Wahts Faster

[ktills45]

Originally Posted by SdMarineGuy

Personally I hate the style of the Magnum it looks like an Ugly Wagon.

the regular 300C does 5.3 seconds from 0-60 not 6.3 like you said and 13.9 second in the 1/4 mile. There is no way to campare a 300C with a 5.7L Hemi to a 3.6L CTS. I better race would we a 3.5L 300 against a 3.6L CTS. I think the CTS would with but just by a little.

Here are the comparisons

CTS
http://www.modernracer.com/cadillaccts.html

300C
http://www.modernracer.com/chrysler300c.html

Errr, according the the Oxford Dictionary, the 3.5l 300 is a pig.

0-60 8 seconds, 16.1 seconds 1/4 mile, 22.3 seconds 0-100.
0.75g skidpad, 60mph through a slalom.

All from Road and Track.

[Devil_concours]

Originally Posted by Franchise2005

yeah the 300 might be faster but its still a chrysler and the CTS is a Cadillac

300c is mostly mercedes benz underneathe the skin. (old e-class chassis with mb tranny)

Originally Posted by RobertCTS

Depends what engine is in it. They have a 2.7, 3.5 and 5.7 Hemi. You should beat all but the Hemi. That sucker(5.7) is available up to 425HP!!

new srt-8 is not a 5.7l instead 6.2l iirc.

Originally Posted by SdMarineGuy

the CTS-V will spank the Chrysler 300C

the 3.6L CTS will spank the 3.5 300

the 3.2L CTS will spank the 2.7 300



The question is what will win between a 3.6l CTs against a Nissan Maxima 3.5L
Or the 3.6L CTS against the 3.5L Nissan Altima?

Those car have some balls I think the CTS will loose there.

I've ran a 3.5 maxima se on the highway with 2 other passenger and i beat him but the older 3.5 maxima and altima weighs about 200lbs lighter with similar power output meaning it's going to be hard to beat

[Irishtom]

I don't know what cars my car can beat but I do know that I enjoy it when I get on it. What others do in their cars is their lookout and effects me not at all.

No matter what you buy there's always some young mechanical guy out there in a primered Camaro with 700 hp that can crush you.

Not to mention sport bikes.