From A Caddy to A SHO! - Page 2

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19
Cadillac or competing brand model ? Why ? Discussion, From A Caddy to A SHO! in Item Specific Cadillac Discussion; Originally Posted by 92EldoTC why is it that in magazine articles and statistics on the internet about SHOs they always ...
  1. #16
    Blackout's Avatar
    Blackout is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1995 FTS
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Dover, DE

    Re: From A Caddy to A SHO!

    Quote Originally Posted by 92EldoTC View Post
    why is it that in magazine articles and statistics on the internet about SHOs they always put the 92 0-60 and quarter times for the automatic version which is 0-60 in 7.6 and quarter at 15.7-15.9 (varies from magazine to magazine).
    From my understanding most of the 92's came with the 5-speed, it seems logical to put the 5- speed times up instead and from what i've been reading it is 0-60 @ 6.6 and the quarter @ 15.2 @ 91 mph.
    The only years they put the 5- speed times up for is the 89-91.
    Maybe it has something to do with the competition from its big brother the Mustang 5.0. They didnt want it to be known that a Taurus would outrun the pride of Ford motor company.
    1992 SHO's only came in 5 speeds. Once they started offering the automatic option then you would get a 3.2 liter V6 instead of the 3.0 V6 for the 5 speed. The main reason behind giving the automatics bigger displacement engines is because they put out slightly more power to make up for the drive train loss. But there was a few years that the SHO was actually faster then the Mustang

  2. #17
    EMB1230's Avatar
    EMB1230 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): None
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Kenosha, Wi

    Re: From A Caddy to A SHO!

    I too used to have a 90 SHO. Red exterior with the black interior (very desirable) but I had the partial leather seats not the all leather ones. And yes, like may have siad they truly could do 140 MPH and then some. all 89-92's had manual shift, from 93-95 you could choose between manual and automatic, the latter making up about 80% of the total production of SHO's. Unfortunetly, as with the regular taurses, the automatic tranny on SHO's was crap. 96-99 had a 3.4L 32 valve V8 which ONLY came with automatic and even though rated at 235hp, they couldn't touch the original 3.0L/manual trans. SHO's. It was also notoriously known for the cam sprockets seperating from the camshafts, typically around 50k mile mark. It was remieded if caught early enough by having the sprockets "pinned"

  3. #18
    thebigjimsho's Avatar
    thebigjimsho is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): ZIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    In the barrel of a gun...

    Re: From A Caddy to A SHO!

    I hit an indicated 145 in my '92 although who knows about speedo error when going that fast.

    And the V in that vid was mine. Boosted Yamahas are no joke...

    (Just remember the V in the vid was loaded down with people and a car full of luggage on a cross country trip. The SHO had 2 people and was empty. Granted, the SHO still would've won but not by as much...)

  4. Remove Advertisements
    Cadillac Forums

  5. #19
    92EldoTC's Avatar
    92EldoTC is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): Ex:'92 ETC 4.9 Current:'91 Sedan Deville 4.9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Vegas, NV
    Thread Starter

    Re: From A Caddy to A SHO!

    I went to the track for the first time in my SHO.
    My timeslip shows how inexperienced I am at drag racing.
    I didnt have the smarts to go around the pool of water that is sprayed down before each race which I probably lost a good half second spinning.
    My shifts were all perfect, never missed a gear except I could have put each gear a little closer to redline than I did.
    My reaction time was an elderly .7xx.
    So say .5 sec spinning tires plus .7xx equals about 1.2 seconds lost but of course a .0xx r/t is impossible so say a .2 or .3 r/t is ideal. .7xx r/t-.2 or .3 equals .4 to .5.
    Adjusted lost time is now about .9xx to 1.0 seconds
    My best time was 16.38. take .9 or 1.0 seconds off of that and that gives me 15.48 to 15.38 e.t.
    .2xx seconds off of what a new stock 92 SHO mtx should run.
    .2xx seconds off of the tested time is probably due to higher mileage (133000) and more than 3/4 tank of gas in the tank.
    Those lovely secondaries still open up @ 4k and produce a good thrust with a lovely sound. I actually feel the tires fighting to pull the car to the left when the secondaries open up under full throttle.
    I've gotten considerably better at driving this manual transmission car since going to the track.
    Wonder if I can beat a 93-97 sts.

  6. Remove Advertisements
    Cadillac Forums

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

What Cadillac(s) do you own? (Or type NONE)

Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts