'93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Cadillac or competing brand model ? Why ? Discussion, '93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS in Item Specific Cadillac Discussion; Morning dear friends , I think this is right place to post this thread .Well, it really draws my interest ...
  1. #1
    Cadillacboy's Avatar
    Cadillacboy is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1996 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,245

    '93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS

    Morning dear friends ,
    I think this is right place to post this thread .Well, it really draws my interest to learn anything as much as possible about '93-96 FWBs
    So, I will try to make a comparison '93-96 FWB vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS .More correctly , I will need your experiences and shed a light on this by your valuable inputs .
    This comparison is based on stock cars so no mods is taken .I will compare those cars in a few sections are these below :
    Braking distance ,performance ,turning ratio ...
    Now, I am narrowing it down .'93-96 FWBs don't have the disks on the rear brakes they all come with drum .As I recall, that wouldn't cause a problem but I have still some question marks on my mind .
    1- Do you know stopping distance or braking distance to '93-96 FWB ? (stock)
    I assume Seville has a shorter distance but don't know for sure
    2-Acceleration ...Stock Seville vs stock '95 FWB ,Seville must be faster but can you really feel that coming from '00 STS to '95 FWB ? Is there really noticeably and convincingly win for '00 STS .
    Let's say for 0-60 mph ,0-50 mph ,30-70 mph .
    3- Turning radius in other words maneuverability .Ok, you can park easier '00 STS but is FWB really that difficult in regards to parking and maneuverability ? What I wanna learn let's say you make two maneuvers ( one forth and one back) where you park a '00 STS but how about the '95 FWB ? That's really a crucial point for me
    I asked a few persons they all said FWB is easier at parking then a W140 S600 albeit it's dimensions .Is it true ?
    Thanks

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    96Fleetwood's Avatar
    96Fleetwood is offline Auto Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 2002 Eldorado Collectors Series and 1994 Fleetwood
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,685

    Re: '93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS

    Well, with respect to all your questions.. the STS takes the cake hands down. A stock Fleetwood does not stop well, does not handle well, and is not easy to maneuver.

    The only upside of the Fleetwood is the low maintenance costs, cheaper insurance, and reliability.


    .. and this is coming from a Fleetwood owner whos brother has owned a 2000 and 2002 STS to compare to.
    1994 Cadillac Fleetwood- the sleeper project
    2002 Pontiac Trans Am Collectors Edition WS6 Conv't- the show car
    2002 Cadillac Eldorado Collectors Series # 1572
    2006 Mini Cooper S BRG 6spd- the autox gokart
    2014 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged- wife's daily driver
    2014 Ram 1500 Laramie Hemi Crew 4x4- daily driver/tow vehicle

  4. #3
    Cadillacboy's Avatar
    Cadillacboy is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1996 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,245
    Thread Starter

    Re: '93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS

    Thank you
    Well,sorry for asking you a question and taking your time but can you compare your '96 that is a modified one to your brother 2000 ?
    What would be the results this time with the respect to aforementioned comparisons ?
    Thanks

  5. #4
    96Fleetwood's Avatar
    96Fleetwood is offline Auto Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 2002 Eldorado Collectors Series and 1994 Fleetwood
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,685

    Re: '93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS

    In its current state, my '96 Fleetwood can probably match or surpass a 2000 STS in all the aforementioned except maneuvering... it is just too long to swing around like you can swing a FWD STS. Even though my Fleetwood is stiff, it still has so much more weight to shift during sudden lane changes and the like.

    As for parking, I have grown accustomed to it, mainly because most of the cars I have owned were this big. It is harder to park than most cars, but it is something I deal with, even with the Roadmaster.

    One thing the Fleetwood does not have is the crazy torque steer the FWD Northstar cars have. I prefer to have my rear wheels spinning
    1994 Cadillac Fleetwood- the sleeper project
    2002 Pontiac Trans Am Collectors Edition WS6 Conv't- the show car
    2002 Cadillac Eldorado Collectors Series # 1572
    2006 Mini Cooper S BRG 6spd- the autox gokart
    2014 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged- wife's daily driver
    2014 Ram 1500 Laramie Hemi Crew 4x4- daily driver/tow vehicle

  6. #5
    Cadillacboy's Avatar
    Cadillacboy is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 1996 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,245
    Thread Starter

    Re: '93-96 Fleetwood vs '00 Cadillac Seville STS

    Thanks again ,your helps much appreciated
    Somehow ,I will install a rear view camera to be safe and sound parking and make a pattern some of the mods you have done so far when I get a '93-96 FWB as well .
    I think I would leave the suspension as it is because I am used to driving comfortable cars so I assume due to the mods in your car you have a firmer and harder suspension than '00 STS .
    I also thought of buying a Jaguar XJR prior to buying Cadillac but XJR is said to have a harder suspension than most cars that's why I switched to Northstar Cadillac .
    Comfort level is also important to me . Back to parking , I talked to a '93 FWB owner who also owns a '02 W220 MB and says his '93 is way comfortable and easier to maneuver than W140 S600 and only drawback is lenght when parking between two cars .
    Agree, I don't like torque steer either and prefer rear wheels spinning
    Thank you

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting