Pics of new AMP RACK - Page 2
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 40
Cadillac Escalade, EXT and ESV Forum - 1999 - 2006 Discussion, Pics of new AMP RACK in Cadillac Escalade Forums; looking good! nice job man...
  1. #16
    ESCALADOR's Avatar
    ESCALADOR is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Manassas City, VA
    Posts
    246

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    looking good! nice job man

  2. #17
    93si's Avatar
    93si is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 05 Escalade EXT
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Winnipeg,Mb
    Age
    29
    Posts
    147

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    That is wicked Great job

  3. #18
    Lu Scola's Avatar
    Lu Scola is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): Cadillac Escalade EXT King of Mods
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    595
    Thread Starter

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    I doubt if I do any more mods this week. I was hoping to get the wall done this past weekend but never got around to it. I am picking up my winter wheels. I bought a set of 24" ASA by BBS wheels for the snow season. Im gonna sell the brand new 2008 Chrome factories I just bought 2 weeks ago. I want to keep my 26"s on as long as I can. I want to do the swap right before we start getting snow in my area. Im gonna clean my 26"s up real nice for the spring. I'll polish/wax the chrome, and clean the barrells to a new shine. When I put them on next spring it will feel like getting brand new rims again!

  4. #19
    Lu Scola's Avatar
    Lu Scola is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): Cadillac Escalade EXT King of Mods
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    595
    Thread Starter

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Thanks, I love this rack, cant wait until I get some new rack tops made!

  5. #20
    ItsAdam1's Avatar
    ItsAdam1 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Age
    31
    Posts
    111

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    hey nice rack.........

  6. #21
    1class is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2004 Escalade ESV
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gainesville, VA
    Posts
    99

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Very Nice! your shop does great work for sure!

  7. #22
    technobill is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2002 Escalade, 2005 EscaladeESV
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sylvania Township, Ohio
    Age
    53
    Posts
    26

    Thumbs up Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    YOU Sir, are no installer. You are an Artisan!

    Have you worked with any of David Navone's hardware?
    http://www.davidnavone.com/

    For what is now my wife's 2002 Escalade, bought new, my goal was stealth. My intention, and result was to keep the stock head unit, CD changer, and all stock speakers except those in the rear doors. With the exception of the rear doors, the stock speakers would serve as low volume fill for a traditional HiFi Stereo.

    The challenge was extracting the equivalent of line level outs for the amp that fed the Kappa Perfect Components in the rear doors, and similar low end outs for the woofers' amp, while establishing an optimal gain structure between the head unit, amps, etc.

    David's variable gain adaptors made it a piece of cake! I had looked around locally and the homegrown pros told me the back doors were a lousy place to the put the Perfects because it would destroy the "soundstage", of which they incidentally were incapable of providing a definition. O.K. Thanks for help your help Beavis. You might want to consider taking an acoustics course in the Physics department at our University.

    If you have customers who do NOT want to change out their head unit for security reasons, and are primarily interested in High Fidelity audio, David's adaptors and widgets are the next best thing to having Merlin on your staff! If functionality not present in the stock head unit is the customer's desire, then a new head unit is justified. But if the only concern is getting HiFi out of the head unit, it's in there! Plus there's something to be said for doing something elegantly, rather than just ripping out parts because its easier.

    The looks of that amp rack make me think you appreciate the rush of artistically accomplishing that which the rogues would have the great unwashed believe can not be done.

  8. #23
    Spittin Game is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): E
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denver
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,313

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Quote Originally Posted by technobill View Post
    For what is now my wife's 2002 Escalade, bought new, my goal was stealth. My intention, and result was to keep the stock head unit, CD changer, and all stock speakers except those in the rear doors. With the exception of the rear doors, the stock speakers would serve as low volume fill for a traditional HiFi Stereo.
    Wait, you left the stock speakers in except the ones in the rear doors? I was always told by pretty much everyone that if you are going to replace any speakers in your car, do the fronts, cause afterall that is where you sit when you drive. I dont understand why you replaced only the rear door speakers...?

  9. #24
    technobill is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2002 Escalade, 2005 EscaladeESV
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sylvania Township, Ohio
    Age
    53
    Posts
    26

    Arrow Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Quote Originally Posted by Spittin Game View Post
    Wait, you left the stock speakers in except the ones in the rear doors? I was always told by pretty much everyone that if you are going to replace any speakers in your car, do the fronts, cause afterall that is where you sit when you drive. I dont understand why you replaced only the rear door speakers...?
    Question is well founded and answer is based on social issues. Answer forthcoming. Stand by Expectorating Sport...

  10. #25
    technobill is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2002 Escalade, 2005 EscaladeESV
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sylvania Township, Ohio
    Age
    53
    Posts
    26

    Post Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Quote Originally Posted by Spittin Game View Post
    Wait, you left the stock speakers in except the ones in the rear doors? I was always told by pretty much everyone that if you are going to replace any speakers in your car, do the fronts, cause afterall that is where you sit when you drive. I dont understand why you replaced only the rear door speakers...?
    I fully understand your question, and your basis is dead on target. The answer is a function of the primary goal, stealth, while minimizing to the extent possible the deleterious effect of placing them other than in the front seating area. Serious listening is done in our home, courtesy of the accommodation of my addiction by my wonderful wife of twenty two years. Our living room is 24’ x 22’, 10’ ceilings, cathedral vaulting, and every piece of furniture, window covering, wall art, lamps, etc. are subordinate servants of the most sublime attribute of physics, the Lovely Lady Nymph Acoustic(s). Whoa… getting a little too into personal issues there!

    Incidentally, I was installing the Infinity Kappa Perfect 6.1s
    http://www.infinitysystems.com/car/p...=US&Region=USA
    which some install documents justifiably indicate are too large for the vehicle. For a “snap-in” install they were, but with very little door panel adjustments they fit beautifully and the 6.5” mid-drivers hid nicely behind the stock grilles.

    1)
    Acoustically the underdash side kick panel enclosures, to the left and right of driver's and passenger's feet respectively, are the best as they
    A)Keep the two components, the 6.5" mid-driver and 1" tweeter proximal to one another [the importance of this will be addressed later] and
    B)Allow a relatively unobstructed path for the highly directional high frequencies to the respective ears of opposite position occupants [right tweeter to right ear of driver] (left seat) and [left tweeter to left ear of passenger] (right seat)
    C)Allow a decent, although not optimal path to the respective ears of the respective position occupants [right tweeter to right ear of passenger] (right seat) and [left tweeter to left ear of driver] (left seat)
    D)Allow a relatively great, although not “sweet spot” equal, distance for both sets of speakers from both occupants.
    This position is hands down the winner acoustically, as supported by the IKP61 documentation.
    E)Infinity recommends the tweeters be mounted axially to the listener, but in my unscientific, double sided tape them in place, listen, modify, listen, modify, etc. the up and across angle provided by the kick panel cabinets sound better to me than an absolute 90° axial position. Thus the splitting of hairs in sub items 1B through 1D.
    http://manuals.harman.com/INF/CAR/Ow...206-1%20om.pdf

    2) While the kick panel enclosure position is moderately stealthy, the anal retentive StereoPhile in me couldn’t stand the thought of moderately expensive speakers proximal to wet, muddy, snowy, salty, footwear. Sure I could always take my shoes off in the back seat, crawl through the middle and be good to go, but I had this inexplicable notion that my wife might not be 100% consistent with this fully reasonable accommodation. Thus kick panels are out.

    3)Position Two in the IKP61 *.pdf is the position that in retrospect I probably should have gone with as I could have raised the position in the kick panel of the tweeter, and painted the casing/grille to match the interior. Unfortunately I had these annoying problems that precluded enough time to ponder options and come up with the idea of painting the tweeter grilles a matching color. Those problems were career, life, sleep, annoying shit like that. But as a result of visualizing the tweeters as black on beige “Hey, break in to this truck! I’m tiny but I’m connected to a whole bunch of cool stuff definitely worth a thief’s time” flashing anti-security beacons, I ruled that out. Big Mistake.

    4)Positions Three and Four in the IKP61 *.pdf are anti-stealth.

    5) Thus I moved my thoughts to the back (second) seat. As an I.T. Director, I knew a lot of fellow geeks from conferences and such, one of whom worked for Infinity and put me in voice contact with one of their design engineers. We covered all the foregoing, I can assuage my guilt a little by the fact that he didn’t think of painting the tweeter grilles for Position Two either, and we spent a good ninety minutes of our respective work days discussing the oxymoronic term “car stereo” and a lot of stuff regarding acoustics with which I was familiar and a lot of stuff regarding electrical engineering wherein my role was akin to “a cow staring at a passing train.” [From an Eagles song] As he was dragging me by my supraorbital notches through the details of multiple order acoustic alignments, he suggested an option that seemed utterly counter intuitive, but sounds astonishingly good. Place the left tweeter on the left rear door at ten o’clock to the left mid driver, no more than fore inches from the mid driver, directed straight at the left ear of the right front seat occupant. Place the right tweeter on the right rear door at two o’clock to the right mid driver, no more than fore inches from the mid driver, directed straight at the right ear of the left front seat occupant. To which I intelligently responded “No F__king Way?!” He then again hooked his fingers into the skull handles above my eyes and dragged me into tangential attributes of this Linquitz-Riley electronic trickery on, or seduction of, Lady Nymph Acoustia. I stopped him, asked if I could get a decent approximation by simply sticking the tweeters back there without the mid-drivers mounted in the doors. “Sure! The mids will sound like shit, but we’re not listening to them in this instance. We can dick with them via the filters’ configurations in your multi-amp structure. Don’t trust me, go try it.”

    6)
    I’m a network engineer, but that’s just a bullshit title for an enhanced geek. This chap’s undergrad work was in electrical engineering, Masters in EE and acoustics, PhD. in acoustics. This man was an engineer! And my own ears proved it to me as well as blowing my mind which was intransigently insisting that this simply was not possible. I don’t know if the same results would obtain with a different manufacturer’s crossovers, and the IKP61 component’s amp filters don’t take them down anywhere near the basement of the mid-driver’s range (I meld the woofers in in the true woofer range which is often mistakenly referred to as “sub” woofers), but strictly from my personal experience and perspective as a true High Fidelity Stereo addict the result sounds far better than it should! I would go so far as to say that in my opinion the sound stage, linearity of frequency response, and transparency of where the tweeters, mids, and woofers crossover, the setup sounds orders of magnitude better than my little pea brain thinks it should.

    7) But the main point I wanted to offer everyone is the ingenious widgetry of David Navone. There is a prevailing sentiment that one MUST replace the head unit if one is serious about upgrading the sound in their vehicle. In the 1970s this was true, trust me, but it is most definitely NOT TRUE today. The fidelity is in there. The tricky part is getting it out and getting it to the amplifiers when our stock head units don’t offer us the easy option of true line level outs. Hell, what am I saying? Not any kind of line level outs! The Delco-Bose head units, amps, squirrely combinations of speaker resistances, are befuddling at best. And an aftermarket head unit can be inconspicuous as seen by many of the postings here. But in the cases where an individual, or one’s customer has their own reasons for wanting to retain the stock head unit, fully viable, high end sound from that head unit is attainable. The telephone, voice output of the navigation system, can all be seamlessly retained. How many speakers, what type, and where, you wish to place them are up to you. The people like me who want to retain the stock head unit are no doubt a minority, a small percentage. But from my perspective, I don’t care what most of the market wants. I AM 100% OF THE MARKET. David Navone’s widgets, judiciously selected, allows me to have my cake, eat it too, and as regards the passenger having to take off her shoes in the back seat and climb through to the front; I get to have my pie and eat it too.

    8) But YES Expectorating Game my good man, the front row is BEST! In my previous post I was merely railing against the poseur experts who, out of ignorance, said not that what I was proposing was less than optimal, it is, but were saying that for the intents and purposes of HiFi Stereo COULD NOT BE DONE. I just happen to like people who are more interested in the best outcome, admitting ignorance and learning from others, not settling, and continuing to seek out solutions to complex problems about things that are personally important to them or their customers. This is at the core of being a professional. I REALLY like music. I REALLY NEED IT in as many environments, home, work, vehicle, travel, as possible. In different environments different priorities obtain. No I don’t suppose I can have a twenty four foot by twenty two foot, acoustically optimized, driving environment with a couple of mono block amps that double as space heaters (No they are not particularly efficient, but they’ll enliven or electrocute Frankenstein’s Monster at my whim and drive ribbon speakers with clarinet harmonics that will bring a tear to your eye, and a lump to your throat)

    9) Personally, I Love Being Wrong! Because when I am, I’ve learned something. And when it involves having had wonderful sound in the 2002 Escalade, before it went to my wife when I got my 2005 ESV, I am reminded of the great twentieth century philosopher Daymon Wayans who, before he hit the height of his popularity, oft said on “In Living Color” “Well put me in a dress, slap my ass, and call me Sally!”

    Should I have painted the tweeter grilles and put them in Position Two from the IKP61 *.pdf? Absolutely! Did I make a mistake? Oh Yeah! But my little pea brain was opened up to a much deeper world of what optimizing auto sound can really mean. With David’s ingenious hardware, my larger world, and greater humility (although said humility is probably not apparent in this post), I can still, finances and time permitting, add an amp, a pair of IKP61s in the front doors, and have far superior performance from the second row IKP61s resulting in a far superior final system.

    I would proof read this psychotically lengthy response, but I’m too busy imagining all the possible permutations for my 2005 ESV. Due to dramatic reduction/near elimination in drive time, as a function of career matters, I haven’t touched its audio system, am unlikely to be able to justify the E.J. Thomas Performing Arts Hall concert system I would configure, but my mind is racing nonetheless. People use the word “addiction” as if it’s a bad thing. I just don’t understand them.

    Now I'm up for some quality time with Alex, Neil, & Geddy.

    At Greater Length Than Originally Intended,
    TechnoBill The Obtuse

  11. #26
    Spittin Game is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): E
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denver
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,313

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Quote Originally Posted by technobill View Post
    I fully understand your question, and your basis is dead on target. The answer is a function of the primary goal, stealth, while minimizing to the extent possible the deleterious effect of placing them other than in the front seating area. Serious listening is done in our home, courtesy of the accommodation of my addiction by my wonderful wife of twenty two years. Our living room is 24’ x 22’, 10’ ceilings, cathedral vaulting, and every piece of furniture, window covering, wall art, lamps, etc. are subordinate servants of the most sublime attribute of physics, the Lovely Lady Nymph Acoustic(s). Whoa… getting a little too into personal issues there!

    Incidentally, I was installing the Infinity Kappa Perfect 6.1s
    http://www.infinitysystems.com/car/p...=US&Region=USA
    which some install documents justifiably indicate are too large for the vehicle. For a “snap-in” install they were, but with very little door panel adjustments they fit beautifully and the 6.5” mid-drivers hid nicely behind the stock grilles.

    1)
    Acoustically the underdash side kick panel enclosures, to the left and right of driver's and passenger's feet respectively, are the best as they
    A)Keep the two components, the 6.5" mid-driver and 1" tweeter proximal to one another [the importance of this will be addressed later] and
    B)Allow a relatively unobstructed path for the highly directional high frequencies to the respective ears of opposite position occupants [right tweeter to right ear of driver] (left seat) and [left tweeter to left ear of passenger] (right seat)
    C)Allow a decent, although not optimal path to the respective ears of the respective position occupants [right tweeter to right ear of passenger] (right seat) and [left tweeter to left ear of driver] (left seat)
    D)Allow a relatively great, although not “sweet spot” equal, distance for both sets of speakers from both occupants.
    This position is hands down the winner acoustically, as supported by the IKP61 documentation.
    E)Infinity recommends the tweeters be mounted axially to the listener, but in my unscientific, double sided tape them in place, listen, modify, listen, modify, etc. the up and across angle provided by the kick panel cabinets sound better to me than an absolute 90° axial position. Thus the splitting of hairs in sub items 1B through 1D.
    http://manuals.harman.com/INF/CAR/Ow...206-1%20om.pdf

    2) While the kick panel enclosure position is moderately stealthy, the anal retentive StereoPhile in me couldn’t stand the thought of moderately expensive speakers proximal to wet, muddy, snowy, salty, footwear. Sure I could always take my shoes off in the back seat, crawl through the middle and be good to go, but I had this inexplicable notion that my wife might not be 100% consistent with this fully reasonable accommodation. Thus kick panels are out.

    3)Position Two in the IKP61 *.pdf is the position that in retrospect I probably should have gone with as I could have raised the position in the kick panel of the tweeter, and painted the casing/grille to match the interior. Unfortunately I had these annoying problems that precluded enough time to ponder options and come up with the idea of painting the tweeter grilles a matching color. Those problems were career, life, sleep, annoying shit like that. But as a result of visualizing the tweeters as black on beige “Hey, break in to this truck! I’m tiny but I’m connected to a whole bunch of cool stuff definitely worth a thief’s time” flashing anti-security beacons, I ruled that out. Big Mistake.

    4)Positions Three and Four in the IKP61 *.pdf are anti-stealth.

    5) Thus I moved my thoughts to the back (second) seat. As an I.T. Director, I knew a lot of fellow geeks from conferences and such, one of whom worked for Infinity and put me in voice contact with one of their design engineers. We covered all the foregoing, I can assuage my guilt a little by the fact that he didn’t think of painting the tweeter grilles for Position Two either, and we spent a good ninety minutes of our respective work days discussing the oxymoronic term “car stereo” and a lot of stuff regarding acoustics with which I was familiar and a lot of stuff regarding electrical engineering wherein my role was akin to “a cow staring at a passing train.” [From an Eagles song] As he was dragging me by my supraorbital notches through the details of multiple order acoustic alignments, he suggested an option that seemed utterly counter intuitive, but sounds astonishingly good. Place the left tweeter on the left rear door at ten o’clock to the left mid driver, no more than fore inches from the mid driver, directed straight at the left ear of the right front seat occupant. Place the right tweeter on the right rear door at two o’clock to the right mid driver, no more than fore inches from the mid driver, directed straight at the right ear of the left front seat occupant. To which I intelligently responded “No F__king Way?!” He then again hooked his fingers into the skull handles above my eyes and dragged me into tangential attributes of this Linquitz-Riley electronic trickery on, or seduction of, Lady Nymph Acoustia. I stopped him, asked if I could get a decent approximation by simply sticking the tweeters back there without the mid-drivers mounted in the doors. “Sure! The mids will sound like shit, but we’re not listening to them in this instance. We can dick with them via the filters’ configurations in your multi-amp structure. Don’t trust me, go try it.”

    6)
    I’m a network engineer, but that’s just a bullshit title for an enhanced geek. This chap’s undergrad work was in electrical engineering, Masters in EE and acoustics, PhD. in acoustics. This man was an engineer! And my own ears proved it to me as well as blowing my mind which was intransigently insisting that this simply was not possible. I don’t know if the same results would obtain with a different manufacturer’s crossovers, and the IKP61 component’s amp filters don’t take them down anywhere near the basement of the mid-driver’s range (I meld the woofers in in the true woofer range which is often mistakenly referred to as “sub” woofers), but strictly from my personal experience and perspective as a true High Fidelity Stereo addict the result sounds far better than it should! I would go so far as to say that in my opinion the sound stage, linearity of frequency response, and transparency of where the tweeters, mids, and woofers crossover, the setup sounds orders of magnitude better than my little pea brain thinks it should.

    7) But the main point I wanted to offer everyone is the ingenious widgetry of David Navone. There is a prevailing sentiment that one MUST replace the head unit if one is serious about upgrading the sound in their vehicle. In the 1970s this was true, trust me, but it is most definitely NOT TRUE today. The fidelity is in there. The tricky part is getting it out and getting it to the amplifiers when our stock head units don’t offer us the easy option of true line level outs. Hell, what am I saying? Not any kind of line level outs! The Delco-Bose head units, amps, squirrely combinations of speaker resistances, are befuddling at best. And an aftermarket head unit can be inconspicuous as seen by many of the postings here. But in the cases where an individual, or one’s customer has their own reasons for wanting to retain the stock head unit, fully viable, high end sound from that head unit is attainable. The telephone, voice output of the navigation system, can all be seamlessly retained. How many speakers, what type, and where, you wish to place them are up to you. The people like me who want to retain the stock head unit are no doubt a minority, a small percentage. But from my perspective, I don’t care what most of the market wants. I AM 100% OF THE MARKET. David Navone’s widgets, judiciously selected, allows me to have my cake, eat it too, and as regards the passenger having to take off her shoes in the back seat and climb through to the front; I get to have my pie and eat it too.

    8) But YES Expectorating Game my good man, the front row is BEST! In my previous post I was merely railing against the poseur experts who, out of ignorance, said not that what I was proposing was less than optimal, it is, but were saying that for the intents and purposes of HiFi Stereo COULD NOT BE DONE. I just happen to like people who are more interested in the best outcome, admitting ignorance and learning from others, not settling, and continuing to seek out solutions to complex problems about things that are personally important to them or their customers. This is at the core of being a professional. I REALLY like music. I REALLY NEED IT in as many environments, home, work, vehicle, travel, as possible. In different environments different priorities obtain. No I don’t suppose I can have a twenty four foot by twenty two foot, acoustically optimized, driving environment with a couple of mono block amps that double as space heaters (No they are not particularly efficient, but they’ll enliven or electrocute Frankenstein’s Monster at my whim and drive ribbon speakers with clarinet harmonics that will bring a tear to your eye, and a lump to your throat)

    9) Personally, I Love Being Wrong! Because when I am, I’ve learned something. And when it involves having had wonderful sound in the 2002 Escalade, before it went to my wife when I got my 2005 ESV, I am reminded of the great twentieth century philosopher Daymon Wayans who, before he hit the height of his popularity, oft said on “In Living Color” “Well put me in a dress, slap my ass, and call me Sally!”

    Should I have painted the tweeter grilles and put them in Position Two from the IKP61 *.pdf? Absolutely! Did I make a mistake? Oh Yeah! But my little pea brain was opened up to a much deeper world of what optimizing auto sound can really mean. With David’s ingenious hardware, my larger world, and greater humility (although said humility is probably not apparent in this post), I can still, finances and time permitting, add an amp, a pair of IKP61s in the front doors, and have far superior performance from the second row IKP61s resulting in a far superior final system.

    I would proof read this psychotically lengthy response, but I’m too busy imagining all the possible permutations for my 2005 ESV. Due to dramatic reduction/near elimination in drive time, as a function of career matters, I haven’t touched its audio system, am unlikely to be able to justify the E.J. Thomas Performing Arts Hall concert system I would configure, but my mind is racing nonetheless. People use the word “addiction” as if it’s a bad thing. I just don’t understand them.

    Now I'm up for some quality time with Alex, Neil, & Geddy.

    At Greater Length Than Originally Intended,
    TechnoBill The Obtuse
    Tech, DUDE, you TOTALLY lost me man...

  12. #27
    Lu Scola's Avatar
    Lu Scola is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): Cadillac Escalade EXT King of Mods
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    595
    Thread Starter

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Its nice to see my thread turn into a online Physics course. I have installed componant speakers all the way around in my vehicle. I am very pleased with the sound, volume levels, and the crisp clean highs, tight lows, and great mids my truck has as of now. I never really took into account, what your saying above. I dont enter my truck into any sound competitions. Therefore I will trust that Cadillac has placed their speaker pods into good places to produce quality sound via the speakers. I still dont see why only replacing the rear speakers is better. A good set of componant speakers in the front door will sound much better than the factory ones anyday, so why not replace them as well if you do replace the rear speakers?

  13. #28
    technobill is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2002 Escalade, 2005 EscaladeESV
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sylvania Township, Ohio
    Age
    53
    Posts
    26

    Red face Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Quote Originally Posted by Lu Scola View Post
    I never really took into account, what your saying above. I dont enter my truck into any sound competitions.
    I don't either, I was just interested in the best sound given the higher priority of stealth.

    Therefore I will trust that Cadillac has placed their speaker pods into good places to produce quality sound via the speakers.

    That brings up one of the things I intended to mention, but forgot. If you observe Postition Four in the IKP61 *.pdf, you will notice it is not particularly different than the location of the stock driver and tweeter with the exception that the stock tweeter bounces its output off the windshield. But Infinity lists Position Four as the WORST of the four options. Here's why. If we are talking about aftermarket component speakers in Position Four, the sound from the tweeter will reach our ears significantly earlier than the sound from the mid drivers. Remember, our ears are hooked up to some pretty damn sophisticated software, and the software/wetware/brain would interpret this temporal variance of the arrival times of the sounds as being "smeary or muddy" for lack of a better term. Bose gets around this by all the advanced "behind the Wizard of Oz's curtain" processing that makes dealing with these systems such a pain in the ass. The Bose drivers and tweeters sound good in those positions because the sounds coming from them are ALREADY OUT OF TEMPORAL PHASE BUT PRECISELY SO THAT WHEN THE RESPECTIVE SOUNDS REACH OUR EARS THEY ARE IN TEMPORAL PHASE thus they sound clear, not "smeary."

    The IKP61s, and presumably all manufacturer's component systems, are designed to have the tweeters and mid-drivers proximal to one another to avoid the undesireable effect of having their outputs reach the occupants' ears out of temporal phase. Unless they specifically state they can be adjusted based on how far apart they are [REAL unlikely I'm thinking], it's not an unreasonable assumption because the things that affect propagation of sound waves in gases are pretty much 'standard equipment' here on our planet. "Fun With Sound: Inhale helium, frequency shift your voice, get your friends to inhale too much helium and asphyxiate. They'll talk funny then pass out from lack of oxygen."

    I still dont see why only replacing the rear speakers is better.

    It isn't. I screwed up. See item #3

    A good set of componant speakers in the front door will sound much better than the factory ones anyday, so why not replace them as well if you do replace the rear speakers?

    You are quite right. See item #3

    Components all around, as is your practice, is just plain great. As noted in preceding post, if I had had the common sense to just paint the tweeter grilles beige to match my interior, use the IKP61 *.pdf Position Two, with the tweeter just a bit higher I'd have made a much better choice.

    As I noted, my original goal was merely to turn you on to David Navone's hardware. You may run into a situation a bit out of the ordinary where access to his brilliantly conceived tools will have your business competitors speaking your name in hushed tones of awe and reverence.

    The only thing I'd offer is to keep the tweeters and mid-drivers of your components fairly close together. Less than 6" apart is cool. Less than 4" apart is golden.

    With gas so cheap, I'm tempted to take a road trip from Northwest Ohio to your place just to see your fabrication wizardry. To say I suck when it comes to such things is like saying the Taliban is not fully onboard with radical feminism.

    Those amp racks just SCREAM "Quality."

  14. #29
    ESCALADOR's Avatar
    ESCALADOR is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Manassas City, VA
    Posts
    246

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Quote Originally Posted by technobill View Post
    To say I suck when it comes to such things is like saying the Taliban is not fully onboard with radical feminism.
    LMAO!! You are something else Techno!!

  15. #30
    mbovinet is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2006 Escalade ESV Platinum
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    94

    Re: Pics of new AMP RACK

    Sweet looking setup!!

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting