Just a different one than the 94-96. It has the RPO L05 - the "old" style small block with TBI fuel injection. Later B/D bodies got the RPO LT1 that has sequential port fuel injection. The LT1 makes more power, and also gets better mileage. Don't let this stop you from buying the car, however. I own cars with both engines, and they both have advantages.

If you like the car, and it is the right price for you, scoop it!

I think that looks bitchin'

I was thinking along the lines of a triple-black 93-on car until I happened on my Blue '91 and fell in love.

I think that's a really nice looking one and if that roof gets TLC I think it can stay looking sharp for a long time. Not sure how they compare to vinyl roofs in the long-term?

Martin.