While most on the forum don't want to associate their CTSs with the old Catera line and insist they aren't related, I disagree. Having read a few posts about it that seems to be the concensus, with some claiming to have GM inside info that the "C" just stands for "C-series", I think GM just retired the Catera's name as it did the Seville, Deville, Eldorado, etc., to go with the current alphabet soup of initials for model designations. Believe what you want if it makes you feel better but last week when I ordered some parts (seat belt retractor, a dash cover, A/B module, etc.)for the 2004 CTS right from GM they came with papers, for saftey installation and such, that said: "for installation in only model year 2004 CATERA...". Should have saved them and scanned it in. I have almost finished the CTS except for the A/B and dash and it's a great fun car but it sure doesn't have the features that came standard on the '98 Catera. If only the old Catera had that terrific 3.6L instead of the 3.0L!! Reliability issues?? 123K on the Catera (I am not original owner) and everything still works. I'm not bashing the CTS or those that love it, just trying to say that I think they have a lot more in common than most want to accept. I know the CTS can be equipped with a ton of options, and mine isn't, but for the time the Catera was conceived it was/is impressive. I love the looks of both, different as they are and to run around in the CTS is wonderful. For a roadtrip I'd drive the Catera. I'll put the flame suit on now and wait it out.
Owner of:
2004 SLS-wife's
2004 CTS-toy
1998 Catera-for sale maybe
2001 VW Jetta TDI-everyday commuter/52 MPG average
1999 GMC Suburban
