4.3L Swap??? - Page 2

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
Cadillac CTS First Generation Forum - 2003 - 2007 Discussion, 4.3L Swap??? in Cadillac CTS Coupe, Sport Sedan and Sport Wagon Forums; the gen 5 eaton on the l32 is a little better than a port and polished gen 3 you would ...
  1. #16
    Kael's Avatar
    Kael is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): The Mighty Kael, 2004 Black CTS, Every Option
    Join Date
    Jul 2005

    Re: 4.3L Swap???

    the gen 5 eaton on the l32 is a little better than a port and polished gen 3 you would get from the l67.
    So it makes sense to just start with the L32

  2. #17
    DavidBoren's Avatar
    DavidBoren is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): Volant, VMAX, RX catch can, tranny cooler... RIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Portland, OR

    Re: 4.3L Swap???

    The HFV6 replaced the 3800. Even supercharged, even with the better supercharger, the L32 made/makes the same horsepower as the base LY7, (+/-) 260. Yes, it can be made to make more power... pretty easily at that. Smaller pulley, bigger injectors. But for the price of dropping that into a CTS, you could make the V6 that is already there way more powerful.

    The 4.3 will at least fit in the engine bay of a CTS without any trouble, or should. Even though its bigger in displacement, a pushrod engine is generally going to be noticeably smaller than just about any DOHC engine with the same number of cylinders.

    The straight six Atlas probably wouldnt fit. Or at least I seriously doubt it would fit without moving the radiator to the back. But a dry-sump, F/I Atlas, with a rear mounted radiator would be amazing. Maybe ditch the spare tire and mount the radiator there. But that is a super neat engine. I think it should be everyone's direct replacement for the 4.0L inline six engines in their Jeeps. There are not nearly enough forced induction I-6 Atlas engines either.

    If you are going to drop a inline six into a CTS, make it a 2JZ-GTE. Some of you GM geeks might hate me for that, but as far as inline sixes go, there is not a better engine than the 2JZ (unless we double the displacement and go 5.9L Cummings!!!)... Hell, put a 4BT four liter Cummings in a CTS.

    This is just getting ridiculous...

  3. #18
    djkdawg's Avatar
    djkdawg is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2005 cts 3.6L
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Irving, TX
    Never thought I would see a v6 power war, personally I would go with the v8 not only for power since some v6s can been tuned up, but for exhaust sound, I miss my v8 growl but other than that I like saving gas.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    Cadillac Forums

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

What Cadillac(s) do you own? (Or type NONE)

Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts