2003 Bmw M5 E39 - Page 5
Cadillac
 

Cadillac Forums | Help Us Help You | Advertise | Cadillac Parts | Cadillac News | Cadillac Classifieds / (Old System)

Cadillac Technical Archive | Cadillac Dealers | Cadillac Reviews | Cadillac Dealer Reviews | Cadillac Vendors

CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
Results 61 to 62 of 62
Cadillac or competing brand model ? Why ? Discussion, 2003 Bmw M5 E39 in Item Specific Cadillac Discussion; The effective final gearing comparison. CTS-V: 3rd 5.3339:1 4th 3.73:1 5th 3.133:1 6th 2.088:1 E39 M5: 3rd 5.103:1 4th 3.8745:1 ...
  1. #61
    MWD's Avatar
    MWD
    MWD is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2005 CTS-V Stealth Gray
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Apex, NC
    Age
    44
    Posts
    143

    Re: 2003 Bmw M5 E39

    The effective final gearing comparison.

    CTS-V:
    3rd 5.3339:1
    4th 3.73:1
    5th 3.133:1
    6th 2.088:1

    E39 M5:
    3rd 5.103:1
    4th 3.8745:1
    5th 3.15:1
    6th 2.6145:1

    Notice that the M5 has much closer gear ratios (5.1 to 2.6) versus the V's wider (5.3 to 2.1) range, so for raw performance, the M5 is more optimal.

    Notice also that in 4th gear, the torque multiplication factor is 4% better for the M5, so the 1-2% advantage for the 1:1 higher efficiency in the V, should still give the M5 a slight upper hand, but in real life, the V pulls the M5 in 4th.

    Now if you look at the chart for optimal V shift points:


    You can see that both 2->3 and 3->4 are SUB-optimal in the V with a factory rev-limit of 6600rpm. So the V is making a huge ratio jump in the 3->4 shift and dropping out of the power band from 95mph to about 105, yet Jim claims that he is still pulling away from the M5 at this point (up to 110).

    The speed in gears makes this a little more obvious:


    And you can see that the MOST optimal shift in the V is the 4->5 shift, because instead of dropping out of the power band, you make a short ratio jump and end up starting 5th at 5500, putting down the same 340 or so whp that you were in 4th. I.e. you don't take a hp drop like 3rd-4th, which starts out back at 275whp or so back at 4500. So simply put, the V is really at the top of it's game from 100-160mph, and if you haven't pulled ahead by 100, there is little chance of getting it back.

    Looking at that last chart, it is pretty clear why the V is no high speed record holder.... 6th gear is simply for highway mileage not top speed runs. In stock form, there just isn't enough power down below 4500 rpm to mount a charge towards the 180mph mark in 6th gear.

    Michael

  2. #62
    thebigjimsho's Avatar
    thebigjimsho is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): ZIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    In the barrel of a gun...
    Posts
    49,668

    Re: 2003 Bmw M5 E39

    Yumm, 240mph in 6th...

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting