View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-06, 04:45 PM
Koooop's Avatar
Koooop Koooop is offline
Cadillac Owners Connoisseur
Cadillac(s): Black CTS-V, '84 Eldo Convertible w/pimp package
View Koooop's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: So. California
Age: 46
Casino Cash: $10045
iTrader: (0)
Re: GM Cadillac attorney lies to win lemon law case

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovenguth View Post
Just got back from New Jersey, some real interesting folks on this board and for those with positive thoughts, I thank you. Having all the repairs docs was the key. I would like to clarify my original statement about Cadillacs as I have owned a 1959 Coupe Deville and a 1798 Coupe Deville; excellent cars. This last one, the 2005 DHS was a real electrical mess. At the Lemon Law hearing I submitted my docs and the judge and both lawyers went behind closed doors and came out 15 minutes later and told me GM would re-purchase the car. I signed off on it. Asked the judge if I could have my 2,200 mile journey reimbursed and he said, No! This has been a not so nice Cadillac experience and I will just keep my memories of my other Cadillacs. Will say that the drivetrain seemed high quality and the suspension on the DHS to me is better then the DTS. Just my opinion.

Did that 1798 Coupe DeVille come over on the Mayflower? LOL

Glad to hear GM bought your car back, sounds like that car was a real POS.

Did you ask for costs before or after the award? I could see the judge saying NO afterward, but not before.