Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6
cadillac ats forums cadillac ats forums
CadillacForums.com is the premier Cadillac Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
Like Tree1Likes
Cadillac ATS General Discussion Forum Discussion, Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6 in Cadillac ATS Discussion Forums; Just got the new Car & Driver. ATS 3.6 vs. 335i vs. IS350 F Sport. IS350 won by a hair ...
  1. #1
    huna is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): ATS 3.6 AWD Premium Thunder Gray, Caramel, with peanuts
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    106

    Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Just got the new Car & Driver. ATS 3.6 vs. 335i vs. IS350 F Sport. IS350 won by a hair over the 335i (208 to 207 points). ATS last with 201. Looking at the result chart, the ATS lost primarily due to transmission, 1/4 mile speed, and driver and rear seat comfort. The chassis was viewed as the best, but not able to overcome the transmission in the ratings.

    Reading the article, I can't say I disagree much with the write-ups of all three cars.

    Their brief ATS report:
    "Plus: If everything were as excellent as the chassis, this would be untouchable.
    Minus: Nothing is as excellent as the chassis; CUE is as excellent as herpes. [I must admit that made me chuckle. So call me juvenile. ;-)]
    Equals: The most fun, but the most flawed."

  2. Remove Advertisements
    CadillacForums.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Stevo Supremo's Avatar
    Stevo Supremo is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): ATS RWD 2.0 Manual
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,342

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    yeah I read that review, just another load of Toyota following BMW humping crap.

  4. #3
    73JPS is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0T Performance 6MT
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    268

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    I haven't read the review, but after only 3 days with CUE, I can say that it works very well: very well indeed.

    As a bit of a human/machine interface buff, I must confess that I was expecting to not be too thrilled with CUE. I can honestly say that it works very very well: the menus are logical, and the response is adequate enough that I don't lament the loss of knobs and buttons nearly as much as I thought I would: in fact, I am not missing them much at all.

    I will go out on a flaming limb and say that I think that many of CUE's media detractors have a relatively low I-CUE.

  5. #4
    Fraggy's Avatar
    Fraggy is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    911
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevo Supremo
    yeah I read that review, just another load of Toyota following BMW humping crap.
    Actually it's not at all. Go drive a 335 and and listen to it bang off shifts with ease. Additionally, it fully engages at a very low RPM and stays fully engaged no matter what the drivers doing unless it is going to absolutely harm the engine unlike our car that slips like a little bitch between 2000 and 3500 RPM. I posted videos and comments about this already it's a very true phenomenon.

    But the ATS suspension and steering are way ahead of the BMW. I tolerate the transmission to get enjoy the rest of the car. I could not though tolerate the BMW steering and suspension just to enjoy their transmission.

  6. #5
    Siren05's Avatar
    Siren05 is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0T RWD. 2011 STI Hatchback.
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Age
    39
    Posts
    293

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    I've owned an is350. Very nice car indeed.
    I've driven many 335s stock and tuned.

    I would agree the auto tranny is mostly always looking for a gear. I think it just needs proper tuning on
    Better Shift points.

    But I also believe a properly tuned 2.0 will dust stock 335/is350s and ATS 3.6
    Ha.

    Lol
    Just figured I throw that in.

    I love my ATS CHASSIS and suspension?

  7. #6
    torkibe is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 3.6
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    140

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Obviously we are going to be biased but... I am o.k. with these assessments. Admittedly the tranny is a bit annoying on hard acceleration on the parkway, but short of that; every area the ATS excelled in is an area that has far more bearing on real world driving. I'm not getting into drag races on the streets. However if a potential accident arises (which I have noted in another thread) I'll take the superior steering, brakes, and chassis which will help me stay alive. My back seat rarely sees anyone other than my 4 1/2 year old in his booster seat (and has not since he was born) so the roominess back there is a moot point.

    In my humble opinion the ATS is the sexiest looking of the 3 hands down. And CUE is only a problem while you are learning it. A lot of the comparison/reviews are a little unfair because they spend a day or two in the car and then pass judgement. Of course a more advanced system is going to have a learning curve. Sit someone down in front of PC or tablet that has never used one before and imagine their frustration.

    Someone was kind enough to scan the entire article -

    http://imgur.com/a/4n2sV#0

  8. #7
    flycaster's Avatar
    flycaster is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0T AT Lux, 2005 Z4 2.5i
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Age
    75
    Posts
    679

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    73JPS, as an interface buff, what do you have to say about the difficulty (at least for me) in having CUE understand certain commands? For example, during Navigation, CUE could not understand "Coral Springs." After at least 5-6 tries by me and my wife, and CUE coming no wheres near "Coral Springs," we gave up. Now, I'm fairly computer savvy when it comes to getting around within its interface environment, and agree that there are many that aren't - thus their failure to appreciate/use what it can do, but there have been many similar instances of CUE failing to understand commands. BTW, aside from CUE being a little slow, this is my only problem with it...CUE is a lot of fun to work with.

    Fraggy, couldn't agree with you more about the transmission. Coming from two BMW drives, I do find that the ATS has a lot to learn transmission-wise before it competes with BMW in this area. As for steering, your comment about ATS having the better steering, only goes to confirm my feeling that there is also much to be improved with both the present day BMW and the ATS steering. Neither of these cars come within miles, and I do mean miles, to the steering of the BMW E46s (3-series that ended around 2007, when BMW went plush with their suspension and steering).

  9. #8
    73JPS is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0T Performance 6MT
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    268

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Quote Originally Posted by flycaster View Post
    73JPS, as an interface buff, what do you have to say about the difficulty (at least for me) in having CUE understand certain commands? For example, during Navigation, CUE could not understand "Coral Springs." After at least 5-6 tries by me and my wife, and CUE coming no wheres near "Coral Springs," we gave up. Now, I'm fairly computer savvy when it comes to getting around within its interface environment, and agree that there are many that aren't - thus their failure to appreciate/use what it can do, but there have been many similar instances of CUE failing to understand commands. BTW, aside from CUE being a little slow, this is my only problem with it...CUE is a lot of fun to work with.
    It's interesting you mention the voice command aspect: I have never had much luck with voice command systems in the past, but the few times I have used this one it has worked really well. It even identified the less-than-normal last name of a friend of mine on the first try. I guess maybe my sample size is too small: I'll try "Coral Springs" just for fun and see what it gives me. I wonder if these systems are very forgiving of local accents? I also wonder how it would do with places like Ixtapa Zihuatanejo, or even Des Moines.

    My big worry with CUE was the lack of normal knobs and buttons: here are simply functions for which those are the best interface, IMHO. But having used the system for a few days, I have found the swipe/haptic combo to be quite effective, and certainly no where near as awkward as I thought it would be; the steering wheel controls are also quite good.

  10. #9
    ATSwannabe is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): none
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    69

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Quote Originally Posted by Siren05 View Post
    I've owned an is350. Very nice car indeed.
    I've driven many 335s stock and tuned.

    I would agree the auto tranny is mostly always looking for a gear. I think it just needs proper tuning on
    Better Shift points.

    But I also believe a properly tuned 2.0 will dust stock 335/is350s and ATS 3.6
    Ha.

    Lol
    Just figured I throw that in.

    I love my ATS CHASSIS and suspension?
    I believe a properly tuned 2.0 would be about equal to a 335I,but there are many options in the after market for tuning the 335I.Some 335I's are turning 11 sec quarter mile times at more than 120mph.The unmodified 335I is considerly faster than the ATS 3.6,the 2.0 or the IS350.Once you start tuning you will always find someone who will outdo your best efforts.

  11. #10
    bdwalters is offline Cadillac Owners Fanatic
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0T Premium
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    160

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    I'm surprised that the IS was able to win this. The initial reviews of it said that it didn't drive any better than the previous model. This is really a disaster for BMW. With the new Q50, A4, and C coming out soon, the 3 might not win any comparisons with the F30 going forward. The ATS and Q50 will probably reign as the most fun to drive, stealing that traditional victory from the 3, and one of the other cars will take the best overall prize as well. BMW better get its stuff together or the 3 is going to be just another good sports sedan that happens to have a little more room and slightly better mileage than the other models, if that.

    As for Cadillac, where is the 8-speed Aisin auto (besides in the CTS Vsport and probably the ATS-V)? Put that and a few more CUE bug fixes into the ATS and you have a clear winner in all of these comparason tests! Is the 8-speed really that much more expensive? I had hoped that it would be available in the 2014 model, but I guess I'm going to have to wait a little longer. I just wish I hadn't driven the 3. The handling and breaking are sub-par, but man that powertrain is something wonderful to behold... Cadillac, give me a comperable powertrain, along with your superior driving dynamics, and I'll be one happy man!

  12. #11
    flycaster's Avatar
    flycaster is offline Cadillac Owners Enthusiast
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS 2.0T AT Lux, 2005 Z4 2.5i
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Boynton Beach, FL
    Age
    75
    Posts
    679

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Quote Originally Posted by 73JPS View Post
    ... I'll try "Coral Springs" just for fun and see what it gives me...
    Yeah, I'm quite interested in your test's outcome...let us know.

    ----------

    [QUOTE=bdwalters;3304568 I just wish I hadn't driven the 3. The handling and breaking are sub-par, but man that powertrain is something wonderful to behold... [/QUOTE]

    If you want to experience the true BMW driving experience, drive a BMW 3-series E46 (discontinued after 2006, then came the E90 and the rest of the floaters) and you'll realize that none of these newer cars can come close to it handling characteristics. And, the E46 had a great transmission, even then.

  13. #12
    M5eater's Avatar
    M5eater is offline Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
    Automobile(s): ATS 2.0T RWD FE3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Suffolk, VA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,525

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    I'm surprised that the IS was able to win this. The initial reviews of it said that it didn't drive any better than the previous model. This is really a disaster for BMW. With the new Q50, A4, and C coming out soon, the 3 might not win any comparisons with the F30 going forward. The ATS and Q50 will probably reign as the most fun to drive, stealing that traditional victory from the 3, and one of the other cars will take the best overall prize as well. BMW better get its stuff together or the 3 is going to be just another good sports sedan that happens to have a little more room and slightly better mileage than the other models, if that
    Although the review hasn't come to the interwebz yet, I'm surprised that it won this as well, more so considering the lack-luster power trains that carried over (and the perplexing thought that the reason the ATS doesn't win comparaison are it's powertrain options) Espically considering that the inital reviews I saw placed it behind

    car reviews frankly are full of contradictions and nonsensical opinions. Period.

    Case in point;
    (from the SAME site comparing the SAME cars)
    Stressing that this was a brief and informal track-only comparison—a proper comparo is forthcoming—we found the BMW was our favorite, with the IS350 F Sport a close second.
    http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...d-style-page-2

    I try to look at the smaller blogs and sites rather than any of the major auditorials for evaluation. Because eventually they(the major sites) all sort of just say the same thing anyway.

  14. #13
    Hoosier Daddy's Avatar
    Hoosier Daddy is offline Moderator
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS Performance 2.0T M6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Winchestertonfieldville, AZ
    Age
    65
    Posts
    3,790

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Quote Originally Posted by M5eater View Post
    car reviews frankly are full of contradictions and nonsensical opinions. Period.
    Comparisons certainly are. For market reasons, basic classes of cars come to exist. Obviously if people could totally define the car they drive nobody would buy a single car on the market today. Nobody. But manufacturers can not make a car from scratch for every driver so they design a small finite number of cars they they believe the most people will accept. They make sure they are not too identical to any other car in the class lest they become irrelevant and not too different lest buyers get confused. So any comparison is just an exercise to see which car comes closest to the reviewers' idea of the least amount of compromises from THEIR personal ideal. Their opinion of which car is best is irrelevant to anyone but themselves. Various measurements are relevant but opinions on which are most important don't matter to the next person.

    And even some measurements are nearly nonsensical and akin to looking for something where the light is better rather than where you lost it. The best example is 0-60 times. Absolutely nobody cares how long it takes to get to a certain speed other than from being hypnotized by those who came up with the idea. All anybody cares about is time to distance. Who cares about 0-60 stats when you can race a car with a slower 0-60 than your car and be looking at its tail lights when you hit 60 because it got to 20, 30, 40 and 50 (or some combination) before yours did?

  15. #14
    thebigjimsho's Avatar
    thebigjimsho is offline Cadillac Owners 10000+ Posts
    Automobile(s): ZIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    In the barrel of a gun...
    Posts
    49,468

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    The good news is Cadillac got right the bones. It just needs to polish up a first year effort. Cadillac knows how to improve a great design. The ATS will reign supreme before long...

  16. #15
    USe-car is offline Cadillac Owners Member
    Automobile(s): 2013 ATS & 2012 Volt
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Georgetown, TX
    Age
    66
    Posts
    74

    Re: Car & Driver comparison: IS 350 F Sport/335i/ATS 3.6

    Car & Driver picking a Japanese car over an American car in a comparison?? Gee, what a surprise. They've been doing that since the invention of the printing press. I dropped them years ago because of that reason.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Bookmarks

Cadillac Posting Rules

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Read about Lincoln | Buick | Kia Forte Forum
Need products for your Cadillac? Check out your options at the links below:

custom floor mats | Cadillac Chrome and Black Chrome Wheels | window tinting