So, GM and their HF equipment is pretty modular in many ways.
The CT6 3.0TT has a better distribution across the cores than the 3.6 does, with lighter "pastic" components that would reduce heat soak further.
I highly suggest that shops take a look at the cores and upper intake portion in general to see if it would be a worthy addition to the components you already offer.
Or some brave end-user can give it a shot as well.
The CT6 3.0TT has a better distribution across the cores than the 3.6 does, with lighter "pastic" components that would reduce heat soak further.
I highly suggest that shops take a look at the cores and upper intake portion in general to see if it would be a worthy addition to the components you already offer.
Or some brave end-user can give it a shot as well.