cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .
cadillac ats forums cadillac ats forums
CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Like Tree6Likes
Cadillac ATS General Discussion Forum Discussion, cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 . in Cadillac ATS Discussion Forums; Automotive addicts tested cts 2.0 t . 0-60 6.0 and 3.6 was 6.2 . The 2.0 in the cts has ...
  1. #1
    transam00 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0 T
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    333

    cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Automotive addicts tested cts 2.0 t . 0-60 6.0 and 3.6 was 6.2 . The 2.0 in the cts has 272 hp and 295 lb. Ft.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    RxNotec's Avatar
    RxNotec is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS4 3.6
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    81

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    AWD acceleration vs RWD acceleration is my guess. Motor Trend found the same result.
    http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ts_first_test/

    Not the same story though in the ATS v6 vs I4T.

  4. #3
    ChevyRules is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2014 Cadillac ATS Premium 3.6 AWD
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    81

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    The higher torque at the lower RPM also probably helps as well.

  5. #4
    carpenter is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): '14 ATS 4 Black Raven 3.6 Premium
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Age
    39
    Posts
    728

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    They didn't test the 3.6 so they are just going off numbers that Motor Trend had for their 3.6 car. Pretty hard to actually compare that way. Really need to see a comparison between the same cars with just different engines unlike the AWD/RWD comparison Motor Trend did on the 2.0T AWD and 3.6 RWD. I drove the 2.0T CTS for a few weeks and am now driving one again and it's a damn nice engine though. At first I thought it was a bit underpowered in the CTS but that I think that was because I was coming from the 3.6 in the ATS and trying to compare. It definitely moves the car really well.

  6. #5
    myATS is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS LTG 6MT
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    133

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by RxNotec View Post
    Not the same story though in the ATS v6 vs I4T.
    Because cadillac limited our torque with 13 and 14's.

  7. #6
    Johnm05's Avatar
    Johnm05 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0T
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    232

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    One more variable to throw out there is temperature and altitude. A 235i (320hp) would out accelarte an IS-F(400hp) a mile above sea level because of the turbo.
    ben.gators likes this.

  8. #7
    exbagboy's Avatar
    exbagboy is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0T Premium
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    285

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    ^Which is why I got the turbo in Colorado. Plus potential tune gains.
    Johnm05 likes this.

  9. #8
    donavo is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): ATS RWD 2.0T MANUAL
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, Unite
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,256

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by exbagboy View Post
    ^Which is why I got the turbo in Colorado. Plus potential tune gains.
    isnt colorado at a very high altitude?

  10. #9
    ben.gators is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0L Turbo Performance, 99 Seville STS--Gone!
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    In the middle of water!
    Posts
    4,318

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by donavo View Post
    isnt colorado at a very high altitude?
    One mile above the sea. How I know: I watch "the fast lane car"
    http://www.tflcar.com/

    They are located in Denver and they always talk about the altitude of Denver and its effect on 0-60 time.

  11. #10
    Johnm05's Avatar
    Johnm05 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0T
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    232

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by ben.gators View Post
    One mile above the sea. How I know: I watch "the fast lane car"
    http://www.tflcar.com/

    They are located in Denver and they always talk about the altitude of Denver and its effect on 0-60 time.

    lol Yea that where I saw the 235i vs IS-F

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiT4aaEXN5o

  12. #11
    donavo is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): ATS RWD 2.0T MANUAL
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, Unite
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,256

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    well in that case the 2.0T would really suffer because of turbo. and the 3.6 would do better. am i wrong? turbo relies more on air density than NA. does it not?

  13. #12
    Guy.Seminerio is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): 2009 STS-V; 1979 Coupe Deville, 2012 Chevy Cruze Eco Manual
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Whitestone, NY
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,910

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by donavo View Post
    well in that case the 2.0T would really suffer because of turbo. and the 3.6 would do better. am i wrong? turbo relies more on air density than NA. does it not?
    That was my impression.

    Also, I'm willing to bet that on say a 70-150 run, the 3.6 would walk away from the 2.0 stock.

  14. #13
    Johnm05's Avatar
    Johnm05 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0T
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    232

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by donavo View Post
    well in that case the 2.0T would really suffer because of turbo. and the 3.6 would do better. am i wrong? turbo relies more on air density than NA. does it not?
    Other way around. At altitude the air is less dense and a turbo pressurizes air and makes it more dense again. although both suffer the turbo takes less of a hit. specially new turbos like ours that are torque managed which means the car will do anything including raising boost pressure to get the power and in the case of high altitude the turbo will work harder achieve power. While the NA has no way of compensating.
    ben.gators and exbagboy like this.

  15. #14
    donavo is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): ATS RWD 2.0T MANUAL
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, Unite
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,256

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnm05 View Post
    Other way around. At altitude the air is less dense and a turbo pressurizes air and makes it more dense again. although both suffer the turbo takes less of a hit. specially new turbos like ours that are torque managed which means the car will do anything including raising boost pressure to get the power and in the case of high altitude it will pump more air to achieve power. While the NA has no way of compensating.
    if that was true, y do i always hear about cold weather being boost weather or good for the turbo weather or "more horsepower" weather? colder air is dencer so that leads me to believe that dencer air has a bigger plus on a turbo engine....

  16. #15
    Johnm05's Avatar
    Johnm05 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0T
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    232

    Re: cts 2.0 T faster than 3.6 0-60 .

    Quote Originally Posted by donavo View Post
    if that was true, y do i always hear about cold weather being boost weather or good for the turbo weather or "more horsepower" weather? colder air is dencer so that leads me to believe that dencer air has a bigger plus on a turbo engine....
    Denser air is good for both Turbos and N/A however when the air is thinner a turbo car can compensate by working the turbos harder and the N/A has no way to compensate. Also say the Ambient psi is 2 less than at sea level (made up number) the turbo can also compensate the 2psi while the N/A can't.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting